Surreal illustration of a dialysis patient with floating thought bubbles representing coping strategies.

Dialysis Dilemmas: Can Your Coping Strategy Impact Your Health?

"New research explores how your approach to stress can affect treatment adherence and well-being during hemodialysis."


For individuals undergoing hemodialysis, managing their condition involves far more than just medical treatments. Non-adherence to treatment plans and the presence of other illnesses (comorbidities) are common challenges, significantly affecting both health outcomes and financial stability. With the non-adherence rate potentially reaching as high as 80%, there's a pressing need to understand the factors influencing patient behavior and overall well-being.

A recent study published in the Journal of Korean Medical Science sheds light on the critical role coping strategies play in the lives of hemodialysis patients. Coping strategies are the methods people use to manage and overcome stressful situations. This research delves into how these strategies impact treatment adherence, the severity of comorbidities, and overall psychological health.

By understanding the relationship between coping strategies and health outcomes, healthcare professionals can better support patients in adopting healthier behaviors and improving their quality of life. This article breaks down the study's findings, offering practical insights for patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers alike.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Coping and Hemodialysis Stress

Hemodialysis patients face disease- and treatment-related stresses and use varied coping strategies to manage them. Research has examined whether these strategies are associated with mortality and health-related outcomes. A 2023 study also assessed relationships among depression, anxiety, stress, and coping strategies in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Another study reported that emotion-focused coping scores increased by 0.217 points for each additional year on dialysis, linking longer treatment duration with greater reliance on emotion-based coping.

From Experiments to Lifesaving Treatment

The history of dialysis began with experiments by Thomas Graham more than two centuries ago and culminated in Willem Kolff's creation of the hemodialysis machine. The first human dialysis treatment took place in Germany in 1924, although the technology did not reliably save lives until the mid-1940s. Georg Haas published the first scientific article on hemodialysis in 1925 and described its successful use in a patient with acute kidney failure. Renal replacement therapy for end-stage kidney disease reached major, initially unforeseen goals over the six decades beginning in 1960.

Decoding Coping Strategies: What Works Best for Hemodialysis Patients?

Surreal illustration of a dialysis patient with floating thought bubbles representing coping strategies.

The study, involving 49 hemodialysis patients, categorized participants into three main groups based on their dominant coping strategy:

The study assessed coping strategies using a Korean version of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire (K-WCQ), which evaluates different approaches to dealing with stress. Researchers also collected data on comorbidities using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and measured treatment adherence with the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8).

  • Problem-Focused (PRO): This group actively tackles problems and seeks solutions.
  • Support-Seeking (SUP): This group relies on seeking emotional and practical support from others.
  • Hopeful-Thinking (HOP): This group tends to focus on positive thinking and wishful outcomes.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Coping and Treatment Adherence

A systematic review examined associations between coping strategies and medication adherence across several chronic conditions. In the review's summary of hemodialysis research, Hwang et al. (2018) linked emotion-focused coping with negative outcomes, while problem-solving or active coping and support-seeking were linked with positive outcomes. Other cited research stated that emotional or avoidant strategies are associated with lower treatment adherence, whereas rational coping may predict higher adherence in some chronic illnesses. A study of Japanese hemodialysis patients used data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study IV, conducted between 2009 and 2012.

Limits of the Evidence

Research has suggested that high levels of hope may help patients manage psychological symptoms, but evidence about hope's influence on physical health outcomes remains limited. One study reported that its sample became too small when participants were divided into three groups, so larger studies are needed to establish whether the findings generalize. A 2021 literature review sought to identify which coping strategies have the greatest impact on quality of life among people with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis. Qualitative research published in 2025 examined health challenges and coping strategies among young patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis.

Psychosocial Coping Patterns

A 2026 study examined psychosocial health issues, psychosocial distress, and coping mechanisms among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Its stated purpose was to provide a basis for developing an evidence-informed psychosocial support guideline for hemodialysis units. The study therefore frames coping as part of a broader psychosocial assessment rather than as an isolated behavior. The available source material does not provide comparative outcome figures or identify one coping mechanism as superior.

The research revealed some key differences between these groups:

Practical Steps for Patients and Caregivers

The study underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing the coping strategies used by hemodialysis patients. Encouraging problem-focused coping, where patients actively seek solutions and take control of their health, can lead to better treatment adherence and improved management of comorbid conditions. Healthcare providers should assess patients' coping mechanisms and tailor interventions to promote healthier coping styles, ultimately enhancing their overall well-being and quality of life.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Challenges Across Eight Coping Types

Maintenance hemodialysis creates physical, psychological, and social challenges that can affect well-being and quality of life. Qualitative research has specifically examined the experiences and coping mechanisms of young people aged 18 to 45 years undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Another source divides coping strategies among patients undergoing hemodialysis into eight types: confronting, emotive, fatalistic, self-reliant, palliative, evasive, optimistic, and supportive coping. The stated objective of that research was to assess these strategies and their related factors.

