Convergence of digital and traditional pathology

Digital Pathology: Is It Really Faster Than Traditional Methods?

Author's portrait.
Lena Voss in Health & Wellness August 2025 • 4 min read.

"Uncover the efficiency of digital pathology in diagnosis, comparing it to traditional microscopy for quicker and accurate results. Find out how this tech affects healthcare."


In the fast-evolving world of healthcare, technology continually offers new ways to improve diagnostic processes. Digital pathology, which involves analyzing digital images of tissue samples, is emerging as a promising alternative to traditional microscopy. But does it really deliver on its promise of increased efficiency?

Traditionally, pathologists examine tissue samples under a microscope to diagnose diseases like cancer. This method, while reliable, can be time-consuming and prone to human error. Digital pathology aims to streamline this process by digitizing slides, allowing pathologists to view and analyze them on a computer screen. This offers advantages such as remote access, image analysis tools, and the ability to share cases easily with colleagues.

The key question is whether these technological advancements translate into real-world time savings. A recent study published in the American Journal of Surgical Pathology sought to answer this question by comparing the efficiency of digital pathology to traditional microscopy in diagnosing surgical pathology cases. The results offer valuable insights for healthcare professionals considering adopting digital pathology solutions.

The Study: Digital vs. Optical Assessment

Convergence of digital and traditional pathology

The study, conducted by Anne M. Mills, MD, and colleagues at the University of Virginia, meticulously compared the diagnostic efficiency of digital pathology versus optical microscopy. The research involved 510 surgical pathology cases across five organ systems: gastrointestinal, gynecologic, liver, bladder, and brain. Crucially, original diagnoses were independently confirmed by two validating pathologists to ensure accuracy.

The process involved digitizing diagnostic slides using the Philips IntelliSite Pathology Solution. Three experienced pathologists then independently assessed each case using both digital and optical methods, with a washout period of at least six weeks between modalities to prevent bias. The assessment times for each modality were carefully recorded, including the time required to load the digital images.

Here’s a quick summary of the study's methodology:
  • 510 surgical pathology cases were analyzed.
  • Diagnoses were confirmed by validating pathologists.
  • Digital slides were created using the Philips IntelliSite system.
  • Three pathologists assessed cases using both digital and optical methods.
The study revealed that diagnostic accuracy was comparable between the two methods. The average major discordance rates were similar, with 4.4% for digital pathology and 4.9% for optical microscopy. However, the real point of interest was the assessment times. On average, digital assessment times ranged from 1.2 to 9.1 seconds slower than optical microscopy.

The Future of Digital Diagnostics

In conclusion, the study suggests that digital pathology offers comparable efficiency to traditional microscopy, especially as pathologists gain experience with digital platforms. The potential for enhanced electronic chart access and quantitative assessments further solidifies digital pathology's role in modern healthcare. As technology advances and becomes more integrated into diagnostic workflows, we can anticipate even greater efficiency gains and improved patient outcomes.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is digital pathology, and how does it differ from traditional microscopy?

Digital pathology involves analyzing digital images of tissue samples, offering advantages like remote access and image analysis tools. It's an alternative to traditional microscopy, where pathologists examine tissue samples under a microscope. The key difference is the use of digitized slides viewed on a computer screen versus direct examination through a microscope lens.

2

According to the study, how does the diagnostic accuracy and assessment time of digital pathology compare to that of optical microscopy?

The study showed that diagnostic accuracy was comparable between digital pathology and optical microscopy, with similar major discordance rates (4.4% and 4.9%, respectively). However, digital assessment times were slightly slower, ranging from 1.2 to 9.1 seconds longer on average. This suggests that while accuracy isn't compromised, speed might initially be a factor during the transition to digital methods.

3

What role did the Philips IntelliSite Pathology Solution play in the study, and how does it facilitate digital pathology?

The Philips IntelliSite Pathology Solution was used to digitize diagnostic slides in the study. This system enables the creation of high-resolution digital images from traditional glass slides, facilitating their review and analysis on computer screens. While the Philips IntelliSite system was used in this study, other systems exist with similiar capabilities.

4

How might the adoption of digital pathology impact collaboration and access to specialist opinions in diagnostic processes?

The use of digital pathology could improve collaborative diagnostics. Digital slides can be easily shared with colleagues for second opinions or expert consultations, regardless of their physical location. Also quantitative assessments and enhanced electronic chart access may also further solidify digital pathology's role in modern healthcare.

5

What are some potential challenges and future considerations for the broader implementation of digital pathology in healthcare settings?

While digital pathology shows promise, challenges such as the initial investment in technology, the learning curve for pathologists, and the integration with existing laboratory information systems need to be addressed. Additionally, issues related to data storage, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance are crucial for widespread adoption. Future advancements should focus on addressing these challenges to fully realize the potential of digital pathology.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.