What is contemporary theatre and how does it differ from traditional theatre?

Contemporary theatre is a form of dramatic performance that actively disrupts traditional norms and conventions. It challenges audience expectations by employing techniques like "ostranenie" to encourage critical engagement and a fresh understanding of theatrical works as art. Unlike traditional theatre, which often prioritizes passive reception, contemporary theatre seeks to make the audience active participants in the meaning-making process.

What is "ostranenie" and how is it used in contemporary theatre?

"Ostranenie" is a concept used in contemporary theatre to make the familiar seem strange, disrupting passive acceptance and prompting critical engagement. By estranging the audience from conventional expectations, "ostranenie" invites spectators to re-evaluate their understanding of the performance, encouraging a deeper, more critical interaction with the work.

What is the "V-effect" (Brechtian distanciation) and what is its purpose in theatre?

The "V-effect," or Brechtian distanciation, is a theatrical technique developed by Brecht to prevent the audience from passively identifying with the characters or narrative. It creates a sense of distance, making the audience critically aware of the performance as a constructed reality. This technique aims to encourage critical questioning and reflection rather than emotional immersion, aligning with Brecht's goal of using theatre to promote social and political awareness.

How does Aristotle's view on tragedy relate to Brecht's techniques of estrangement?

Aristotle's view on tragedy, which emphasizes representation, has significantly influenced classical theatre. However, Brecht critiqued what he saw as a distortion of Aristotelian tragedy, arguing that it led to passive acceptance by the audience. By challenging the Aristotelian notion of representation through techniques like the "V-effect," Brecht aimed to disrupt this passivity and encourage critical engagement, highlighting the political dimensions of theatre.

Surreal illustration of theatre audience displaced and floating.

The Inverted Unfamiliar: How Contemporary Theatre Challenges Our Expectations

Q: What role does the spectator play in contemporary theatre, and how has it changed?

Contemporary theatre invites spectators to actively explore and redefine their understanding of the art form. By challenging conventional expectations and embracing unconventional forms, it prompts a deeper engagement. "Ostranenie" becomes the spectator's new territory, a space for critical reflection and renewed appreciation, transforming the audience from passive viewers into active participants in the theatrical experience. This shift encourages a continuous re-evaluation of theatre's role and potential.

Theo Raines in Culture & Society December 2025 • 4 min read.

"Explore the evolution of modern theatre and how it disrupts traditional norms, inviting audiences to embrace new perspectives."

Contemporary theatre often faces accusations of straying from tradition. Critics and casual viewers alike question its deviations, yet examining its historical evolution reveals a fascinating shift. Over the 20th century, reciprocal influences among various art forms have allowed theatre to evolve, challenging its reliance on dramatic texts and reshaping its modes of representation.

This evolution introduces a unique dynamic: the disappointed expectations of spectators become an integral part of the dramatic experience. Audiences are no longer passive recipients but active participants, challenged to confront their own displacement and estrangement – a concept known as "ostranenie" – when facing theatrical representations conceived as works of art.

This article explores this "inverted unfamiliarity," examining how contemporary theatre uses estrangement to prompt critical engagement and redefine the relationship between performance and audience.

Brecht, Aristotle, and the Subversion of Expectations

Surreal illustration of theatre audience displaced and floating.

When discussing estrangement in theatre, the "V-effect," or Brechtian distanciation, immediately comes to mind. This concept stems from a critical reflection on the Aristotelian notion of representation – the very foundation upon which classical theatre is built. Brecht challenged what he saw as a diluted, or even distorted, version of Aristotelian tragedy.

Consider that Aristotle's view of tragedy emerged a century after the golden age of ancient tragedies. One could argue that his intellectual approach introduced a level of abstraction, creating a distance from the original object of study. This distance, in turn, led to a sense of "infidelity" to the true essence of tragedy. Because the classicists who followed Aristotle lacked direct experience of the original tragedies, they unknowingly amplified this initial distance. By interpreting Aristotle, they believed they were simply relaying his ideas, but in reality, they were further distorting them through their theoretical formulations.

Brecht's Critique: Brecht sought to dismantle the Aristotelian concept of representation, not just tragedy itself.
The Goal: To disrupt the passive acceptance of the spectator and encourage critical questioning.
Method: By creating a sense of distance, Brecht aimed to make recognition problematic, forcing the audience to actively engage with the performance.
Political Dimension: For Brecht, this aesthetic act had political implications, aiming to disalienate the spectator by providing a new, critical perspective on familiar subjects.

Florence Dupont echoes this sentiment, arguing that Aristotle prioritized text over all other theatrical elements. This emphasis, she contends, transformed theatre into a primarily literary art form, neglecting its inherent scenic and performative dimensions. Brecht's technique of alienation derives directly from the concept of ostranenie, coined by Shklovsky.

The Spectator's New Territory

Contemporary theatre, therefore, invites the spectator on a journey of re-evaluation. By challenging conventional expectations and embracing unconventional forms, it prompts a deeper engagement with the art form. The audience is no longer passively seated but actively exploring, constantly redefining their understanding of theatre. In this sense, ostranenie becomes the spectator's new territory, a space for critical reflection and renewed appreciation.