Balanced scale representing the Educational Performance Measure and Situational Judgement Test in the UK Foundation Programme.

The EPM Edge: Leveling the Playing Field for Future Doctors in the UK

Avery Sinclair monogram
Avery Sinclair in Mind & Education October 2026 • 4 min read.

"Is the Educational Performance Measure truly a fair way to rank medical students?"


Securing a spot in the UK Foundation Programme is a crucial step for aspiring doctors. While the Situational Judgement Test (SJT) has been a focal point of discussion regarding fairness, it's equally important to examine the Educational Performance Measure (EPM). This measure carries a comparable weight to the SJT in the ranking process, making it essential to understand its role in determining the allocation of training positions for newly qualified doctors.

The EPM aims to acknowledge students who have demonstrated consistent academic achievement throughout their university careers. A significant portion of the EPM is based on a student's ranking within their university, promoting an environment where diligent effort is rewarded. This contrasts with concerns raised about the SJT, where students have expressed unease regarding score weighting, ranking formats, and potential subjectivity.

While debates around the SJT continue, the EPM serves as a complementary tool designed to assess students based on their overall academic performance. This article dives into how the EPM functions, its strengths, and how it addresses some of the limitations associated with standardized testing.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Names and Fantasy Associations

The supplied discussions show people choosing names for their sound, meaning, and emotional associations rather than for any measured educational or medical outcome. A September 11, 2024 Nameberry thread lists Bren with associations including “sword,” “raven,” and “black-haired,” alongside Opa, associated with “owl,” and Esmeray, described as “dark moon.” Another Nameberry discussion records a parent seeking magical and fantastical girls’ names during pregnancy, while a separate thread mentions Greek, Celtic, and ancient names chosen for interesting meanings and pronounceable fantasy sounds.

Limited Evidence Base

The supplied material does not provide evidence about standard approaches, accepted methods, or limitations in UK medical education. It therefore cannot support a specific account of established practice or comparative effectiveness. Any broader claims about methods would require relevant educational research or policy sources.

Forum-Based Technical History

The supplied historical material concerns Porsche 911 maintenance rather than medical education. A Pelican Parts discussion reports that Zimmermann rotors are considered suitable for road use with original brake pads, while heat problems may arise with racing pads and may be reduced through brake cooling. The wider Pelican Parts forum and its Porsche 911 Technical Forum are presented as communities for discussion, questions, and technical exchange, not as records of foundational discoveries in education or medicine.

Academic Ranking: Rewarding Consistent Performance

Balanced scale representing the Educational Performance Measure and Situational Judgement Test in the UK Foundation Programme.

The UK Foundation Programme uses academic performance as a key indicator of a student's potential. Unlike a one-time exam, the EPM considers a student's intra-university ranking, aiming to foster healthy competition and reward consistent hard work. This approach seeks to identify students who have shown dedication and commitment throughout their academic journey.

Critics of standardized tests often point to the potential for a single “off-day” to negatively impact a student's score. The EPM, by considering a broader range of academic achievements, aims to mitigate this risk. It acknowledges that a student's overall performance is a more reliable indicator of their capabilities than a single test score.

  • Intra-University Ranking: Focuses on a student's performance relative to their peers within the same institution.
  • Consistent Performance: Aims to reward students who have consistently excelled throughout their academic careers.
  • Healthy Competition: Encourages students to strive for excellence in their studies.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

FFXIV Party-Finder Tools

The supplied material describes recent Final Fantasy XIV Party Finder tools rather than research or reviews of medical education. Better XIV Party Finder is described as offering real-time updates and advanced filtering, while xivpf lists activities such as AAC Cruiserweight M4 (Savage) learning parties. The Final Fantasy XIV Online Wiki describes Party Finder as a system for forming groups for social activities and challenges, and a 2023 Reddit post describes a browser-based, region-wide service with Discord integration and scheduled start times.

Windows Troubleshooting

The supplied sources frame failure and recovery through Windows audio troubleshooting rather than through evidence about EPM or medical training. Microsoft recommends running the automated audio troubleshooter in the Get Help app on Windows 11, while older versions and mobile devices should use general troubleshooting steps. Microsoft also describes Get Help as a central hub containing tutorials, FAQs, community forums, and direct support, with Windows Search offering another route to assistance.

