Catheter tangled in blood vessels

The Hidden Risks of Long-Term Catheter Use: What You Need to Know

"While permanent catheters offer convenience, a less-known complication—the 'stuck catheter'—can lead to serious health issues. Learn how to prevent and manage this hazardous twist."


In nephrology, ensuring a well-functioning vascular access is critical. Catheters have become more common with the rise in dialysis prevalence, offering a solution for those with conditions that prevent arteriovenous (AV) access. These conditions include peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, AV-access aneurysms, vascular steal phenomenon, and exhausted vascular access sites.

Tunneled catheters are often favored for their ease of use and convenience, but this preference comes with increased risks. Complications and the need for catheter removal are significant concerns. One such complication is the 'stuck catheter,' where the catheter adheres to the vessel wall, requiring invasive interventions for removal.

This article explores the 'stuck catheter' phenomenon and its consequences, drawing on a retrospective review of tunneled hemodialysis catheters. Understanding this complication can help improve patient care and outcomes.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Milestones in Dialysis Access

The history of dialysis began more than two centuries ago with experiments by Thomas Graham and eventually led to Willem Kolff's creation of the hemodialysis machine. The first human dialysis treatment took place in 1924 in Germany, when Dr. George Haas used two external cannulas, one connected to an artery and the other to a vein through surgical cutdown. Dialysis technology did not reliably save lives until the mid-1940s, while vascular-access development continued alongside advances in hemodialysis technology.

What is a 'Stuck Catheter' and Why is it a Problem?

Catheter tangled in blood vessels

A 'stuck catheter' occurs when a tunneled catheter resists removal due to adherence to the vessel wall. Normally, a catheter should slide out smoothly after the fibrous sheath is dissected from the surrounding cuff. However, in rare cases, the catheter becomes tethered, necessitating more aggressive interventions.

These interventions can include direct exploration, endoluminal procedures by interventional radiology (IR), or even open surgical measures like thoracotomy. Such procedures are associated with significant morbidity. While catheters are commonly known as 'permcaths,' it's essential to recognize the potential complications of catheter adhesion and retention.

  • Infection Risk: Stuck catheters can increase the risk of infections, potentially leading to severe complications.
  • Vascular Damage: Aggressive removal attempts can damage the vessel wall, causing further complications.
  • Increased Morbidity: Surgical interventions to remove stuck catheters are associated with higher morbidity rates.
  • Loss of Access: The affected vascular access site may become unusable for future catheter placements.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

What Recent Studies Examine

Recent research is examining very long-term central venous access devices used for home parenteral nutrition in adults. An international cross-sectional survey evaluated clinicians' experience managing tunneled or port catheters used for more than 10 years and peripherally inserted central catheters used for more than 2 years, including opinions about elective replacement. Other studies address removal of long-term pediatric ports, reporting a mean dwell time of 39.35 months, and training and practice surrounding tunneled hemodialysis catheter removal. One cited single-centre review of more than 2,000 removals reported complications in 0.92% of cases.

Limits of Current Removal Strategies

Long-term catheter use remains common for various reasons, including patient-related factors, and embedded catheters therefore require recognition and appropriate management. An endoluminal dilatation technique was reported as safe and effective without complications in a series of 15 patients cited by one case report. However, the exact mechanism of catheter adherence is still unclear because not every patient with prolonged catheter implantation develops the complication. Another source notes that several removal strategies have been published, but there is no consensus on the best approach.

Access Choices and Complications

A randomized pilot study compared metal needles with plastic cannulae for complications, including aneurysms and stenotic lesions, along cannulation sites in the arteriovenous access of hemodialysis patients. Separate reports examine stuck hemodialysis catheters, including a multicentre Italian survey of 72 cases. A case report describes central venous catheters as an effective short- to mid-term alternative while permanent access matures, but links prolonged use to thrombosis and fibrosis around the central vein. These sources compare different access approaches while highlighting that catheter-related complications can become more difficult to manage over time.

To understand the occurrence and consequences of this issue, a retrospective review was conducted. The goal was to describe the occurrence of this 'stuck catheter' phenomenon and its consequences.

How to Prevent and Manage Stuck Catheters

While retention of tunneled central venous catheters is rare, it is an important complication of prolonged catheter use. Nephrologists should be aware of this complication and its subsequent management. Endoluminal balloon dilatation procedures can be the initial approach to address the issue. In patients who fail less invasive endovascular procedures and are considered at high surgical risk, embedding the catheter after ligation and proximal division of the ports is an option with subsequent surveillance for and timely management of complications, such as sepsis.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Managing Stuck Catheters

A retrospective study examined treatment options for stuck tunneled cuffed catheters in 13 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. A separate report presents an Italian survey of 72 stuck hemodialysis catheters and describes how this complication was managed across multiple centres. Together, these sources show that stuck-catheter management has been addressed through clinical experience and reported case series. The available material focuses on treatment approaches rather than identifying a single universally established solution.

