Paths to Myasthenia Gravis Treatment: Choosing Between Traditional and Minimally Invasive Surgery

Myasthenia Gravis: Is Minimally Invasive Surgery Right for You?

Author's portrait.
Elliot Brynn in Health & Wellness December 2025 • 4 min read.

"Explore the Latest Research on Minimally Invasive Approaches for Treating Non-Thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis and Make an Informed Decision About Your Health"


Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune neuromuscular disease that causes weakness in the skeletal muscles, which are responsible for breathing and moving parts of the body. While there's no cure, various treatments can help manage symptoms, allowing individuals to lead fulfilling lives. Traditional treatments often include medications and, in some cases, surgery, particularly thymectomy (removal of the thymus gland).

Traditionally, thymectomy was performed via complete sternotomy, a procedure involving a large incision down the center of the chest. While effective, this approach can result in significant post-operative pain, a lengthy recovery period, and noticeable scarring. In recent years, minimally invasive surgical techniques have emerged as alternatives, aiming to reduce these drawbacks.

These newer methods, such as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), involve smaller incisions, potentially leading to less pain, quicker recovery, and improved cosmetic results. However, questions remain about whether these minimally invasive approaches are as effective as traditional sternotomy for all patients with MG.

Minimally Invasive vs. Traditional Thymectomy: What Does the Research Say?

Paths to Myasthenia Gravis Treatment: Choosing Between Traditional and Minimally Invasive Surgery

A research study published in Abstracts/Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, investigated the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive surgical approaches compared to the traditional cervicotomy with upper sternotomy (C-US) for non-thymomatous MG. The study, titled "Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches for the Treatment of Non-Thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis: A Comparative Propensity-Score Adjusted Multicentre Study," aimed to provide insights into the effectiveness and safety of these different surgical techniques.

The study involved a retrospective analysis of 267 patients with non-thymomatous MG who underwent surgery at two European thoracic surgery centers between 1990 and 2015. The researchers compared the outcomes of patients who underwent C-US, VATS, and RATS, focusing on key indicators such as remission rate, improvement in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical status, and reduction or suspension of steroid treatment.

  • Cervicotomy with Upper Sternotomy (C-US): This traditional approach involves an incision in the neck combined with a partial split of the sternum (breastbone).
  • Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS): VATS is a minimally invasive technique that uses small incisions and a video camera to guide the surgeon.
  • Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS): RATS is another minimally invasive approach that utilizes a surgical robot to enhance precision and control during the procedure.
The results of the study indicated that there was no significant difference in remission rate or improvement of MGFA clinical status between the minimally invasive approaches (RATS/VATS) and the traditional C-US method. Specifically, the study found that MGFA clinical-status improved in 89% (186/209) of the patients and remission of symptoms was observed in 42% (87/209). Furthermore, 47% (32/68) of patients were able to suspend/reduce steroid treatment. The research suggests that RATS/VATS had similar clinical outcomes compared to C-US.

Making an Informed Decision: Discussing Surgical Options with Your Doctor

If you're living with non-thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis, it's essential to discuss all available treatment options with your healthcare team. Minimally invasive surgical techniques like VATS and RATS offer potential benefits, such as reduced pain and quicker recovery. While research suggests these approaches are comparable to traditional methods in terms of clinical outcomes, the best choice depends on individual factors, including your overall health, preferences, and the expertise available at your medical center. This information can empower you to have a more informed discussion with your doctor, leading to the best possible care plan for your unique needs.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is Myasthenia Gravis, and what does it do?

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune neuromuscular disease. It causes weakness in the skeletal muscles, which are responsible for movement and breathing. While there's no cure, various treatments help manage symptoms, allowing individuals to lead fulfilling lives. The disease's impact stems from the body's immune system mistakenly attacking the communication between nerves and muscles, causing debilitating muscle weakness.

2

What are the benefits of minimally invasive surgical techniques like VATS and RATS?

Minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) and Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS), offer alternatives to traditional methods like Cervicotomy with Upper Sternotomy (C-US). These approaches use smaller incisions, potentially leading to less pain, quicker recovery, and improved cosmetic results. Their significance lies in the potential to improve patient experience and reduce the drawbacks associated with the more invasive C-US method. The implications include a shift towards less invasive procedures for treating Myasthenia Gravis, enhancing recovery and potentially improving overall quality of life.

3

What is Cervicotomy with Upper Sternotomy (C-US), and why is it important?

Cervicotomy with Upper Sternotomy (C-US) is a traditional surgical approach involving an incision in the neck combined with a partial split of the sternum (breastbone). It's been a standard method for procedures like thymectomy in treating Myasthenia Gravis. Its importance is in its historical use and established effectiveness. Implications include significant post-operative pain, a lengthy recovery period, and noticeable scarring, prompting the development of less invasive techniques such as VATS and RATS.

4

How do Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) and Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) work?

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) and Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) are minimally invasive techniques used in treating Myasthenia Gravis. VATS uses small incisions and a video camera to guide the surgeon, while RATS utilizes a surgical robot to enhance precision and control. These methods are significant because they aim to reduce the drawbacks of traditional approaches like C-US, potentially leading to less pain, quicker recovery, and better cosmetic outcomes. The implication is a shift toward less invasive procedures, potentially improving patient outcomes and experience.

5

What were the key findings of the research comparing VATS, RATS, and C-US for Myasthenia Gravis?

The research study compared the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive surgical approaches (VATS and RATS) to the traditional Cervicotomy with Upper Sternotomy (C-US) for non-thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis. The study's importance is in providing insights into the effectiveness and safety of different surgical techniques. The implications are that the study found similar clinical outcomes between RATS/VATS and C-US, with no significant differences in remission rates or improvement in Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical status, which helps patients and doctors make informed decisions about treatment options.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.