Intertwined plant roots and glowing fungal networks symbolizing plant-fungi partnership.

The Secret Social Network of Plants: How Fungi Shaped Land

"Unearthing the hidden partnerships that allowed plants to conquer Earth, and what it means for our future."


Imagine a world without plants. Impossible? Nearly. Plants form the very foundation of terrestrial ecosystems, providing the air we breathe and the food we eat. But life wasn't always green. The story of how plants transitioned from aquatic algae to colonizers of dry land is a tale of remarkable adaptation and, crucially, partnership.

For years, scientists believed that Glomeromycotina fungi were the unsung heroes of this plant takeover, forming symbiotic relationships that helped early plants absorb nutrients and water. However, recent discoveries have revealed a more complex picture, highlighting the significant role of another group of fungi: Mucoromycotina.

This article dives into the groundbreaking research exploring the evolutionary dynamics of these early mycorrhizal symbioses – the mutually beneficial relationships between plants and fungi – and how they paved the way for the incredible diversity of plant life we see today. Get ready to unearth the secrets of a hidden partnership that reshaped the planet.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Mycorrhizae in Plant Evolution

A 2018 analysis found that, across all four rooting scenarios it tested, the transition from no mycorrhizal association was best supported as involving Mucoromycotina; three scenarios had Bayes factors above 10, while the fourth had a Bayes factor of about 8.35. A global review describes three waves of mycorrhizal evolution: early arbuscular mycorrhizas, later diversification of non-mycorrhizal and other fungal associations, and a recent, ongoing wave linked to root complexity and rapid plant diversification in biodiversity hotspots. Separately, a 2026 study reports combining 440,788 vegetation plots with plant native-status and mycorrhizal-type data to investigate non-native plants across biomes.

How Mycorrhizal Research Has Advanced

Research on mycorrhizal symbiosis now draws on genomics and related approaches to investigate its biology and ecology. A recent review says that a framework for nutrient exchange and regulation between host plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has been established. It describes local and systemic regulation by plant nutrient status, along with autoregulation of mycorrhizae, as strategies that help stabilize the exchange relationship. The provided sources describe these advances and regulatory processes but do not specify particular methodological limitations.

The Fungal Pioneers: Unveiling the Role of Mucoromycotina

Intertwined plant roots and glowing fungal networks symbolizing plant-fungi partnership.

The prevailing theory long pointed to Glomeromycotina as the primary fungal partner that facilitated plant colonization of land. However, evidence has been mounting that Mucoromycotina fungi also formed mycorrhiza-like associations with several early-diverging lineages of land plants, such as liverworts and hornworts. But the question remained, which fungi played a more critical role in the initial stages of terrestrialization?

To investigate this, researchers compiled a vast database of plant species and their mycorrhizal associations, using molecular methods to identify the specific fungi involved. By analyzing the evolutionary relationships between these plants and fungi, and applying a Bayesian approach to model state transition dynamics, the scientists were able to reconstruct the most likely scenarios for the evolution of these symbiotic relationships.

The study revealed some fascinating insights:
  • Mucoromycotina as First Recruits: The recruitment of Mucoromycotina fungi was the most supported transition from a non-mycorrhizal state. This suggests that these fungi may have been the initial pioneers in partnering with early land plants.
  • Promiscuous Partnerships: Transitions between different combinations of Mucoromycotina and Glomeromycotina occurred frequently, indicating a period of experimentation and flexibility in these early symbiotic relationships.
  • A Complex Web of Associations: The study also found similar promiscuity among combinations that include either or both of Glomeromycotina and Ascomycota, with a nearly fixed association with Basidiomycota.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Mycorrhizas Across Plants and Time

The listed research describes arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as obligate biotrophs that form mutualistic associations with most land plants, including many important crops. Fossil evidence from the Rhynie Chert suggests a coevolutionary history of at least about 410 million years between land plants and fungi in the phylum Glomeromycota. A review of pteridophyte associations notes that early lycopsids and tree ferns dominated Carboniferous forests, approximately 358–299 million years ago.

Mutualism and Its Regulation

The evolutionary account presents the role of fungi in early land colonization as a hypothesis: for small plants with rhizoids but no roots or leaves, fungal partnerships may have helped address nutrient and water limitations where soils had not yet formed. A separate review describes plant nutrient status as regulating mycorrhizal associations locally and systemically, with autoregulation also helping stabilize the relationship. These sources frame the association as beneficial but regulated, rather than documenting a specific failure or counterexample.

Variation Among Hosts and Fungal Strategies

A study of five Eucalyptus species in Sichuan reported different mycorrhizal infection rates under natural conditions: Eucalyptus grandis had the highest reported rate at 68.3%, followed by E. globules at 64.6%, while E. exserta had the lowest at 29.6%. A separate survey in Guizhou, China, reported 38 medicinal, 39 edible, and 18 poisonous mycorrhiza species distributed across elevations from 190 to 2,230 metres. These findings compare different aspects of mycorrhizal variation—host infection rates in one study and reported fungal-use categories and elevation in the other.

These findings paint a compelling picture of early land plant evolution, with Mucoromycotina playing a far more prominent role than previously thought. It appears that these fungi were instrumental in helping plants adapt to the harsh terrestrial environment, providing essential nutrients and water in exchange for carbohydrates.