Depression and Coping in Dialysis

A narrative review addresses the prevalence, causes, assessment, and management of depression among dialysis patients, with emphasis on both adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies. It also considers psychological and pharmacological interventions. Separately, a randomized controlled clinical trial examined the impact of stress-management training on stress-related coping strategies and self-efficacy in hemodialysis patients. Together, these sources present coping as both a psychological concern and a potential target for structured support.

What a cross-sectional comparison can show

Observational study (level 4 of 8)

The comparison involved 49 hemodialysis patients, so dividing participants among coping groups leaves a limited basis for judging how broadly the pattern applies.[1] [2]

What keeps this result from being settled

  • Because the study was cross-sectional, it cannot determine whether coping preceded the health outcomes or followed them.[1] [2]
  • The authors said future work should define hope systematically, since differing definitions can make findings harder to compare.[1]

Study details: coping groups in a Korean hospital

Study designObservational study[2]
Sample size49[2]
SettingChung-Ang University Hospital[2]
DurationMean duration of hemodialysis was 73.3 ± 9.8 months[2]
Effect sizeMean MMAS-8 score: PRO 7.2 ± 0.5 vs HOP 5.2 ± 2.0; mean age-adjusted CCI score: PRO 5.0 ± 1.8 vs HOP 7.2 ± 2.1[2]
p-valueP = 0.024 and P = 0.017[2]
Times cited10[2]

What a follow-up study would need to clarify

  • Would coping patterns measured before outcomes predict later adherence or comorbidity changes, rather than merely occurring alongside them?[1] [2]
  • How would a consistent definition of hopeful-thinking affect comparisons of its relationship with physical and psychological outcomes?[1]

Short answers about the study

Did the coping groups differ in biochemical measures of non-adherence?

No significant group differences were found using the study’s biochemical indicators.[1]

How common were comorbid conditions in the study population?

At least one comorbid condition was present in 87.8% of participants.[1]

Which comorbidities were most commonly reported among the Korean participants?

Diabetes with end-organ damage, chronic pulmonary disease, and ulcer were the most commonly reported conditions.[1]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e148, Alternate LINK

Title: Influence Of Major Coping Strategies On Treatment Non-Adherence And Severity Of Comorbid Conditions In Hemodialysis Patients

Subject: General Medicine

Journal: Journal of Korean Medical Science

Publisher: Korean Academy of Medical Sciences

Authors: Hyun Chan Hwang, Hye Ri Kim, Doug Hyun Han, Ji Sun Hong, So-Hee Jeong, Jung-Ho Shin, Su-Hyun Kim, Jin Ho Hwang, Sun Mi Kim

Published: 2018-01-01

Everything You Need To Know

1

What are coping strategies, and what role do they play in managing a condition?

Coping strategies are the methods individuals use to manage and overcome stressful situations. The study identified three main coping strategies among hemodialysis patients: Problem-Focused (PRO), Support-Seeking (SUP), and Hopeful-Thinking (HOP). The choice of strategy can significantly influence treatment adherence, the severity of comorbidities, and overall psychological health. Understanding these strategies is crucial for healthcare professionals to support patients effectively.

2

How do coping strategies affect treatment and overall health?

The research found that different coping strategies have varying impacts. Problem-Focused (PRO) coping, which involves actively tackling problems, can lead to better treatment adherence and improved management of comorbid conditions. This is significant because higher treatment adherence is directly associated with better health outcomes and quality of life for individuals undergoing hemodialysis.

3

Why is adherence to treatment so important for individuals undergoing hemodialysis?

Non-adherence to treatment plans is a major challenge for individuals undergoing hemodialysis, with rates potentially reaching as high as 80%. This non-adherence significantly affects health outcomes and financial stability. Comorbidities, or the presence of other illnesses, further complicate the situation, impacting both the physical and psychological well-being of patients. Addressing non-adherence and managing comorbidities are essential steps in improving the overall health outcomes for hemodialysis patients.

4

How can healthcare professionals use this information to improve patient care?

Healthcare professionals can assess patients' coping mechanisms using tools like the Korean version of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire (K-WCQ). They can then tailor interventions to promote healthier coping styles, such as encouraging Problem-Focused (PRO) coping. By understanding and addressing these strategies, providers can enhance patients' overall well-being and improve their quality of life.

5

What are the practical implications of these findings for patients and caregivers?

The findings underscore the importance of recognizing and addressing the coping strategies used by hemodialysis patients. Encouraging Problem-Focused (PRO) coping, where patients actively seek solutions and take control of their health, can lead to better treatment adherence and improved management of comorbid conditions. Healthcare providers, caregivers, and patients themselves can all play a role in adopting strategies that promote healthier behaviors, ultimately improving overall well-being.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.