A diverse group of migrants protected by a vaccine shield, symbolizing vaccine equity in the EU.

Vaccine Equity: Bridging the Gap for Newly Arrived Migrants in Europe

"A systematic review reveals strategies to improve vaccination uptake and cost-effectiveness among newly arrived migrants in the EU/EEA, ensuring healthier communities for all."


In an increasingly interconnected world, migration has become a defining feature of modern societies. With over 258 million people migrating across international borders and an additional 763 million migrating internally, ensuring the health and well-being of migrant populations is a critical public health priority. In the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA), the influx of refugees and migrants between 2014 and 2016, coupled with internal migration, has created unprecedented challenges for healthcare systems.

Vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) pose a significant threat, particularly among newly arrived migrants who may be under-immunized or lack documentation of previous vaccinations. Measles and polio outbreaks in the EU/EEA have been linked to under-immunized migrant populations, highlighting the urgent need for effective vaccination strategies. However, seroprevalence studies have revealed sub-optimal immunity to VPDs among both adult and child migrants, underscoring the complexity of the issue.

Recognizing the critical need for targeted interventions, a systematic review was conducted to explore strategies for improving vaccination uptake and cost-effectiveness among newly arrived migrants in the EU/EEA. This review, conforming to PRISMA guidelines, sought to identify interventions that increase vaccine uptake and assess the cost-effectiveness of vaccination strategies in this vulnerable population.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Measuring the Immunization Gap

The WHO Immunization Data portal provides global, regional, and country summaries of vaccine-preventable disease cases, vaccination coverage, immunization-program indicators, vaccine introductions, and vaccination schedules. A 2022 systematic review describes migrants as vulnerable to communicable diseases and reports multiple barriers to immunization programs. The review also examines vaccination coverage among migrants in comparison with non-migrants, while noting that the gap had not previously been quantified. Research on vaccination capability further identifies public health, community and migrant health centers, and data systems such as electronic health records and vaccine databases as relevant areas for assessment.

From Guidance to Catch-Up Care

WHO guidance on COVID-19 immunization in refugees and migrants emphasizes global equity in vaccine distribution, national equity, equal respect, community engagement, and communication to build trust and counter misinformation. Related guidance recommends that public health agencies understand communities’ vaccine beliefs and practices and intentionally partner with them to reduce vaccination barriers. CDC domestic guidance advises clinicians at the first health visit to review available records, perform appropriate testing, and update or revaccinate when necessary. However, a March 2026 review reports that vaccination strategies for adolescent and adult arriving migrants remain poorly described despite life-course policies and global guidelines supporting catch-up vaccination.

Effective Strategies to Boost Vaccination Rates Among Migrants

A diverse group of migrants protected by a vaccine shield, symbolizing vaccine equity in the EU.

The systematic review identified three primary intervention studies conducted in the EU/EEA or high-income countries. These studies shed light on promising strategies for improving vaccination uptake among migrant populations. While the impact observed was generally small, the findings offer valuable insights for designing effective interventions.

Key interventions included:

  • Social Mobilization/Community Outreach: Engaging communities through outreach programs to raise awareness and promote vaccination.
  • Planned Vaccination Programs: Implementing structured vaccination programs tailored to the specific needs of migrant populations.
  • Education Campaigns: Providing accessible and culturally sensitive information about the importance of vaccination.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Mapping Equity-Focused Evidence

Recent research includes a scoping review of fairness-based techniques for optimizing vaccine allocation among migrants during pandemics. That review identifies a need for more research on national policies and delivery models that assess migrants and refugees case by case, while maintaining neutrality toward immigration status rather than using exclusion. Another scoping review examined vaccine access among asylum seekers, refugees, and undocumented migrants across the European Union, European Economic Area, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom, covering literature from 2000 through 2024. Community-engaged research has also described a three-phase program involving scholar recruitment and training, early community engagement, and community outreach vaccinations.

Limits of the Evidence

A systematic review of interventions intended to improve vaccination uptake and cost-effectiveness among newly arrived migrants in the EU and EEA identifies important evidence limitations. The review reports a lack of comparator data, making it difficult to assess interventions against appropriate alternatives. It also states that the only reported outcome was vaccine uptake, which limits conclusions about broader effects such as health outcomes or wider program performance.

These interventions demonstrated small but promising impact on vaccine uptake. It's important to note that the only outcome reported across these studies was vaccine uptake itself, with no data available on disease rates, enrollment in health services, or migrant acceptance of vaccination. Further research is needed to explore the broader impact of these interventions.

Moving Forward: Prioritizing Vaccination for Migrants in the EU/EEA

While data remains scarce, the review highlights the potential of social mobilization, vaccine programs, and education campaigns as promising strategies for improving vaccination rates among migrants. Further research is needed to explore the cost-effectiveness of these strategies and address the unique challenges faced by migrant populations. Vaccination of migrants must remain a public health priority in the EU/EEA, ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to protect themselves and their communities from vaccine-preventable diseases.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Trust, Delivery, and Inclusion

Reviews consistently frame vaccine hesitancy among migrant communities as a public health concern because refusing or delaying vaccination can undermine prevention and the eventual elimination of communicable diseases for which safe and effective vaccines are available. A 2024 narrative review describes vaccination reluctance as a worldwide concern and notes that migrant groups have been studied unevenly across countries. A 2022 review of refugee, immigrant, and migrant populations identifies three priorities: describing vaccination rates, identifying key barriers, and evaluating interventions that address hesitancy. A 2025 scoping review examines diverse vaccination delivery models targeting hesitancy and other access barriers.

