Surreal illustration of an open book revealing a cityscape, symbolizing the timeless wisdom of Aquinas.

Unlocking Aquinas: A Beginner's Guide to His Enduring Wisdom

"Is Thomas Aquinas relevant today? Explore a new brief history that makes his complex ideas accessible for modern readers."


Thomas Aquinas, a towering figure in philosophy and theology, often seems daunting to modern readers. His works, filled with intricate arguments and technical terms, can be intimidating for those unfamiliar with medieval thought. However, his ideas continue to resonate, offering valuable insights into ethics, metaphysics, and the nature of existence.

Brian Davies' "Thomas Aquinas: A Very Brief History" aims to bridge this gap. The book strives to make Aquinas accessible to newcomers, presenting his key concepts in a clear and concise manner. It seeks to provide a foundation for understanding Aquinas without requiring prior knowledge of medieval philosophy or academic theology.

This article delves into Davies' approach, examining how he tackles the challenges of presenting complex ideas in an accessible format. We'll explore his strategies for simplifying technical language and contextualizing Aquinas's thought for a contemporary audience. The goal is to determine how effectively this brief history unlocks Aquinas's wisdom for the modern reader.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

A Scholastic Influence

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy places Thomas Aquinas (ca. 1225–1274) between antiquity and modernity and calls him a leading figure in thirteenth-century philosophy and theology. Philopedia likewise dates him to 1225–1274 and describes his influence on medieval metaphysics, ethics, and natural law. These sources offer historical assessments of his impact, not numerical measures of present-day influence.

An Accessible Overview

The cited overview presents Aquinas’s philosophy in simple terms, using clear examples and accessible insights. It covers his life, metaphysics, ethics, natural law, faith and reason, and arguments about the existence of God. Its description does not identify a particular standard method or specify limitations, so it supports a description of the overview’s scope and style rather than an assessment of its method.

Faith, Reason, and Scholasticism

The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy gives Aquinas’s dates as 1224/6–1274 and describes him as a Dominican priest and Scriptural theologian. It says he took seriously the medieval principle that grace perfects and builds on nature rather than setting it aside. Britannica describes him as an Italian Dominican theologian, a foremost medieval Scholastic, and the systematizer of Latin theology; another source characterizes his life in thirteenth-century Italy as a bridge between Christian theology and Aristotle’s philosophy.

Breaking Down Barriers: How Davies Makes Aquinas Accessible

Surreal illustration of an open book revealing a cityscape, symbolizing the timeless wisdom of Aquinas.

One of the primary hurdles in understanding Aquinas is his use of technical language. Davies addresses this by carefully explaining key terms and concepts in plain English. For instance, when discussing Aquinas's arguments for the existence of God, Davies avoids jargon and focuses on the underlying logic. He uses everyday language to illustrate complex philosophical points.

Consider this passage regarding the challenge of proving God's existence and the role of testimony:

  • Davies quotes Aquinas: "It is often said that those who believe that God exists have no business doing so unless they can prove God's existence. Aquinas, however, does not accept this view. He does not think it always irrational to believe what one cannot prove since he is aware that learning often heavily depends on accepting things on someone's say-so."
  • Davies continues by adding: "He also recognizes that, as Aristotle emphasized, in order to avoid an infinite regress, we cannot argue at all unless we take some propositions to stand without demonstration."
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Recent Scholarship and the Aquinas Review

The Aquinas Review is described as a semiannual academic journal published by Thomas Aquinas College. Its subject range extends from theology and philosophy to the liberal arts broadly. The journal also states that essays reflect their authors’ positions, not necessarily the College’s, and that the editor and editorial board determine each issue’s contents.

Different Lines of Critique

The sources present distinct criticisms rather than one unified objection to Aquinas. A discussion of Bonaventure’s critique says that people are acquainted with the reality of God as the uninflected “to be,” even when they describe that reality mistakenly. A separate critique of Aquinas’s cosmological arguments contends that the causal chain does not violate the principle that something cannot come from nothing, because each event has a cause. Another article reports controversy around Jeffrey Johnson’s critique of alleged Aristotelian excesses in Aquinas’s natural theology.

Augustine and Aquinas on Faith and Reason

The comparison sources contrast Augustine’s emphasis on faith with Aquinas’s effort to reconcile faith and reason through systematic philosophy. One account identifies Augustine’s *Confessions* and Aquinas’s role as a major Scholastic thinker as markers of their different approaches. Another places Augustine in the early fifth century and says that he formed an inheritance Aquinas later transformed.