Separated Debate Spaces

The supplied sources do not provide a substantive comparison of educational pathways or medical-selection systems. Instead, three Denver Broncos forum pages repeat a policy that keeps the Broncos Country message boards separate from politics because political discussion can become highly emotional and passionate. The material therefore supports only the narrower observation that this forum distinguishes sports discussion from political debate, not a comparison relevant to future doctors in the UK.

However, the EPM is not without its critics. Concerns have been raised about potential disparities between universities. While the EPM rewards students who rank highly within their specific university, it may not fully capture the achievements of top-performing students nationwide. A 2008 study analyzing the performance of 5,287 doctors in Royal College of Physicians postgraduate examinations revealed significant differences in results across university cohorts. For instance, 76% and 67% of graduates from Cambridge and Newcastle universities, respectively, passed their written examination on the first attempt, compared to 32% for Liverpool, 38% for Dundee, and 37% for Belfast. This highlights the need for a standardized evaluation system across all medical schools in the UK, similar to the standardized medical licensing examinations in the United States.

A Balanced Approach to Evaluating Future Doctors

Both the SJT and EPM have their strengths and weaknesses. The EPM acknowledges a broader range of academic achievements, potentially mitigating the impact of a single “off-day” on a student's overall ranking. However, concerns about inter-university disparities remain. The UK Foundation Programme is continuously evolving, and further research and refinement of both the SJT and EPM are essential to ensure a fair and comprehensive evaluation process.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Evaluating Product Claims

The supplied sources concern reviews of the NeoSocket Fuel Saver, also referred to in one source as Fuel Shark, rather than expert commentary on medical education. The product is marketed as a small plug-and-play device that supposedly reads vehicle data and improves fuel efficiency over time. The sources emphasize comparing those promises with real reviews, teardown tests, and actual test results, with some descriptions characterising the product as a scam.

A-Level Decision Points

The supplied material addresses future academic choices through the question of whether a student can drop an A-level in Year 12. A March 26, 2024 article describes the decision as potentially significant because it may affect workload, future academic goals, and career plans. The other supplied sources discuss college party shoes and graphic-design courses in Nigeria, including schools and programme types, but do not establish specific future trends in UK medical education.

Community Context

The supplied sources are duck-hunting forum posts rather than evidence about systemic challenges in UK medical education. One 2007 post describes a Southwest Michigan Delta show and banquet, mentioning firearms, a bring-your-own-beverage arrangement, and a preference for cans because they were collected for pothole adoption. Other posts concern the sale of Delta Waterfowl and McAlister hats and holiday greetings among forum members, offering community context but no basis for claims about education, access, or inequality.

Lived Experience

The supplied material does not include sources about the human experience or real-world impact of EPM in medical education. A responsible treatment would need evidence on students’ experiences, decision-making, wellbeing, opportunities, and outcomes. Without such sources, no specific impact claim can be supported.

How EPM compares with other selection measures

A national comparison found that EPM scores distinguished among candidates in the average-to-high performance range, while situational judgement tests tended to provide more information at the lower end. This describes different score patterns, not which measure is fairer.[1]

The EPM fairness question in foundation-job allocation

SettingUK Foundation Programme[2]
Main outcomeFairness of the EPM in determining allocation of foundation-training jobs[2]
Times cited1[2]

What complicates a fairness judgment

  • The paper argues that points for extracurricular performance may reduce some bias, but does not establish that they remove it.[3]
  • A critique notes that intercalation opportunities vary by school, potentially affecting the additional points students can earn.[2]
  • Access to research may depend on academic connections, while an additional degree can also create research opportunities and bring further credit.[2]

What remains unresolved about EPM fairness

  • How much do differences in assessment baskets change the comparability of students’ rankings across medical schools?[4]
  • To what extent do unequal chances to intercalate or access research affect EPM scores, beyond differences in academic performance?[2]

Terms used in EPM comparisons

Educational Performance Measure
A composite measure of medical-school academic performance that excludes final-year assessment performance.[4]

