Unpacking Race and Ethnicity: Why Clear Definitions Matter in Public Health
"Navigating the Complexities of Race and Ethnicity in Health Research to Achieve Equitable Outcomes"
It's a universal truth: health and disease don't affect everyone equally. These disparities are evident across various population groups, whether defined by race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, socioeconomic status, or gender. In the United States, racial and ethnic disparities are well-documented in physical and mental health conditions, health-related risk factors, and access to quality healthcare services.
The true challenge for public health lies in understanding the root causes of these disparities. By identifying the underlying factors, we can inform effective policies and develop targeted programs aimed at reducing health inequalities. But here's the catch: how we classify population groups significantly impacts how we examine and interpret these health disparities. Over the past few decades, the theories and methods used to study racial and ethnic disparities have faced substantial criticism within public health and epidemiology.
Several comprehensive reviews have pinpointed key issues in how race and ethnicity are used in public health research. These include: a failure to differentiate between the concepts of race and ethnicity, inconsistency and lack of transparency in assessment methods, and a dearth of thoughtful interpretation of study results. Reviews in related fields like biomedicine and nursing research have echoed these concerns, highlighting the urgent need for clarity and precision.
Race vs. Ethnicity: Untangling the Definitions

In recent anthropological and public health discourse, race and ethnicity are distinctly defined as concepts that address two separate facets of human diversity. Understanding the difference is the first step towards more accurate and meaningful research.
- The Limits of Biology: Current scientific knowledge and genetics challenge the notion that these racial groups are mutually exclusive based on biology.
- Genetic Variation: While clines and clusters exist in human genetic variation, they account for relatively little of the total variation. The three conventional racial groupings based on continental origins (Europe, Africa, and Asia) differ from each other by only 10% to 15% of their genes. Most human genetic variation is non-concordant, meaning that traits used to distinguish races have limited value in predicting other biological characteristics.
- Social Construct: Despite the dismissal of race as a purely biological concept, public health scholars propose using race as a social construct to understand social interactions and perceptions of race. The socio-cultural reality of race has biological consequences through social inequalities and embodied inequalities, perpetuating a racialized view of human biology.
Moving Forward: Towards More Equitable Health Research
To tackle the key problems in research related to race and ethnicity, we must first acknowledge that race and ethnicity are conceptually different. Doing so enables the appropriate selection of theories and methods to study each concept effectively, whether independently or in interaction. By recognizing the distinct nature of race and ethnicity, we can begin to address health disparities with greater precision and promote more equitable outcomes.