Secukinumab unlocking relief from ankylosing spondylitis in Canada

Unlocking Relief: Is Secukinumab the New Key to Ankylosing Spondylitis Treatment in Canada?

"A Deep Dive into the Cost-Effectiveness of Secukinumab for Managing Ankylosing Spondylitis from a Canadian Perspective."


Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), a type of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), primarily targets the spine, causing inflammation, pain, and reduced mobility. Beyond the spine, AS can affect peripheral joints and other areas, leading to significant discomfort and diminished quality of life. Understanding the available treatment options is crucial for managing this chronic condition.

Historically, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been the first line of defense against AS. However, for those who don’t respond adequately to NSAIDs, biologic therapies, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents and interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitors, offer alternative pathways to relief. This is where secukinumab comes into play as a promising option.

Secukinumab, the first fully human monoclonal antibody selectively neutralizing interleukin (IL)-17A, gained Health Canada's approval in April 2016 for treating adults with active AS who haven't responded well to conventional treatments. With its targeted approach and demonstrated efficacy, secukinumab presents a new angle in managing AS. This analysis explores the cost-effectiveness of secukinumab compared to other biologics within the Canadian healthcare framework.

Is Secukinumab the Most Cost-Effective Choice for Ankylosing Spondylitis in Canada?

Secukinumab unlocking relief from ankylosing spondylitis in Canada

Researchers utilized a decision-analytic model, a semi-Markov model, to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of secukinumab 150mg against other biologic treatments like certolizumab pegol, adalimumab, golimumab, etanercept, and infliximab. The model considered a biologic-naïve population over a 60-year time horizon, reflecting a lifetime perspective.

The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI 50) response rate, indicating a 50% improvement in BASDAI score, was used to assess treatment response after 12 weeks. The model accounted for various factors, including treatment response rates, drop-out rates, adverse events, and healthcare costs, to determine the overall value of each treatment.

  • Clinical Data: BASDAI 50 response rates, BASFI scores, and long-term changes from clinical trials and literature.
  • Cost Analysis: Drug acquisition costs, disease-related costs, medical support, and adverse event costs were included.
  • Quality of Life: Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used to measure benefits, incorporating utility weights to reflect health-related quality of life.
  • Mortality Risks: Age-related, disease-specific, and adverse event-related mortality were considered.
The results indicated that secukinumab 150mg dominated all comparators, providing the highest QALYs (16.46) at the lowest cost (CAD 533,010) over a lifetime. Sensitivity analyses further validated these findings, demonstrating that secukinumab maintains a higher probability of achieving maximum net monetary benefit across various cost thresholds. Even when different factors were adjusted, secukinumab held its ground as an economically sound option.

A Promising Path Forward

The analysis suggests that secukinumab is a cost-effective treatment choice for biologic-naïve AS patients in Canada, offering substantial benefits for patients and the healthcare system. As healthcare decisions increasingly weigh both clinical effectiveness and economic factors, secukinumab emerges as a valuable option for managing ankylosing spondylitis. Always consult with healthcare professionals to determine the most suitable treatment plan based on individual needs and circumstances.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1539400, Alternate LINK

Title: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Of Secukinumab In Ankylosing Spondylitis From The Canadian Perspective

Subject: Health Policy

Journal: Journal of Medical Economics

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Authors: Ron Goeree, Sima Chiva-Razavi, Praveen Gunda, Minal Jain, Steffen M. Jugl

Published: 2018-11-13

Everything You Need To Know

1

How does secukinumab specifically work to treat ankylosing spondylitis, and what makes it different from other biologic treatments?

Secukinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes interleukin (IL)-17A. It's approved in Canada for adults with active ankylosing spondylitis who haven't responded well to conventional treatments. By targeting IL-17A, secukinumab aims to reduce the inflammation and pain associated with the condition, offering a new approach for managing the disease. Secukinumab does not target TNF like other biologics, which can be beneficial for patients who do not respond to anti-TNF agents. However, it does not address other cytokines or pathways involved in ankylosing spondylitis, such as those targeted by JAK inhibitors.

2

What key data and factors were considered in the decision-analytic model used to assess the cost-effectiveness of secukinumab compared to other biologics?

The decision-analytic model, specifically a semi-Markov model, was used to compare secukinumab 150mg against other biologics like certolizumab pegol, adalimumab, golimumab, etanercept, and infliximab. The model incorporated clinical data like BASDAI 50 response rates, BASFI scores, and long-term changes observed in clinical trials. It also included a cost analysis considering drug acquisition costs, disease-related expenses, medical support, and adverse event costs. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used to measure the benefits, while mortality risks related to age, the disease itself, and adverse events were also taken into account. This comprehensive approach allowed researchers to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of each treatment over a 60-year time horizon but doesn't capture real-world patient experiences outside of clinical trials.

3

According to the cost-effectiveness analysis, what were the main findings regarding the benefits of using secukinumab for biologic-naïve ankylosing spondylitis patients in Canada?

The analysis indicated that secukinumab 150mg provided the highest QALYs (16.46) at the lowest cost (CAD 533,010) over a lifetime compared to other biologic treatments for biologic-naïve patients. Sensitivity analyses supported these findings, showing that secukinumab maintained a higher probability of achieving maximum net monetary benefit across different cost thresholds. Secukinumab dominated the treatments studied, however, this assumes that treatments are equally efficacious across all patients.

4

What does the term 'BASDAI 50' signify in the context of assessing the effectiveness of secukinumab and other treatments for ankylosing spondylitis?

BASDAI 50, which stands for Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, indicates a 50% improvement in a patient's BASDAI score. In the context of evaluating treatments like secukinumab, achieving a BASDAI 50 response after 12 weeks is a key indicator of treatment effectiveness. It reflects a clinically meaningful reduction in disease activity and symptoms, contributing to a better quality of life for individuals with ankylosing spondylitis. Other measures like ASAS scores and patient reported outcomes were not explicitly discussed.

5

If secukinumab is indeed a cost-effective treatment for ankylosing spondylitis, what are the broader implications for healthcare policy and patient access in Canada?

While the analysis suggests that secukinumab is a cost-effective option for biologic-naïve ankylosing spondylitis patients in Canada, its broader implications extend to healthcare policy and resource allocation. If secukinumab demonstrates similar effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in real-world settings, it could influence treatment guidelines and formulary decisions. This, in turn, may improve patient access to this innovative therapy and potentially reduce the overall economic burden of ankylosing spondylitis on the Canadian healthcare system. Secukinumab may improve patient outcomes while optimizing resource utilization. This doesn't automatically mean it's the best choice for every patient, and individual factors must be considered.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.