Sources

  1. Evaluating the validity of the selection measures used for the UK’s foundation medical training programme: a national cohort study (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  2. Parallel to the Situational Judgement Test: is the Educational Performance Measure fair in ranking medical students on the UK Foundation Programme? (Informa UK Limited, 2016)
  3. Parallel to the Situational Judgement Test: is the Educational Performance Measure fair in ranking medical students on the UK Foundation Programme? (Europe PMC, 2016)
  4. Could the UK Foundation Programme training post allocation process result in regional variations in the knowledge and skills of Foundation doctors? A cross‐sectional study (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.2147/amep.s121242, Alternate LINK

Title: Parallel To The Situational Judgement Test: Is The Educational Performance Measure Fair In Ranking Medical Students On The Uk Foundation Programme?

Subject: Education

Journal: Advances in Medical Education and Practice

Publisher: Informa UK Limited

Authors: Harmeet Singh Sidhu, Adil Mahmood, Ranjodh Sanghera, Jay Mandan

Published: 2016-10-01

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is the Educational Performance Measure (EPM), and how does it relate to the Situational Judgement Test (SJT) in the UK Foundation Programme application process?

The Educational Performance Measure (EPM) is a tool used in the UK Foundation Programme to evaluate and rank medical students. It carries a weight comparable to the Situational Judgement Test (SJT) in determining training position allocations. While the SJT has faced scrutiny regarding fairness, the EPM complements it by acknowledging consistent academic achievements throughout a student's university career. The EPM aims to offer a balanced approach by considering a student's intra-university ranking, rewarding diligent effort, and mitigating some limitations associated with standardized testing like the SJT.

2

How does the Educational Performance Measure (EPM) assess medical students, and what specific aspects of their academic record are considered?

The Educational Performance Measure (EPM) assesses medical students primarily based on their academic performance during their university studies. A significant portion of the EPM relies on a student's intra-university ranking, which focuses on their performance relative to their peers within the same institution. This approach aims to reward consistent performance and dedication throughout their academic journey, identifying students who have shown commitment over time. Unlike a one-time exam, the EPM considers a broader range of academic achievements, striving to provide a more reliable indicator of a student's capabilities.

3

What are the criticisms of the Educational Performance Measure (EPM), particularly concerning disparities between different universities in the UK?

One of the main criticisms of the Educational Performance Measure (EPM) revolves around potential disparities between universities. While the EPM rewards students who rank highly within their specific university, it may not fully capture the achievements of top-performing students nationwide. A 2008 study revealed significant differences in postgraduate examination results across university cohorts, highlighting the need for a standardized evaluation system across all medical schools in the UK. The concern is that a student from a less competitive university might be ranked higher within their institution but perform less well compared to a student from a more competitive university.

4

How does the Educational Performance Measure (EPM) aim to address the potential shortcomings of relying solely on standardized tests like the Situational Judgement Test (SJT) for evaluating future doctors?

The Educational Performance Measure (EPM) aims to mitigate the potential for a single "off-day" to negatively impact a student's score, which can be a concern with standardized tests like the Situational Judgement Test (SJT). By considering a broader range of academic achievements, the EPM acknowledges that a student's overall performance is a more reliable indicator of their capabilities. This approach seeks to reward consistent hard work and dedication throughout a student's academic career, providing a more balanced assessment than relying solely on a one-time examination.

5

Given the strengths and weaknesses of both the Situational Judgement Test (SJT) and the Educational Performance Measure (EPM), what improvements or further research could enhance the fairness and comprehensiveness of the UK Foundation Programme's evaluation process?

To enhance the fairness and comprehensiveness of the UK Foundation Programme's evaluation process, further research and refinement of both the Situational Judgement Test (SJT) and the Educational Performance Measure (EPM) are essential. Addressing concerns about inter-university disparities within the EPM could involve standardizing evaluation criteria or incorporating a normalizing factor to account for differences in academic rigor across institutions. For the SJT, ongoing analysis of score weighting and ranking formats is necessary to ensure objectivity and minimize potential biases. Exploring alternative assessment methods that complement both the SJT and EPM, such as portfolio-based evaluations or structured interviews, could also provide a more holistic view of a candidate's suitability for the Foundation Programme. Continuous monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of these measures are crucial to ensure a fair and comprehensive evaluation process.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.