Davies' language is remarkably clear. Sentences are short and crisp, minimizing technical jargon. The complex issue of epistemic warrant is deftly translated into the idea of 'learning often heavily depends on accepting things on someone's say-so'. Even the potentially confusing concept of 'infinite regress' is clarified by relating it to the need for foundational assumptions in any argument. While the term might be new to some, Davies contextualizes it sufficiently for initial understanding.

A Valuable Starting Point for Exploring Aquinas

Davies' book successfully navigates the challenges of presenting Aquinas in a brief and accessible format. By simplifying technical language and providing historical context, he creates a valuable entry point for readers new to Aquinas's thought.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Interpreting Aquinas’s Moral and Political Thought

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy says Aquinas’s moral and political philosophy must be reconstructed from his theological treatises and commentaries, including those on Aristotle’s *Nicomachean Ethics* and the first two and a half books of the *Politics*. It notes that interpretation has been difficult since his death in 1274. A 2025 study described in its abstract evaluates his influence by examining his background, his relationship with Aristotelian thought, and his reflections on the Bible.

Wisdom for Ordinary Life

The article argues that Aquinas invites everyone to the “banquet of wisdom,” making no distinction between a master and the “man in the street.” It says ordinary people recognize that they live in a real world they did not create. According to the article, that recognition helps them appreciate natural law, which it presents as the basis of morality.

While some complex ideas are necessarily condensed, Davies maintains a high level of clarity throughout the book. His ability to express Aquinas's arguments in simple and clear language is a testament to his skill as a teacher and writer.

For those seeking an introduction to one of history's most influential thinkers, "Thomas Aquinas: A Very Brief History" provides a solid foundation for further exploration. It serves as an excellent starting point for anyone interested in delving into the rich and complex world of Aquinas's philosophy and theology.

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

Who was Thomas Aquinas and why might modern readers find his work challenging?

Thomas Aquinas was a significant figure in philosophy and theology. Modern readers often find his works challenging due to their intricate arguments, technical terminology, and the historical context of medieval thought which can be unfamiliar. Grasping Aquinas requires navigating his specific vocabulary and understanding the intellectual landscape in which he developed his ideas.

2

What is Brian Davies' "Thomas Aquinas: A Very Brief History" attempting to achieve?

Brian Davies' "Thomas Aquinas: A Very Brief History" aims to make Thomas Aquinas's complex ideas accessible to a modern audience, particularly those new to his work. The book seeks to provide a clear and concise introduction to his key concepts, without requiring prior knowledge of medieval philosophy or academic theology, thus acting as a bridge to understanding Aquinas's enduring wisdom.

3

How does Davies handle Thomas Aquinas's technical language to make it more understandable?

Davies addresses the challenge of Thomas Aquinas's technical language by carefully explaining key terms and concepts in plain language. He focuses on the underlying logic of Aquinas's arguments, avoiding unnecessary jargon, and illustrating complex philosophical points with everyday language. This approach makes Aquinas's ideas more accessible to readers without a background in philosophy or theology.

4

According to Thomas Aquinas, is it always necessary to prove something before believing it? How does Davies explain this?

Thomas Aquinas doesn't believe it's always irrational to believe something without proof, as learning often relies on accepting information from others. Davies clarifies this by emphasizing that Aquinas, like Aristotle, understood that arguments require foundational assumptions that are accepted without demonstration to avoid infinite regress. This highlights Aquinas's understanding of the limits of proof and the role of trust and foundational beliefs in knowledge.

5

What are the broader implications of simplifying philosophers like Thomas Aquinas for modern audiences, and what might be lost or gained in the process?

Simplifying philosophers like Thomas Aquinas makes their ideas accessible to a wider audience, potentially sparking interest in philosophy and theology and revealing the relevance of historical thought to contemporary issues. However, simplification risks oversimplifying complex arguments, potentially losing nuances and subtleties of Aquinas's original thought. It's crucial to strike a balance between accessibility and intellectual rigor to ensure that readers gain a genuine understanding of Aquinas's ideas, rather than a superficial overview. Also, the risk of decontextualization exists, where ideas are presented outside their original historical and intellectual setting, which can lead to misinterpretations or a failure to appreciate the full depth of Aquinas's contributions.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.