Hand planting a seedling in a sustainable community.

Beyond Approval: Why Understanding What People Actually Do Matters for the Planet

"Uncover the hidden power of descriptive norms in environmental conservation and how they can revolutionize our approach to behavior change."


We often assume that knowing what people approve of is enough to shape behavior. Environmental campaigns frequently focus on highlighting the benefits of eco-friendly actions and emphasizing social approval for those who participate. However, what if this is only half the story? What if understanding what people actually do—their descriptive norms—holds the key to unlocking widespread environmental action?

The traditional approach to understanding social norms often relies on measuring approval or acceptability. Methods like the Return Potential Model (RPM) quantify belief structures by aggregating personal ratings of how acceptable a particular behavior is. But this approach overlooks a crucial dimension of normative belief: the descriptive aspect. Descriptive norms encompass beliefs about what behaviors are common or typical. They reflect what we observe others doing, influencing our own choices often unconsciously.

Imagine a community where everyone approves of recycling, yet only a few actually do it. Focusing solely on approval might lead to ineffective campaigns. Incorporating descriptive norms – highlighting how many people are already recycling – could be the missing ingredient to encourage wider participation.

The Power of Descriptive Norms: More Than Just Approval

Hand planting a seedling in a sustainable community.

A recent study delved into the importance of descriptive norms in the context of aquatic invasive species (AIS) mitigation. Researchers investigated boaters' beliefs about actions designed to prevent the spread of these harmful species. Traditionally, such studies focus on whether boaters approve of practices like cleaning, draining, and drying their equipment. This study went further by also measuring boaters’ perceptions of how common these behaviors are.

The findings revealed a significant gap between approval and commonness. While boaters generally approved of AIS mitigation behaviors, they didn't necessarily believe these behaviors were widely practiced. This disconnect highlights a critical insight: people may support an action in principle, but their likelihood of engaging in it is heavily influenced by their perception of how common it is among their peers.
This research underscores several key takeaways for environmental initiatives:
  • Beyond Awareness: It's not enough to simply raise awareness and approval. Campaigns must also address perceptions of commonness.
  • Highlight the Positive: Showcase existing examples of widespread sustainable behavior to create a positive descriptive norm.
  • Address Misperceptions: Correct any misperceptions about how common a behavior actually is. Often, people underestimate the prevalence of pro-environmental actions.
  • Tailor Interventions: Design interventions that specifically target descriptive norms to encourage behavior change.
Consider a campaign promoting water conservation. Instead of just emphasizing the importance of saving water, the campaign could highlight that “70% of your neighbors are already using water-efficient showerheads.” This approach leverages the power of descriptive norms to make water conservation seem like a common and expected behavior.

The Future of Norm Research: A More Complete Picture

By incorporating descriptive norms into our understanding of environmental behavior, we gain a more complete and nuanced picture. This expanded perspective allows for more effective interventions that bridge the gap between approval and action, ultimately leading to greater adoption of sustainable practices and a healthier planet.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.