A reinforced concrete knee joint failing under earthquake stress, with a cityscape in the background.

Seismic Shocks: Are Our Concrete Knees Weakening?

Author's portrait.
Soraya Malik in Tech & Innovation September 2025 • 4 min read.

"New research reveals how vulnerable reinforced concrete knee joints are under earthquake stress, challenging current construction standards."


When an earthquake strikes, the ground isn't the only thing that trembles; buildings are put to the ultimate test of survival. Among the most critical, yet often overlooked, structural components are beam-column joints, specifically the 'knee joints' found in reinforced concrete buildings. These joints, unlike their more conventional counterparts, face unique forces that can lead to unexpected and catastrophic failures.

Imagine the forces at play during a seismic event. Knee joints, typically found at the roof level of buildings, are subjected to simultaneous closing and opening actions. These actions, combined with axial forces from adjoining members, create a complex stress environment. What makes it even more concerning is that current design codes often treat these knee joints as conventional joints, potentially overlooking their distinct vulnerabilities.

Now, a groundbreaking study is shedding light on this critical issue. Researchers have delved into the cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete knee joints, examining how they respond to the variable stresses induced by seismic activity. This research doesn't just point out a problem; it proposes concrete solutions to enhance the safety and resilience of our buildings.

Why Knee Joints Are the Weak Link in Earthquake Resistance

A reinforced concrete knee joint failing under earthquake stress, with a cityscape in the background.

Reinforced concrete beam-column knee joints differ significantly from conventional joints due to the unique forces they endure and the shear-resisting mechanisms that develop within them. The simultaneous closing and opening actions caused by seismic events make knee joints particularly susceptible to brittle failure. To fully grasp the cyclic behavior of these joints, researchers conducted tests on six reinforced concrete specimens, each designed to produce varying joint closing and opening shear stresses under reversed cyclic loading.

The test specimens were divided into three groups, each with two specimens, based on the angles of their diagonal concrete struts. This approach allowed researchers to analyze how closing and opening actions interact and affect the overall shear degradation of knee joints subjected to cyclic loading. The findings revealed a concerning trend: specimens with high opening shear stresses failed prematurely, while those with lower opening shear stresses managed to reach recommended shear capacity values.

Here’s what the research revealed about the vulnerabilities of knee joints:
  • Closing vs. Opening Actions: The study highlighted that the current practice of using closing shear strength as a direct representation of overall joint behavior is potentially unconservative. The contribution of opening actions to overall joint degradation is often overlooked.
  • Code Overestimation: The research indicated that current design codes severely overestimate the shear capacity of knee joints, emphasizing the need for revised guidelines.
  • Joint Reinforcement: The effectiveness of joint reinforcement varies; it has a more significant impact on opening actions compared to closing actions.
These insights challenge the long-held assumptions in structural engineering and underscore the urgent need to refine design methodologies for knee joints. The safety of our buildings, and the people who inhabit them, depends on it.

The Path Forward: Designing Stronger, Safer Structures

The study's findings suggest that current ACI352R-02 guidelines may be unconservative for knee joints, particularly under high opening shear stresses. Therefore, the researchers recommend reducing the ACI352R-02 recommended joint shear capacity by 15% in closing and 30% in opening. These adjustments aim to account for the combined effects of closing and opening actions on the cyclic behavior of knee joints. The results of this study could help in the making safer buildings for the future.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

Why are reinforced concrete knee joints in buildings particularly vulnerable during earthquakes?

Reinforced concrete knee joints are more vulnerable because they experience unique forces from simultaneous closing and opening actions during seismic events, combined with axial forces. This complex stress environment isn't always adequately addressed by current design codes, which often treat these joints as conventional joints, potentially overlooking their distinct vulnerabilities and leading to catastrophic failures.

2

How does the behavior of a knee joint differ from that of a conventional beam-column joint during an earthquake?

Knee joints, typically found at the roof level, undergo simultaneous closing and opening actions, creating a more complex stress environment compared to conventional joints. This makes them more susceptible to brittle failure. Conventional beam-column joints do not typically experience the same magnitude of simultaneous closing and opening forces, so knee joints require a different design consideration.

3

What specific vulnerabilities of knee joints were revealed by the recent research on seismic activity?

The research highlighted that using closing shear strength to represent overall joint behavior is potentially unconservative, as the contribution of opening actions to joint degradation is often overlooked. It also indicated that current design codes overestimate the shear capacity of knee joints. Furthermore, the effectiveness of joint reinforcement varies, with a more significant impact on opening actions compared to closing actions.

4

What are the implications of the research findings on the current ACI352R-02 guidelines for building design?

The study suggests that current ACI352R-02 guidelines may be unconservative for knee joints, particularly under high opening shear stresses. To address this, researchers recommend reducing the ACI352R-02 recommended joint shear capacity by 15% in closing and 30% in opening to better account for the combined effects of closing and opening actions on the cyclic behavior of knee joints. This adjustment aims to improve the safety and resilience of structures in seismically active areas.

5

How does shear stress from 'opening actions' affect the structural integrity of reinforced concrete knee joints, and why is this important for building safety?

High opening shear stresses significantly contribute to the premature failure of reinforced concrete knee joints during seismic events. Unlike 'closing actions', the impact of 'opening actions' on joint degradation is often underestimated by current design codes. The inability to properly account for 'opening actions' leads to an overestimation of a knee joint's shear capacity, which is critical to buildings standing up to seismic events. By ignoring or underestimating the effect of 'opening actions', engineers could miscalculate the amount of shear reinforcement needed, leading to structural weaknesses and posing a considerable safety risk.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.