Surreal landscape depicting the mystery of the Elasmosaurus platyurus with scattered fossils and an outline where the fossil once lay.

The Case of the Missing Elasmosaurus: What Happened to This Fossil?

"Unraveling the mystery of the Elasmosaurus platyurus: A deep dive into the lost parts of a historic fossil and what its disappearance means for paleontology."


In the vast, open landscapes of western Kansas in 1867, a remarkable discovery was made that would soon capture the attention of the scientific community. Army Surgeon Dr. Theophilus Turner and his team unearthed the remains of a giant plesiosaur, a creature that once swam in ancient seas. The find was not only a significant scientific event but also a logistical challenge, requiring the careful excavation and transport of the massive skeleton more than a hundred miles to the nearest town and then halfway across the country by rail to the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.

Quickly examined and named Elasmosaurus platyurus by Edward D. Cope in 1868, it quickly became an important scientific discovery that quickly became controversial. While Cope's expertise was undisputed, his initial reconstruction of Elasmosaurus was met with skepticism. Despite the controversy, the discovery stirred excitement and advanced the field of paleontology, but there was one thing people were questioning, where did the parts of the fossil go?

Today, over one hundred and fifty years after its discovery, many stories regarding E.D. Cope's ‘head on the wrong end' reconstruction continue to be repeated in popular media. However, there's an important and consistently overlooked issue, the fate of the missing portions of the original Elasmosaurus skeleton.

Elasmosaurus platyurus: Uncovering the Mystery of Missing Fossils

Surreal landscape depicting the mystery of the Elasmosaurus platyurus with scattered fossils and an outline where the fossil once lay.

As originally described by Cope (1868), the type specimen of Elasmosaurus platyurus from western Kansas included more than 100 vertebrae, portions of the skull, and the reasonably complete pectoral and pelvic girdles of what was then the largest known plesiosaur. The pectoral and pelvic girdles, essential for understanding the anatomy and movement of this ancient marine reptile, were meticulously documented and illustrated by Cope, highlighting their significance in his initial descriptions.

Within four years of its discovery, however, both of the limb girdles had disappeared with no official explanation. What makes this disappearance so puzzling is the lack of any official record or explanation from the Academy of Natural Sciences. The loss of such significant parts from a type specimen raises questions about the preservation and handling of these invaluable scientific resources.

  • Initial Discovery and Description: The Elasmosaurus platyurus was found in western Kansas in 1867 and described by Edward D. Cope in 1868.
  • Missing Girdles: The pectoral and pelvic girdles, initially present, disappeared within four years without explanation.
  • Cope's Initial Reconstruction: Cope's early work included illustrations of the girdles, emphasizing their importance in understanding the anatomy of the Elasmosaurus.
  • Later Oversights: Despite the girdles' initial significance, Cope later omitted them from his publications, and their disappearance was not formally addressed.
  • Modern Analysis: Current research seeks to uncover the events leading to the loss of these important fossil components and what this means for paleontology.
The disappearance of the limb girdles represents a significant gap in the fossil record. The girdles provide insights into the Elasmosaurus's locomotive abilities and evolutionary adaptations. Understanding why and how these parts were lost and the broader implications for paleontological research.

Solving the Fossil Puzzle: A Call to Paleontological Preservation

The mystery surrounding the missing limb girdles of Elasmosaurus platyurus underscores the necessity of robust preservation and management protocols in paleontology. As researchers continue to investigate this historical puzzle, the broader scientific community can leverage this event to reinforce the importance of safeguarding fossils. By doing so, the paleontological community will improve the integrity of the fossil record, ensure continued advancements in our understanding of prehistoric life, and protect the legacy of scientific discovery for future generations.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1660/062.121.0403, Alternate LINK

Title: The Mystery Of Elasmosaurus Platyurus Cope 1868 – Where Is The Rest Of The Type Specimen?

Journal: Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science

Publisher: Kansas Academy of Science

Authors: Jane P. Davidson, Michael J. Everhart

Published: 2018-09-01

Everything You Need To Know

1

When and where was the Elasmosaurus platyurus discovered, and who was responsible for its initial examination and naming?

Elasmosaurus platyurus was discovered in 1867 by Dr. Theophilus Turner in western Kansas. It was then transported to the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Edward D. Cope examined and named it in 1868. The initial find included over 100 vertebrae, skull parts, and complete pectoral and pelvic girdles, marking it as the largest known plesiosaur at the time.

2

What exactly disappeared from the Elasmosaurus platyurus fossil, and what makes this disappearance so puzzling?

The pectoral and pelvic girdles of Elasmosaurus platyurus disappeared within four years of its discovery and description by Edward D. Cope. This is particularly puzzling because these girdles were initially documented and illustrated by Cope, highlighting their importance to understanding the anatomy and movement of this ancient marine reptile. Their disappearance occurred without any official explanation from the Academy of Natural Sciences, raising concerns about the preservation and handling of significant scientific resources.

3

Why are the missing limb girdles of Elasmosaurus platyurus so important for understanding this ancient marine reptile?

The missing limb girdles of Elasmosaurus platyurus are significant because they provide key insights into its locomotive abilities and evolutionary adaptations. The pectoral and pelvic girdles are essential for understanding how Elasmosaurus moved in the water and how it adapted to its environment. The absence of these parts creates a gap in the fossil record, making a complete understanding of Elasmosaurus more difficult. Their loss hampers comprehensive biomechanical analysis, hindering a complete functional and evolutionary interpretation of Elasmosaurus.

4

How did Edward D. Cope's work contribute to both the discovery and the subsequent controversy surrounding Elasmosaurus platyurus?

Edward D. Cope's initial reconstruction of Elasmosaurus platyurus was controversial due to his placement of the head on the 'wrong end' of the skeleton. Despite his expertise, this error led to skepticism and discussion within the scientific community. Furthermore, although he initially included the pectoral and pelvic girdles in his descriptions and illustrations, he later omitted them from his publications. The initial mistake is often repeated in popular media, while the fate of the missing girdles receives less attention.

5

What broader implications does the mystery surrounding the missing Elasmosaurus platyurus limb girdles have for the field of paleontology?

The disappearance of the limb girdles from the Elasmosaurus platyurus fossil highlights the need for robust preservation and management protocols in paleontology. The loss of these significant parts from a type specimen raises questions about the preservation and handling of invaluable scientific resources. The paleontological community should improve the integrity of the fossil record, ensure continued advancements in understanding prehistoric life, and protect the legacy of scientific discovery for future generations.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.