$Global cooperation mending a fractured Earth.$

Are International Climate Agreements Doomed to Fail? Unpacking the Truth

Lena Voss in Climate & Environment June 2025 • 6 min read.

"Explore the effectiveness of global climate treaties and discover why power dynamics and economic interests often undermine their success. Is there a path forward?"

Climate change and its related environmental concerns constitute a worldwide crisis, intertwined with substantial economic challenges. The consistent schedule of international conferences designed to tackle these pressing issues—such as those held in the UK in 2021 and Egypt in 2022—ignites significant debate regarding the true effectiveness and practicality of the commitments made. Are these global agreements genuinely making a difference, or are they simply performative?

This article takes a step back to critically examine international treaties, emphasizing the crucial need to fully understand the power dynamics at play and the vested interests of stakeholders. These underlying forces often delay and obstruct the implementation of logical actions aimed at mitigating the anthropogenic contributions to climate change and its far-reaching impacts. It’s a complex web where good intentions meet real-world obstacles.

As nations progress economically, environmental and social concerns tend to escalate. Countries find themselves in a balancing act: striving to maintain acceptable living standards while simultaneously reducing emissions. This dynamic results in nations wielding disproportionate influence in global decision-making, largely based on the scale of their economies. Addressing climate change effectively requires a fundamental shift in approach, one that prioritizes acknowledging and adhering to global commitments through civil pressure, rather than relying solely on traditional, and often biased, systems of international political diplomacy. This article will evaluate climate-friendly actions and propose innovative ideas to promote such activities, advocating for a 'transition regime' as a solution to the metastasizing challenges that affect all nations.

The Political Game: How Conflicting Interests Undermine Climate Action

Global cooperation mending a fractured Earth.

Climate change and environmental concerns present significant challenges to sustainable development at both global and national levels. As human activities continue to impact the planet's ecosystems and climate, there is an urgent need for collective action to mitigate these effects. The perspective presented seeks to address a central research question: Are international environmental agreements effective in achieving their goals, or do economic interests ultimately undermine their success? Some answers and solutions are proposed to tackle the global challenges related to climate change, which endangers the survival of mankind and a large portion of the life that currently exists on Earth in the long run. This work offers perspective addressing a real conundrum, analogous to that of the frog placed in gradually heated water (referring to the tale of the boiling frog). It is crucial to make decisions and take actions, otherwise, we will rightly be held accountable by future generations (i.e. history) for the damage knowingly caused to our planet. Sitting on the fence or procrastinating cannot be justified any longer, difficult decisions leading to positive climate impacts need to be taken, and in fact are now long overdue. We cannot steal other generations' futures and leave a permanently damaged environment as our legacies.

International environmental agreements have evolved over time, with their roots primarily in the 1970's and 1980s, when certain countries began to recognize the need for collective action to address environmental challenges. Since then, numerous agreements have been adopted to address a wide range of issues, from ozone depletion to biodiversity loss. The driving forces behind these agreements include increasing awareness of environmental issues, scientific advancements leading to better understanding of the complicated network of factors that influence regional and global climates, and the recognition that individual countries or sectors of society cannot effectively tackle these problems on their own.

Economic Growth vs. Environmental Protection: Nations often prioritize economic growth, leading to increased energy consumption, typically from fossil fuels, undermining environmental goals.
National Interests vs. Global Commitments: Countries may withdraw from agreements or dilute commitments to protect their economic interests, as seen with the United States' exit from the Paris Agreement.
Power Dynamics in Negotiations: Developed nations often exert more influence than developing nations, creating an imbalance in addressing global concerns.
Short-Term vs. Long-Term Priorities: Politicians may prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term environmental sustainability, affecting policy decisions.