Structural Barriers to Equity

The CDC describes refugee, immigrant, and migrant communities as often unequally affected by economic, social, and other obstacles to health and healthcare. Research involving more than 50 public health departments, healthcare systems, and community organizations identified systemic and structural barriers that continued to negatively affect vaccination rates among Black and African immigrant communities, even after sustained COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. The study also identified five key themes for vaccination programs that may have implications beyond COVID-19. These findings place vaccine inequity within broader systems of access rather than treating it solely as individual reluctance.

Building Inclusive Life-Course Protection

A life-course vaccination perspective argues that calls for equitable vaccine access during COVID-19 can serve as starting points for inclusive vaccination plans beyond the pandemic. The source specifically notes that both the World Health Organization and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control called for equity in access to COVID-19 vaccines. A related review describes vaccination reluctance among immigrants as a major public health concern because it can contribute to disease outbreaks and strain healthcare systems. Together, these sources connect individual access to vaccines with longer-term protection across migrant and refugee populations.

What a small intervention review can establish

Systematic review (level 2 of 8)

The population included newly arrived migrants and other migrant groups in the region; the review’s evidence base therefore spans more than one migrant group, while remaining limited to the studies it identified.[1]

What the findings add up to

The refugee-site comparison suggests that delivery context can coincide with substantially different uptake, but it does not isolate which element of the intervention produced the contrast.[2]

The reported pre-departure savings concern vaccination costs per person; they should not be read as a direct measure of health outcomes or of the EU/EEA setting.[2]

What keeps these results from being settled

  • The interventions did not address several reported access barriers, including language, travel distance, cost, and fear of arrest.[2]
  • Interventions used broad group-level approaches rather than tailoring the strategy to age groups or individual clinical encounters.[2]
  • The authors caution that findings from heterogeneous migrant groups may not transfer cleanly across populations with different ages and prior immunization or immunity.[1]

The 2018 review at a glance

Study designSystematic review[1]
PopulationNewly arrived migrants to the EU/EEA and other migrant groups in the region[1]
Sample sizeThree primary intervention studies and one cost effectiveness study[1]
SettingEU/EEA or high-income countries[1]
ComparisonPre-vaccination serotesting compared with presumptive vaccination[1]
Main outcomeVaccine uptake[1]
FundingRachael Morton is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Fellowship #1054216; Robin Christensen is supported by grants from the Oak Foundation; Sally Hargreaves is funded by the Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, the Wellcome Trust, and ESCMID research grant[1]
Conflicts of interestNo conflict of interest declared[1]
RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42016045798[1]
Times cited63[1]

Questions the evidence leaves open

  • Would interventions tailored to particular migrant groups or individual care encounters address barriers that broad group-level programs did not?[1] [2]
  • How would the observed uptake and cost comparisons change in European reception settings, given the distinction between those settings and the US refugee program?[2]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.3390/ijerph15102065, Alternate LINK

Title: Interventions To Improve Vaccination Uptake And Cost Effectiveness Of Vaccination Strategies In Newly Arrived Migrants In The Eu/Eea: A Systematic Review

Subject: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Publisher: MDPI AG

Authors: Charles Hui, Jessica Dunn, Rachael Morton, Lukas Staub, Anh Tran, Sally Hargreaves, Christina Greenaway, Beverly Biggs, Robin Christensen, Kevin Pottie

Published: 2018-09-20

Everything You Need To Know

1

What are vaccine-preventable diseases, and why is it important to focus on them in the context of newly arrived migrants?

Vaccine-preventable diseases, or VPDs, are illnesses that can be prevented through vaccination. They are significant because under-immunized migrant populations can lead to outbreaks of diseases like measles and polio, posing a threat to public health within the EU/EEA. Ensuring high vaccination rates among newly arrived migrants is crucial for preventing the spread of these diseases and protecting the broader community.

2

What is social mobilization/community outreach, and why is it important for improving vaccination rates among migrants?

Social mobilization and community outreach are strategies that involve engaging local communities to raise awareness about vaccination and promote its benefits. This is significant because it can address cultural or linguistic barriers that might prevent newly arrived migrants from accessing or understanding vaccination information. By building trust and providing culturally sensitive information, social mobilization can increase vaccine uptake within migrant communities.

3

What are planned vaccination programs, and how do they help in ensuring vaccination of migrant populations?

Planned vaccination programs are structured initiatives specifically designed to deliver vaccines to migrant populations. These programs are important because they can address the unique challenges faced by migrants, such as lack of documentation or unfamiliarity with the healthcare system. By offering targeted vaccination services, these programs can improve vaccination rates and ensure that newly arrived migrants are protected against vaccine-preventable diseases.

4

What are education campaigns, and what role do they play in increasing vaccination rates among migrants?

Education campaigns involve providing accessible and culturally sensitive information about the importance of vaccination. These campaigns are important because they can address misconceptions or concerns that migrants may have about vaccines. By delivering clear and accurate information, education campaigns can empower migrants to make informed decisions about their health and increase vaccine acceptance.

5

What did the systematic review focus on and what type of studies were included?

The systematic review looked at intervention studies conducted in the EU/EEA or high-income countries. The review focused on identifying interventions that increase vaccine uptake and assessing the cost-effectiveness of vaccination strategies in vulnerable populations. While the impact observed was generally small, the findings offer valuable insights for designing effective interventions.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.