Interconnected communication symbols forming a bridge, symbolizing AAC intervention research complexities.

AAC Intervention Research: Navigating Complexity and Emerging Trends

"Unlock the potential of augmentative and alternative communication by understanding the latest research complexities and how they lead to more effective interventions."


Intervention, broadly defined, involves modifying a participant's environment to change behavior. In augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), this means intervening to improve communication skills, impacting the user, their family, education, and vocational prospects. AAC intervention research generates new knowledge by systematically studying AAC delivery, paving the way for replication and practical application in clinical and educational settings.

Advancing the field requires creating and evaluating clinically relevant interventions that support the teaching of skills, so individuals can communicate effectively in real-world situations. These interventions must cater to a diverse population with congenital and acquired diagnoses across their lifespan. AAC interventions act as catalysts for change, and AAC intervention research focuses on gaining new knowledge through planned studies that can be replicated and translated into practice.

This article highlights the complexities inherent in AAC intervention research, considering contributing components and broader directions for behavioral sciences. It emphasizes the commitment to understanding how interventions affect change and their broader impact on the field and AAC users.

Understanding AAC Intervention Research Complexity

Interconnected communication symbols forming a bridge, symbolizing AAC intervention research complexities.

The field of AAC has made significant strides in advancing the study of AAC interventions. AAC interventions continue to evolve. It's essential to consider present-day interventions and future needs.

Intervention research should build a strong base of evidence to inform and support clinical and educational practice, which is inherently interdisciplinary and evolving. The relationship between research and practice needs to be mutually informative and beneficial. Research generates new knowledge, and practice consumes it. The challenges of this relationship in AAC are real and reflect the urgency to support AAC and its stakeholders.

  • Theoretical Frameworks: Influence how studies are framed, implemented, and interpreted. Frameworks can be psycholinguistic, behavioral, or communication-based.
  • Research Designs: Have evolved from case studies to single-subject designs and randomized control trials. Some question whether single-subject designs are the only viable option due to the low-incidence and variability in participant populations.
  • Components of Intervention Protocols: Include dosage, frequency, duration, and intensity, as well as the fidelity of the intervention. Studies that manipulate these components can yield impactful outcomes.
  • Measurement of Change: Involves assessing short- and long-term outcomes. Traditional approaches use difference scores between measurement time points, while individual growth curve analyses model a person's response to intervention over time.
In addition, it is important to understand social validity, or how the findings of AAC intervention studies are actually received by other stakeholders. Investigators should attend to how other stakeholders value the effects of interventions.

The Future of AAC Intervention

AAC intervention has evolved significantly over the past 30 years. This article has discussed some of the complexities of AAC intervention research and dimensions unique to AAC interventions, while highlighting emerging trends in research and its dissemination. As with other behavioral interventions, it's important to consider how to integrate these long-standing issues into our studies.

What we need are integrative studies that span multiple dimensions of research design and methods. Integrating all of these dimensions into each AAC intervention study, however, is a challenging task.

Conducting AAC intervention research is not for the faint of heart! It is a time- and labor-intensive commitment to understanding how change occurs when an intervention is delivered, including all the moving parts, and its broader impact on the field and the people who use AAC. We look forward to continuing the conversation and the research!

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1526319, Alternate LINK

Title: The Complexities Of Aac Intervention Research: Emerging Trends To Consider

Subject: Speech and Hearing

Journal: Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Authors: Maryann Romski, Rose A. Sevcik

Published: 2018-10-02

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is an AAC intervention?

AAC intervention involves modifying a person's environment to improve their communication skills. This impacts the AAC user, their family, and their educational and vocational prospects. The purpose is to support people in communicating effectively in real-world scenarios. It considers diverse populations with congenital and acquired diagnoses across their lifespan. These interventions are catalysts for change.

2

How have research designs in AAC intervention changed?

The study of AAC interventions has evolved by the use of various research designs. Initially, research began with case studies. Then, researchers used single-subject designs. Currently, randomized control trials are implemented. Some researchers question if single-subject designs are the only viable option because of the low-incidence and variability of participant populations.

3

Why are theoretical frameworks important in AAC intervention research?

Theoretical frameworks shape how studies are structured, implemented, and understood. These can be psycholinguistic, behavioral, or communication-based. These frameworks provide the lens through which researchers view and interpret the effects of AAC interventions. Choosing a framework influences the questions asked, the methods used, and the conclusions drawn from the research.

4

What are the essential components of intervention protocols, and why are they important?

Components of intervention protocols include dosage, frequency, duration, intensity, and the fidelity of the intervention. Manipulating these components in studies can produce significant outcomes in AAC intervention research. Careful consideration and control of these elements are necessary to understand the intervention's effects and replicate the findings. The measurement of change includes short- and long-term outcomes using difference scores or individual growth curve analyses.

5

What is social validity in the context of AAC intervention?

Social validity relates to how the findings of AAC intervention studies are viewed by other stakeholders. Investigators should consider how other stakeholders value the intervention's effects. This includes family members, educators, and clinicians. Understanding social validity ensures that the research is relevant and applicable to the needs of the AAC user and the broader community supporting them.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.