Colorimetric sensor measuring a color swatch with spectral light patterns, symbolizing improved accuracy.

Unlock True Colors: How to Improve the Accuracy of Your Colorimetric Sensors

"Discover the secrets to achieving professional-grade color accuracy with affordable sensors, perfect for small businesses and creative pros."


Accurate color measurement has traditionally relied on expensive spectrophotometers, often costing thousands of dollars. This put precise color analysis out of reach for many small businesses and independent creators. However, recent advancements in inexpensive colorimetric sensors, driven by developments in digital cameras and smartphones, have made affordable color measurement tools a reality.

These new 'color instruments,' priced well below $300, promise to democratize color accuracy. However, the lower price point often comes with a trade-off: reduced color accuracy. This raises a critical question: Can we improve the accuracy of these affordable sensors to a level that's useful for professional applications?

This article explores methods for enhancing the accuracy of colorimetric sensors, specifically focusing on two popular devices: the Node+ChromaPro and the Color Muse. By understanding the limitations of these sensors and applying innovative correction techniques, we can unlock their full potential and achieve surprisingly accurate color measurements.

The Challenge: Bridging the Gap Between Cost and Color Precision

Colorimetric sensor measuring a color swatch with spectral light patterns, symbolizing improved accuracy.

The core challenge lies in the fundamental difference between spectrophotometers and colorimetric sensors. Spectrophotometers measure reflectance across the entire visible spectrum, providing a detailed color 'fingerprint'. Colorimetric sensors, on the other hand, use a limited number of filters (typically red, green, and blue) to estimate color values. This simplification makes them affordable but inherently less accurate.

The study compares the color accuracy of the Node+ChromaPro and Color Muse against a high-end spectrophotometer (BYK-mac from BYK Gardner). The initial results reveal a noticeable difference in color accuracy, quantified using the dEcmc (1:1) metric. For the Node, an average dEcmc (1:1) value of 1.50 was observed, with a maximum deviation of 7.86. These values indicate a perceptible color difference compared to the spectrophotometer.

To improve color accuracy, the researchers developed three innovative methods:
  • Method A: Utilizes the combined Spectral Power Distribution (SPD) of the instrument's LEDs, optimizing three 'detector sensitivity' functions. This method involves complex calculations and fitting 63 parameter values.
  • Method B: Similar to Method A, but leverages the three fitted SPDs of the individual LEDs. This simplifies the process, requiring the fitting of 31 parameter values.
  • Method C: Correlates reflectance values from the spectrophotometer with CIELAB values measured by the Node+ChromaPro, using linear terms and cubic roots. This method is the simplest, involving only 13 parameter values.
The results demonstrate a significant improvement in color accuracy using these methods. For the Node+ChromaPro, Method B proved most effective, reducing the average dEcmc (1:1) value from 1.82 to 1.16. This improvement translates to a substantial increase in the percentage of samples with acceptable color matches (dEcmc (1:1) < 1.0), rising from 30.9% to 64%.

Unlock the Potential of Affordable Color Technology

By applying these correction methods, affordable colorimetric sensors can achieve a level of accuracy suitable for a wide range of applications. This opens up new possibilities for small businesses, designers, and anyone who needs reliable color measurement without breaking the bank. As technology advances, we can expect further improvements in the accuracy and accessibility of these valuable tools.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.3390/s18041252, Alternate LINK

Title: Improving Color Accuracy Of Colorimetric Sensors

Subject: Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Journal: Sensors

Publisher: MDPI AG

Authors: Eric Kirchner, Pim Koeckhoven, Keshav Sivakumar

Published: 2018-04-18

Everything You Need To Know

1

What are colorimetric sensors and how do they differ from spectrophotometers in measuring color?

Colorimetric sensors estimate color values using a limited number of filters, typically red, green, and blue. This approach makes them more affordable but inherently less accurate compared to spectrophotometers. Spectrophotometers, on the other hand, measure reflectance across the entire visible spectrum, providing a detailed color 'fingerprint' of the measured surface. This comprehensive spectral data allows for highly accurate color measurement but comes at a higher cost.

2

What innovative methods were used to improve the color accuracy of the Node+ChromaPro colorimetric sensor?

To enhance the color accuracy of the Node+ChromaPro, three innovative methods were developed. Method A optimized the instrument's LEDs by combining their Spectral Power Distribution (SPD), requiring the fitting of 63 parameter values. Method B simplified this process by leveraging the three fitted SPDs of the individual LEDs, reducing the fitting to 31 parameter values. Method C correlated reflectance values from a spectrophotometer with CIELAB values measured by the Node+ChromaPro using linear terms and cubic roots, involving only 13 parameter values.

3

Which method proved most effective in enhancing the color accuracy of the Node+ChromaPro, and what were the results?

Method B proved to be the most effective in improving the color accuracy of the Node+ChromaPro. This method reduced the average dEcmc (1:1) value from 1.82 to 1.16. This improvement significantly increased the percentage of samples with acceptable color matches (dEcmc (1:1) < 1.0) from 30.9% to 64%.

4

What is the dEcmc (1:1) metric, and why is it important in evaluating color accuracy?

The dEcmc (1:1) metric is a color difference formula used to quantify the perceived difference between two colors. A lower dEcmc (1:1) value indicates a smaller color difference and, therefore, higher color accuracy. In the context, it's used to compare the color measurements of the Node+ChromaPro and Color Muse against a high-end spectrophotometer. The goal is to minimize the dEcmc (1:1) value, demonstrating that the colorimetric sensors are producing measurements closer to those of the spectrophotometer.

5

Considering that 'color instruments' are more affordable, how can small businesses and creative professionals leverage these tools, and what are the implications for the industry?

Small businesses and creative professionals can leverage affordable color instruments like the Node+ChromaPro and Color Muse, enhanced with correction methods, to achieve reliable color measurements without incurring the high costs associated with spectrophotometers. This accessibility democratizes color accuracy, enabling better color management in various applications such as product development, design, and quality control. The industry implications include increased competition, innovation in color-critical fields, and the potential for more accurate and consistent color reproduction across different platforms and devices. The ability to enhance the accuracy of these tools through methods like Method A, Method B, and Method C further empowers users to tailor their color workflows to specific needs and budgets.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.