A brain made of DNA, representing genetic risk for Alzheimer's.

Decoding Alzheimer's: Can a Genetic Score Predict Your Brain's Future?

"New research explores how a risk-weighted polygenic score, factoring in genes like APOE, can forecast cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's."


Alzheimer's disease (AD) looms large in the landscape of age-related health concerns, with its complex genetic roots accounting for a significant 60-80% of the disease's heritability. While the APOE gene has long been recognized as a major player, scientists have been working tirelessly to uncover the remaining genetic factors that contribute to AD risk. Understanding these factors could unlock new avenues for early detection and personalized prevention strategies.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have emerged as powerful tools in the quest to identify genes linked to AD. While these studies have pinpointed various genetic variants associated with the disease, their individual impact often pales in comparison to APOE. This has led researchers to explore polygenic risk scores (PRSs), which combine the effects of multiple genes to estimate an individual's overall risk of developing AD.

Now, a new study delves into the potential of AD-risk-weighted PRSs to predict cognitive decline in the early, preclinical stages of the disease. By analyzing data from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) Study of Ageing, the research aims to validate whether these genetic scores can truly forecast an individual's cognitive trajectory, offering insights into who might benefit most from early interventions.

Unlocking the Code: How Genetic Risk Scores Work

A brain made of DNA, representing genetic risk for Alzheimer's.

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are calculated by aggregating the influence of multiple genetic variants, each associated with a particular trait or disease. In the context of Alzheimer's, these scores aim to capture the cumulative impact of numerous genes, each contributing a small piece to the overall risk puzzle. Unlike simply counting risk alleles, most advanced PRSs weight each allele based on its effect size, often derived from large-scale GWAS.

The study under review focused on a 22-variant PRS, both with and without the inclusion of the APOE gene. The goal was to assess how well these scores correlated with key AD biomarkers, such as:

  • Brain amyloid-β (Aβ) burden, measured via PET imaging
  • Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of Aβ42, total-tau, and phospho-tau
  • Cognitive performance, assessed through composite measures of global cognition, verbal episodic memory, and a Pre-Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC)
By comparing the PRS to these biomarkers, the researchers sought to determine whether the genetic risk scores could predict not only the presence of AD pathology but also the rate of cognitive decline over time. This longitudinal approach is crucial for understanding the potential of PRSs to identify individuals at highest risk during the silent, preclinical phase of AD.

The Future of Prediction: Where Do We Go From Here?

This study sheds light on the potential, and the limitations, of using AD-risk-weighted PRSs for predicting cognitive decline. While the inclusion of APOE significantly improved the predictive power of the scores, it also highlighted the need for APOE-independent markers. The research suggests that simply focusing on AD risk factors may not fully capture the complexities of cognitive decline, especially in the early stages of the disease.

Further research is needed to refine PRSs, incorporating a broader range of genetic variants and weighting them based on their specific impact on cognitive trajectories. Including genes associated with cognitive performance, beyond just AD risk, could enhance the accuracy of these predictive tools. Additionally, exploring different statistical methods and larger, more diverse cohorts will be crucial for validating and improving the generalizability of PRS.

Ultimately, the goal is to develop PRSs that can accurately identify individuals at high risk of cognitive decline, enabling timely interventions and personalized prevention strategies. As our understanding of the genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease evolves, these predictive tools hold promise for transforming the way we approach this devastating illness.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.3233/jad-180713, Alternate LINK

Title: Utility Of An Alzheimer’S Disease Risk-Weighted Polygenic Risk Score For Predicting Rates Of Cognitive Decline In Preclinical Alzheimer’S Disease: A Prospective Longitudinal Study

Subject: Psychiatry and Mental health

Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Publisher: IOS Press

Authors: Tenielle Porter, Samantha C. Burnham, Lidija Milicic, Greg Savage, Paul Maruff, Yen Ying Lim, Qiao-Xin Li, David Ames, Colin L. Masters, Stephanie Rainey-Smith, Christopher C. Rowe, Olivier Salvado, David Groth, Giuseppe Verdile, Victor L. Villemagne, Simon M. Laws

Published: 2018-11-23

Everything You Need To Know

1

What role does APOE play in Alzheimer's disease?

The APOE gene has long been recognized as a major player in Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. Its presence is a significant factor, but scientists are striving to uncover the remaining genetic factors that contribute to AD risk. Understanding these factors could unlock new avenues for early detection and personalized prevention strategies.

2

What are polygenic risk scores (PRSs) and how do they work?

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are calculated by aggregating the influence of multiple genetic variants, each associated with a particular trait or disease, like Alzheimer's. These scores aim to capture the cumulative impact of numerous genes, each contributing a small piece to the overall risk puzzle. Unlike simply counting risk alleles, most advanced PRSs weight each allele based on its effect size, often derived from large-scale GWAS.

3

What study was used to validate the use of genetic scores, and what did it measure?

The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) Study of Ageing data was used to validate whether genetic scores can forecast an individual's cognitive trajectory. It offers insights into who might benefit most from early interventions. The study measured Brain amyloid-β (Aβ) burden, Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of Aβ42, total-tau, and phospho-tau, and Cognitive performance.

4

Why is a longitudinal approach important in studying genetic risk scores?

By comparing the PRS to these biomarkers, the researchers sought to determine whether the genetic risk scores could predict not only the presence of AD pathology but also the rate of cognitive decline over time. This longitudinal approach is crucial for understanding the potential of PRSs to identify individuals at highest risk during the silent, preclinical phase of AD.

5

What were the key findings regarding APOE and the prediction of cognitive decline?

The study found that the inclusion of APOE significantly improved the predictive power of the scores, but also highlighted the need for APOE-independent markers. The research suggests that simply focusing on AD risk factors may not fully capture the complexities of cognitive decline, especially in the early stages of the disease.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.