Surreal eye of surgeon examining cellular bladder landscape.

Second Look, Second Chance? How a Repeat TURBT Can Change the Game for Bladder Cancer

"Could a second TURBT be a game-changer in predicting recurrence and progression in pT1HG bladder cancer? A single-center study says it's worth considering."


Bladder cancer is tricky. Initial diagnosis via transurethral resection (TURBT) can sometimes miss the full extent of the disease, a phenomenon known as understaging. This can lead to delays in getting the right treatment, especially for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

So, what's the solution? A repeat TURBT, also known as re-cTURBT, comes into play. Studies show that re-cTURBT can reveal upstaging in a significant number of patients, meaning the cancer is more advanced than initially thought. In some cases, this upstaging rate can be as high as 49% when the first sample doesn't include muscle tissue.

A recent study investigated the value of re-cTURBT in patients with pT1HG (high-grade T1) bladder cancer. The goal was to determine if a second resection could help predict recurrence and progression by identifying residual tumors.

Why a Second Look Matters: Re-cTURBT and Identifying Hidden Risks

Surreal eye of surgeon examining cellular bladder landscape.

The study, conducted at a single center, involved 285 patients who underwent TURBT for bladder cancer between January 2011 and December 2015. Among them, 92 patients were diagnosed with pT1HG. Following European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines, these patients underwent a second TURBT (WLre-cTURBT) 4-6 weeks after the initial procedure.

After the second resection, researchers observed that:

  • A persistent disease was found in 18 (19.5%) patients.
  • 14 (15.2%) had high-grade NMIBC.
  • 4 (4.3%) were diagnosed with high-grade muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
During the follow-up, recurrence was observed in 36 out of 92 patients (39.1%), and progression occurred in 14 patients (15.2%). The study also revealed that patients with persistent disease after re-cTURBT had a higher recurrence rate compared to those with no residual tumor (pT0).

The Takeaway: Re-cTURBT as a Valuable Tool

This research suggests that re-cTURBT is a valuable tool in managing high-risk NMIBC. By identifying persistent disease and accurately staging bladder cancer, re-cTURBT can help doctors make more informed decisions about treatment. The study highlights the need to consider re-cTURBT in patients with newly diagnosed, high-grade T1 bladder cancer.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.4081/aiua.2017.4.272, Alternate LINK

Title: Can Re-Cturbt Be Useful In Pt1Hg Disease As A Risk Indicator Of Recurrence And Progression? A Single Centre Experience

Subject: Urology

Journal: Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia

Publisher: PAGEPress Publications

Authors: Roberto Giulianelli, Barbara Cristina Gentile, Gabriella Mirabile, Luca Albanesi, Paola Tariciotti, Giorgio Rizzo, Maurizio Buscarini, Mauro Vermiglio

Published: 2017-12-31

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is a TURBT, and why is it important in the context of bladder cancer?

TURBT, or transurethral resection, is a procedure used for the initial diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. It involves removing tumors from the bladder lining. However, it sometimes doesn't capture the full extent of the disease, leading to understaging. This is significant because inaccurate staging can result in inappropriate treatment strategies, especially for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Understaging can lead to delays in administering the right treatment, potentially affecting patient outcomes. A more accurate assessment of the cancer's stage is critical for effective management.

2

What is a re-cTURBT, and why is it significant in managing bladder cancer?

Re-cTURBT, or repeat transurethral resection, is a second TURBT procedure performed after the initial one. It is important because it helps identify any remaining cancer cells or upstaging that the initial TURBT might have missed. This is especially crucial in high-risk NMIBC, where accurate staging is vital for effective treatment planning. Re-cTURBT helps in identifying persistent disease and ensures that the cancer is appropriately staged. In some instances, the upstaging rate can be significant, particularly when the initial TURBT sample did not include muscle tissue.

3

Who are pT1HG bladder cancer patients, and why were they the focus of this study?

The study focused on patients diagnosed with pT1HG bladder cancer, which refers to high-grade T1 tumors. This is significant because high-grade T1 bladder cancer carries a higher risk of recurrence and progression compared to lower-grade tumors. These patients often require more aggressive management strategies. The study aimed to evaluate if a second TURBT (re-cTURBT) could improve the prediction of recurrence and progression in this specific group by identifying any residual tumors that were not detected during the initial TURBT.

4

What are the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines, and why are they relevant to this discussion?

The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines recommend a second TURBT (re-cTURBT) for patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), including those with pT1HG tumors. Following these guidelines ensures that patients receive the standard of care and that any residual tumors or upstaging are identified. Adhering to EAU guidelines is important as it helps standardize treatment approaches and improves patient outcomes by providing a framework for optimal management based on current evidence.

5

What were the key findings of the study regarding re-cTURBT and its impact on patient outcomes?

The study found that a persistent disease was present in 19.5% of patients after re-cTURBT. Additionally, 15.2% had high-grade NMIBC, and 4.3% were diagnosed with high-grade muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). These findings are significant because they demonstrate that re-cTURBT can reveal a considerable number of patients with residual disease or upstaging that was not detected in the initial TURBT. The study also revealed that patients with persistent disease after re-cTURBT had a higher recurrence rate compared to those with no residual tumor, emphasizing the value of re-cTURBT in predicting recurrence and progression.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.