Crime scene investigator using eye-tracking glasses with visual focus heatmap overlay.

Unlocking Crime Scenes: How Eye Tracking Tech is Revolutionizing Forensic Investigations

Soraya Malik in Law & Justice June 2025 • 4 min read.

"Could eye-tracking technology be the key to understanding how experts spot crucial evidence at crime scenes, leading to more accurate and efficient investigations?"

Criminal investigations hinge on the meticulous examination of crime scenes. The ability to accurately reconstruct events and identify key pieces of evidence is paramount. Law enforcement agencies use crime scene investigators to complete this task. An oversight, a missed clue, or a misinterpretation can have cascading effects, jeopardizing the entire investigation. But what if there was a way to understand how seasoned investigators 'see' a crime scene differently than novices? What if technology could help train new investigators to think, observe, and act like experts?

The traditional methods of assessing investigator proficiency, such as blind testing and case reanalysis, present significant challenges in field applications. The cost and logistical complexity of blind tests, coupled with the limitations of relying solely on documented evidence for reanalysis, have spurred the search for innovative assessment tools. Virtual crime scene simulations offer a potential alternative, but they often lack the realism and interactive elements of real-world investigations, and participants are aware they are being evaluated, which can skew the results.

Enter eye-tracking technology. This method offers a window into the visual attention of investigators as they process a crime scene. By tracking eye movements, researchers can gather quantitative data on fixation patterns, dwell times, and search strategies. This information can then be used to compare the visual behavior of expert and novice investigators, potentially revealing the cognitive processes that underpin expertise in crime scene analysis.

Decoding the Expert Eye: What Eye Tracking Reveals

Crime scene investigator using eye-tracking glasses with visual focus heatmap overlay.

A recent study published in Forensic Science International explored the use of eye-tracking technology to evaluate evidence recognition in crime scene investigations. Researchers Renuka Devi Watalingam, Nicole Richetelli, Jeff B. Pelz, and Jacqueline A. Speir sought to determine whether quantitative eye-tracking data could distinguish between expert and novice crime scene investigators. They recruited 32 participants, categorized them as experts or trained novices based on their experience and education, and had them process a mock crime scene while wearing mobile eye trackers.

The eye trackers recorded various metrics, including visual fixations, durations, search patterns, and reconstruction accuracy. The researchers then compared the data using advanced statistical methods like Earth Mover's Distance (EMD) and the Needleman-Wunsch (N-W) algorithm to identify significant differences between the groups. The results revealed compelling insights:

Search Duration and Sequence: Experts exhibited greater dissimilarity in search duration but greater similarity in search sequences compared to novices.
Reconstruction Accuracy: Experts demonstrated significantly higher reconstruction accuracy than novices, suggesting a superior ability to interpret the scene correctly.
Efficiency: While there was no significant difference in the total time needed to complete the investigation, the combination of higher accuracy and similar time suggests that experts are more efficient in their approach.

The study also highlighted specific areas where experts and novices differed in their visual attention. For example, experts spent more time fixating on critical evidence like blood spatter patterns and cartridge cases, indicating a greater focus on key details. Furthermore, the study revealed that experts, as a group, perform better because their search activities are more dissimilar than novices. While their expertise makes their gaze patterns quite similar, their approaches on how to apply their expertise is quite diverse. This information is vital in improving training and understanding of the processes.

The Future of Forensic Training: A New Vision

This pioneering research provides a foundation for future studies exploring the use of eye trackers to assess expertise in complex and distributed environments. By understanding how experts visually process crime scenes, training programs can be tailored to cultivate similar skills in novice investigators. The insights gleaned from this study could lead to more effective training methodologies, ultimately enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of criminal investigations and strengthening the pursuit of justice.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.08.012, Alternate LINK

Title: Eye Tracking To Evaluate Evidence Recognition In Crime Scene Investigations

Subject: Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Journal: Forensic Science International

Publisher: Elsevier BV

Authors: Renuka Devi Watalingam, Nicole Richetelli, Jeff B. Pelz, Jacqueline A. Speir

Published: 2017-11-01

Everything You Need To Know

How is eye-tracking technology being applied in forensic investigations?

Eye-tracking technology is used in forensic investigations to analyze the visual attention of crime scene investigators. It tracks eye movements to gather data on fixation patterns, dwell times, and search strategies. This data is then used to compare the visual behavior of expert and novice investigators. By understanding these differences, training programs can be developed to cultivate similar skills in novice investigators. This method is meant to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of criminal investigations.

What were the methods and findings of the Forensic Science International study that used eye-tracking in crime scene investigations?

A study published in *Forensic Science International* used eye-tracking technology to evaluate evidence recognition. Researchers Renuka Devi Watalingam, Nicole Richetelli, Jeff B. Pelz, and Jacqueline A. Speir recorded visual fixations, durations, search patterns, and reconstruction accuracy of both expert and novice crime scene investigators while they processed a mock crime scene. They then used Earth Mover's Distance (EMD) and the Needleman-Wunsch (N-W) algorithm to analyze the data. The results showed that experts demonstrated greater dissimilarity in search duration but greater similarity in search sequences, higher reconstruction accuracy, and were more efficient in their approach.

According to the eye-tracking study, what are the key differences in visual behavior between expert and novice crime scene investigators?

The study mentioned indicates that experts exhibit greater dissimilarity in search duration but greater similarity in search sequences. Experts also spend more time fixating on critical evidence, like blood spatter patterns and cartridge cases. Their higher reconstruction accuracy, combined with similar investigation times, suggests they are more efficient. While their expertise makes their gaze patterns quite similar, their approaches on how to apply their expertise is quite diverse. This information is vital in improving training and understanding of the processes.

What are the limitations of traditional methods for assessing investigator proficiency, and how does eye-tracking technology offer an alternative?

The use of eye-tracking technology addresses limitations of traditional methods such as blind testing and case reanalysis, which are costly and logistically complex. Virtual crime scene simulations are another alternative, but they often lack realism and can skew results because participants know they are being evaluated. Eye-tracking offers a more objective measure of visual attention without these drawbacks. However, it does not measure cognitive processes directly, so further research may integrate other methods like verbal protocols to gain a more complete picture of expert cognition.

What are the potential long-term implications of using eye-tracking technology to improve forensic training and investigations?

The findings support future studies exploring the use of eye trackers to assess expertise in complex and distributed environments. By understanding how experts visually process crime scenes, training programs can be tailored to cultivate similar skills in novice investigators. Also, the use of mobile eye trackers means this could be used in real crime scenes not just mock crime scenes. This will enhance the accuracy and efficiency of criminal investigations and strengthen the pursuit of justice. This could also lead to development of AI systems that guide investigators at a crime scene, thus using the technology to solve crime more efficiently and accurately.