The Need for Specialized Expertise

Stuck hemodialysis catheters are described as an increasingly reported complication associated with tunneled catheter use. Management may require nephrologists to understand removal techniques involving interventional radiology and surgery. These procedures also carry risks, making the choice of approach clinically important. The broader challenge is ensuring that clinicians can recognize the problem and coordinate appropriate specialist management.

When Removal Becomes Complex

A case reported after kidney transplantation involved a 66-year-old woman who had undergone hemodialysis with a tunneled-cuffed catheter left in place for five years. The catheter became difficult to remove because of fibrotic adhesion, illustrating how a device used during one phase of care can create a problem during a later transition. Another case involved a 45-year-old man whose catheter had been placed in the left subclavian vein eight months earlier and became stuck in the central vein. These reports describe removal as complex when fibrosis or central venous location is involved.

What a single-center retrospective review can show

Observational study (level 4 of 8)

Because the study examined 19 retained catheters, it can characterize uncommon removal problems and their outcomes, but it provides limited evidence about how the findings apply to other populations or centers.[1]

Retention among removed catheters

  • July 2005 to December 2014The review covered removals performed from July 2005 through December 2014 at a single academic-based hemodialysis center.[1]

What the findings add up to

The study portrays retention as an uncommon event within catheter removal practice, but the cases that did occur could require substantial escalation and were not uniformly resolved by removal.[1]

The reported association with catheter vintage supports time as a possible contributor, while the retrospective design cannot separate catheter duration from other features of the patients, devices, or removal circumstances.[1]

What the single-center catheter-removal review actually examined

Study designObservational study[1]
Populationremoved tunneled hemodialysis catheters[1]
Sample size19 retained catheters[1]
Settingsingle academic-based hemodialysis center[1]
DurationJuly 2005 to December 2014[1]
Main outcomeincidence of stuck catheters[1]
Effect size0.92% retained; three could not be removed; one patient died from catheter-related infection[1]
Times cited22[1]

How this result fits related catheter evidence

A later survey reported that 30% of operators had encountered a stuck catheter during their careers, a measure of clinician experience rather than the incidence among removals.[2]

Related reports associate longer indwelling time with adherence and fracture risk, while also documenting that some stuck-catheter cases occur before two years, so duration alone does not fully identify risk.[3] [4]

The broader literature describes removal complications across tunneled, port, and peripherally inserted devices, and reports that elective replacement practices vary among centers.[5]

What follow-up evidence would need to clarify

  • Would a prospective, multicenter review find the same retention frequency across different dialysis programs and removal practices?[1]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.5301/jva.5000392, Alternate LINK

Title: The Stuck Catheter: A Hazardous Twist To The Meaning Of Permanent Catheters

Subject: Nephrology

Journal: The Journal of Vascular Access

Publisher: SAGE Publications

Authors: Venkat Sainaresh Vellanki, Diane Watson, Dheeraj K. Rajan, Cynthia B. Bhola, Charmaine E. Lok

Published: 2015-04-28

Everything You Need To Know

1

What exactly is a 'stuck catheter'?

A 'stuck catheter' is a serious complication that occurs when a tunneled catheter adheres to the vessel wall, preventing its easy removal. Unlike normal situations where the catheter can be smoothly removed after the fibrous sheath is dissected, a 'stuck catheter' requires more invasive interventions, such as direct exploration, endoluminal procedures, or even open surgical measures like thoracotomy.

2

Why is a 'stuck catheter' a problem?

The significance of a 'stuck catheter' lies in the complications it can cause. The aggressive interventions required for its removal are associated with significant morbidity. These complications include increased infection risk, vascular damage, higher morbidity rates, and potential loss of vascular access. The risk of a 'stuck catheter' is a crucial consideration when evaluating the long-term use of tunneled catheters, particularly in nephrology settings where vascular access is critical for dialysis.

3

Why are tunneled catheters used?

Long-term catheter use, especially involving tunneled catheters, is more common with the rise in dialysis prevalence. These are often favored for their ease of use in patients with conditions that prevent arteriovenous (AV) access, such as peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, AV-access aneurysms, vascular steal phenomenon, and exhausted vascular access sites. However, the convenience comes with increased risks, with 'stuck catheter' being a notable and dangerous complication.

4

What can be done to prevent or manage 'stuck catheters'?

Preventing and managing 'stuck catheters' involves several strategies. Nephrologists should be aware of this complication. Initial approaches often include endoluminal balloon dilatation procedures. For patients who fail less invasive procedures and are at high surgical risk, embedding the catheter after ligation and proximal division of the ports is an option. Continuous surveillance and timely management of potential complications, especially sepsis, are also essential in managing 'stuck catheters'.

5

What are the implications of a 'stuck catheter'?

The implications of a 'stuck catheter' are considerable, impacting patient care and outcomes. The need for invasive procedures to remove the catheter contributes to increased morbidity, including infection risk, vascular damage, and potential loss of vascular access. This can lead to prolonged hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and potentially life-threatening complications. Understanding and addressing the 'stuck catheter' phenomenon is crucial for improving patient safety and optimizing the management of tunneled catheters, especially in the context of dialysis.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.