What This Means for Today

This research not only rewrites our understanding of plant evolution but also has implications for how we approach conservation and agriculture today. By understanding the specific roles that different fungi play in plant health and nutrient uptake, we can develop more sustainable agricultural practices that promote beneficial symbiotic relationships.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

A Long-Established Ecological Relationship

A 2024 chapter describes mycorrhizal symbiosis as having developed from a concept into a firmly established phenomenon within beneficial mutualistic symbioses. Its account places the relationship in the broader context of terrestrial ecosystems, where fungi and producer plants are interdependent. The supplied material also notes that plant nutrient status and mycorrhizal autoregulation help stabilize the exchange relationship.

For example, targeting efforts to promote Mucoromycotina in specific environments might be beneficial for certain crops or restoration projects, particularly in areas with poor soil quality. Further research is needed to fully understand the specific mechanisms of these symbioses and how they can be harnessed for practical applications.

The story of plant evolution is a story of partnership, and by appreciating the crucial role of fungi in this story, we can gain valuable insights into creating a healthier and more sustainable future for our planet.

How later studies place the early fungal partnership

A later paper says the ancestral-symbiosis hypothesis involving Mucoromycotina remains neither confirmed nor refuted, so the 2018 reconstruction is evidence for a scenario rather than proof of ancestry.[1]

A molecularly identified sample of land plant species

PopulationLand plant species with identified mycorrhizal fungi, plus non-mycorrhizal lineages[2]
Sample size732 land plant species plus 45 species representing non-mycorrhizal lineages[2]
Main outcomeEvolutionary transitions among repertoires of mycorrhizal associations[2]
Effect sizeBayes Factor was larger than 10 in three of four scenarios; ~8.35 in the fourth[2]
Conflicts of interestNo competing interests declared[2]
Times cited86[2]

What the evolutionary reconstruction suggests

The study’s transition model describes flexible combinations of fungal partners, but that flexibility did not persist uniformly: extant plants are more often associated strictly with Glomeromycotina after Mucoromycotina is lost.[3]

What keeps the early-partner account provisional

  • The evolutionary position of living Mucoromycotina symbionts remains unresolved, leaving their origin relative to land plants uncertain.[3]

What follow-up evidence would clarify the history

  • Would resolving the phylogenetic position of extant Mucoromycotina symbionts place their origin before, alongside, or after the emergence of land plants?[3]
  • Can a mycorrhizal partnership reappear after it has been lost, or does the low rate of reversal reflect a one-way evolutionary pattern?[3]
  • Would adding recently evolved non-mycorrhizal flowering-plant lineages change the inferred frequency of transitions away from symbiosis?[3]

Terms used to describe plant-fungus history

Phylogenetic conservatism
A pattern in which major plant groups associate relatively uniformly with major fungal groups.[3]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1038/s41598-018-28920-x, Alternate LINK

Title: Evolutionary Dynamics Of Mycorrhizal Symbiosis In Land Plant Diversification

Subject: Multidisciplinary

Journal: Scientific Reports

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Authors: Frida A. A. Feijen, Rutger A. Vos, Jorinde Nuytinck, Vincent S. F. T. Merckx

Published: 2018-07-16

Everything You Need To Know

1

What was the key to plants moving from water to land?

The transition of plants from aquatic environments to land required significant adaptations. The formation of symbiotic relationships, particularly with fungi, was crucial. These fungi, specifically Mucoromycotina and Glomeromycotina, helped early plants absorb nutrients and water from the soil, which was essential for their survival and growth on land. This partnership enabled plants to colonize previously uninhabitable environments, leading to the development of terrestrial ecosystems.

2

What are Mycorrhizal symbioses, and why were they important for early plants?

Mycorrhizal symbioses are mutually beneficial relationships between plants and fungi. In the context of early land colonization, these relationships were critical. The fungi, such as Mucoromycotina and Glomeromycotina, connected with the plant roots, providing essential nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen, and water. In return, the fungi received carbohydrates produced by the plants through photosynthesis. This exchange allowed both partners to thrive, fostering the growth and spread of plants across the land and fundamentally changing the planet.

3

Why is the role of Mucoromycotina so significant?

Mucoromycotina's role is significant because it's suggested that Mucoromycotina were the initial pioneers in partnering with early land plants. Research indicates that Mucoromycotina may have been instrumental in helping plants adapt to the harsh terrestrial environment by providing vital nutrients and water. This challenges earlier views that mainly focused on Glomeromycotina as the primary fungal partner, rewriting the understanding of early plant evolution and highlighting the previously underestimated importance of Mucoromycotina.

4

What does the "promiscuous partnerships" of fungi and plants mean?

The research findings suggest that transitions between different combinations of Mucoromycotina and Glomeromycotina occurred frequently. This indicates a period of experimentation and flexibility in these early symbiotic relationships. Plants did not exclusively rely on one type of fungi, and the ability to form partnerships with different fungi was crucial for adaptation and survival. This promiscuity highlights the dynamic and adaptable nature of the early plant-fungi interactions and helps explain the diversity of plant life we see today.

5

How does this research affect modern practices, like agriculture?

Understanding the roles of different fungi in plant health has implications for modern practices. The research highlights that by promoting beneficial symbiotic relationships, such as those between plants and Mucoromycotina or Glomeromycotina, agriculture can become more sustainable. This could lead to more efficient nutrient uptake, reduced need for fertilizers, and enhanced plant resilience, which in turn helps in creating healthier ecosystems.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.