The industrial revolution, human desire for increased prosperity, less arduous life styles, modern industrial and technological concepts, and the pursuit of global economic domination have resulted in negative consequences for the environment and many of its ecosystems . Over the decades, some radical scientists and activists have emphasized the destructive environmental consequences of many industrial applications of technological advancements. For example, Theodore John Kaczynski (alias Unabomber), a convicted urban terrorist, took extreme direct and unjustified violent actions against industrialization (Washington Post, 1995). On the other hand, numerous legitimate attempts have been made to alert and unite nations in addressing environmental issues synergistically, committing the international community to take tangible steps to mitigate the negative consequences of industrialization and excessive consumerism. These efforts have led to fragmented groups of nations working together, as evidenced by the multinational attendance and pledges made at events such as the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, Kyoto Protocol in 1997, Rio+20 in 2012, the Paris Agreement (COP21), Glasgow Climate Change Conference (COP26; November 2021), the Sharm el-Sheikh Climate Change Conference (COP27; November 2022) and other similar accords.

A Path Forward: Reimagining Climate Action for a Sustainable Future

Evidence shows that climate change is not a conspiracy theory. Environmental obligations determined by multinational conventions are important but insufficient to mitigate the environmental impacts of climate change in a timely manner. Lifestyles and human activities across the world remain driven by self-interest and tend to be dominated by the relentless pressure to achieve short-term economic growth through unsustainable consumerism dependent on unrealistic levels of energy consumption. It's time to go into emergency mode. The question remains: what measures should be taken as part of that emergency mode, and how should decisions be made?

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

Why are international climate agreements, like the Paris Agreement, often considered ineffective?

International climate agreements, such as the Paris Agreement, face challenges due to conflicting economic interests and power dynamics. Nations often prioritize short-term economic growth over long-term environmental sustainability, leading to diluted commitments or withdrawals from agreements. Additionally, developed nations often exert more influence in negotiations, creating an imbalance in addressing global concerns. The focus on national interests often undermines the collective action required for effective climate mitigation.

How do economic interests undermine the success of international environmental agreements, such as the Kyoto Protocol?

Economic interests can significantly undermine the success of international environmental agreements like the Kyoto Protocol because countries may prioritize economic growth over environmental protection. This can manifest as increased energy consumption from fossil fuels, reluctance to commit to emissions reductions, or withdrawal from agreements to protect national industries. The tension between maintaining living standards and reducing emissions creates a complex challenge, where powerful economies can exert disproportionate influence, weakening the overall impact of such agreements.

What role does civil pressure play in ensuring countries adhere to global climate commitments made at events like the Rio Earth Summit?

Civil pressure is crucial in ensuring that countries adhere to global climate commitments made at events like the Rio Earth Summit. Relying solely on traditional political diplomacy often proves insufficient due to inherent biases and conflicting interests. Civil pressure, exerted through public awareness, advocacy, and activism, can hold nations accountable for their pledges and push for the implementation of climate-friendly actions. This bottom-up approach can help overcome the obstacles posed by short-term economic priorities and power imbalances, fostering a transition regime that prioritizes long-term sustainability.

What innovative solutions are proposed to promote climate-friendly actions, considering the shortcomings of past agreements like the Sharm el-Sheikh Climate Change Conference?

Given the shortcomings of past agreements, such as the Sharm el-Sheikh Climate Change Conference, promoting climate-friendly actions requires a paradigm shift that prioritizes acknowledging and adhering to global commitments through civil pressure. Innovative solutions include fostering a 'transition regime' that addresses the metastasizing challenges affecting all nations. This involves a fundamental change in approach, moving away from self-interest and unsustainable consumerism toward a system where decisions are made with long-term environmental sustainability in mind. This also requires holding decision-makers accountable for the damage caused to the planet.

With the understanding that 'environmental obligations determined by multinational conventions are important but insufficient,' what concrete steps should be taken immediately to address climate change in 'emergency mode'?

Given the insufficiency of current measures, concrete steps in 'emergency mode' should involve prioritizing decisions leading to positive climate impacts that have been long overdue. This includes rapidly transitioning away from unsustainable consumerism and unrealistic levels of energy consumption. Actions must ensure no further damage is caused, and future generations aren't left to deal with our failures. Decision-making needs to shift from short-term economic growth to long-term environmental sustainability, emphasizing collective action and shared responsibility.