Distorted mirrors reflecting fragmented images, symbolizing cognitive biases.

Are Your Beliefs Biased? Uncover the Hidden Traps in How You Process Information

Jordan Keane in Mind & Education June 2025 • 4 min read.

"New research reveals how optimism, pessimism, and even the gambler's fallacy can distort your perception of reality – and what you can do about it."

We like to think we're logical beings, carefully weighing evidence before arriving at a decision. But what if the very way we process information is subtly warped? Decades of research have shown that cognitive biases – systematic patterns of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment – are far more pervasive than we realize. These biases can influence everything from our investment choices to our political opinions, often without us even being aware of their influence.

While many individual biases have been identified and studied, a comprehensive understanding of how they interact and influence each other has remained elusive. Traditional methods of measuring beliefs often fall short, making it difficult to disentangle the complex web of cognitive distortions that shape our perceptions. Imagine, for example, someone who consistently overestimates their abilities. Is this due to simple overconfidence, a tendency to neglect base rates (prior probabilities), or a deeper-seated optimism bias?

Now, a groundbreaking new study offers a more unified approach to understanding belief biases. By focusing on how individuals update their beliefs in response to new information, rather than simply measuring point-belief estimates, researchers have developed a model that can identify multiple conflicting biases within a single framework. The findings reveal a surprising degree of individual heterogeneity and highlight the critical roles of motivated beliefs and sequence-related biases in shaping our judgments.

Decoding the Biases: How Your Mind Tricks You

Distorted mirrors reflecting fragmented images, symbolizing cognitive biases.

The researchers, led by Pedro Gonzalez-Fernandez from Maastricht University, developed a theoretical model that allows for the separate identification of several well-known cognitive biases. The key innovation lies in measuring belief distributions – the range of possibilities a person considers – rather than focusing on single-point estimates. This approach provides a richer understanding of how beliefs are updated in response to new information.

The model incorporates a range of biases, including:

Over/Under-inference: Reacting too strongly or weakly to new evidence.
Base Rate Neglect/Overuse: Ignoring or overemphasizing prior probabilities.
Confirmation Bias: Favoring information that confirms existing beliefs.
Optimism/Pessimism Bias: Skewing beliefs based on desired outcomes.
Gambler's Fallacy/Hot Hand Fallacy: Believing past events influence independent future outcomes.
Over/Underconfidence: Having an exaggerated or diminished sense of certainty.

To test their model, the researchers conducted a laboratory experiment where participants had to guess the percentage of red balls in a hidden urn, receiving information through a series of ball draws. Participants reported their belief distributions before and after each draw, allowing the researchers to track how their beliefs evolved. The results revealed significant individual differences, with each participant exhibiting at least one identifiable bias. Motivated beliefs (optimism and pessimism) and sequence-related biases (gambler's fallacy and hot hand fallacy) emerged as key drivers of biased inference, while base rate neglect persisted at the population level.

Why This Matters: Implications for Your Life

Understanding how belief biases influence our thinking is the first step towards making more rational decisions. By recognizing our tendencies to be overly optimistic, fall prey to the gambler's fallacy, or selectively filter information, we can begin to counteract these biases. This research provides a valuable toolkit for individuals and organizations seeking to improve their judgment and decision-making processes. Future research promises to delve deeper into the cognitive mechanisms underlying these biases, potentially leading to more effective interventions and strategies for mitigating their impact.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

What are cognitive biases, and why should I be concerned about them?

Cognitive biases are systematic deviations from rational judgment that can subtly warp how we process information. These biases, such as optimism bias, pessimism bias, and the gambler's fallacy, influence everything from investment choices to political opinions, often without us realizing it. Understanding them is crucial because they can lead to skewed perceptions and poor decision-making. While this explains a few, there are also biases such as over/under inference, base rate neglect/overuse, confirmation bias, over/under confidence that also impact our decision making.

How does the new research from Maastricht University provide a more unified approach to understanding belief biases?

The research, led by Pedro Gonzalez-Fernandez, offers a unified approach by measuring belief distributions rather than single-point estimates. This allows for the identification of multiple conflicting biases within a single framework. The model incorporates biases such as over/under-inference, base rate neglect/overuse, confirmation bias, optimism/pessimism bias, gambler's fallacy/hot hand fallacy, and over/underconfidence. By tracking how beliefs are updated in response to new information, the model reveals individual differences and the roles of motivated beliefs and sequence-related biases.

Can you explain the difference between the gambler's fallacy and the hot hand fallacy, and how they impact our decisions?

Both the gambler's fallacy and the hot hand fallacy are sequence-related biases affecting our perception of independent events. The gambler's fallacy is the mistaken belief that if something happens more frequently than normal during a given period, it will happen less frequently in the future (or vice versa). The hot hand fallacy is the belief that a person who has experienced success with a random event has a greater chance of further success. Both can lead to irrational decisions, such as making incorrect bets based on perceived patterns in random sequences. For example if an urn has a series of red balls drawn one might think that blue balls are now more likely or if a series of red balls are drawn one might think more red balls will follow.

What is base rate neglect, and how does it affect our judgment?

Base rate neglect is a cognitive bias where people tend to ignore or underemphasize prior probabilities (base rates) when making judgments, focusing instead on specific information presented, even if that information is less relevant. This bias can lead to inaccurate assessments of likelihood and poor decision-making. The study indicated that base rate neglect persisted at the population level. The opposite can also occur where base rates are over emphasized.

How can recognizing biases like optimism bias and the gambler's fallacy improve decision-making in real-life scenarios?

Recognizing biases like optimism bias and the gambler's fallacy is the first step toward more rational decisions. Optimism bias, the tendency to skew beliefs based on desired outcomes, can lead to unrealistic expectations and poor planning. The gambler's fallacy, believing past events influence independent future outcomes, can result in misguided investments or bets. By understanding these biases, individuals and organizations can counteract them, leading to more informed choices. For instance, awareness of optimism bias can encourage more realistic project assessments, while recognizing the gambler's fallacy can prevent irrational betting strategies.