Woman confidently standing in a field of flowers, symbolizing freedom from stress urinary incontinence.

Stress Urinary Incontinence: Is Surgery Still the Best Option?

Soraya Malik in Health & Wellness December 2025 • 4 min read.

"Explore the latest insights on surgical management of stress urinary incontinence, including the role of mid-urethral slings (MUS) and emerging alternatives."

For nearly two decades, mid-urethral sling (MUS) procedures have been a primary surgical choice for gynecologists and urologists treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women worldwide. Introduced in the late 1990s, MUS quickly became a popular solution, offering a seemingly straightforward approach to a common and often debilitating condition.

The effectiveness of MUS has been well-documented, with long-term results comparable to traditional methods like Burch colposuspension and fascial pubovaginal slings. However, the rise of MUS hasn't been without its challenges. Concerns over synthetic mesh, legal issues, and negative media coverage have led to a re-evaluation of surgical options for SUI.

This article explores the current state of surgical management for stress urinary incontinence, examining the role of MUS, the impact of recent controversies, and the emergence of alternative treatments. Whether you're a woman experiencing SUI or a healthcare professional seeking the latest insights, this overview will provide a comprehensive look at the options available today.

Understanding Mid-Urethral Sling (MUS) Procedures: How Do They Work?

Woman confidently standing in a field of flowers, symbolizing freedom from stress urinary incontinence.

MUS procedures involve placing a synthetic tape under the urethra to provide support and prevent leakage during activities that increase abdominal pressure, such as coughing or sneezing. Unlike previous sling techniques, MUS utilizes small incisions and trocar needles to position the tape mid-urethra, rather than under the bladder neck.

The main types of MUS procedures include:

Retropubic MUS: The tape is inserted vaginally and passed behind the pubic bone, exiting through two small suprapubic incisions.
Transobturator Sling (TO): The tape is inserted through the obturator foramina, reducing the risk of bladder injury. This approach has two variations: outside-in (Delorme technique) and inside-out (de Leval technique).
Mini-Slings: These single-incision slings are anchored to the obturator fascia and muscle, avoiding the retropubic space altogether.

Despite their widespread use, the popularity of synthetic MUS has faced challenges due to medicolegal issues, class actions, and negative publicity. Many companies have stopped producing these slings, and stricter government regulations have been implemented. This has led to a decline in MUS procedures in some regions, prompting a renewed interest in alternative surgical options.

Making Informed Decisions About SUI Surgery

The surgical landscape for stress urinary incontinence is constantly evolving. While MUS procedures remain a viable option for many women, it's crucial to be aware of the potential risks and benefits, as well as the availability of alternative treatments. Consulting with a qualified healthcare professional is essential to determine the best course of action based on your individual needs and circumstances.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

What is stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and what surgical options are available for it?

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a condition where urine leaks during activities that increase abdominal pressure, like coughing or sneezing. The primary surgical choices for SUI include mid-urethral sling (MUS) procedures and alternative treatments. MUS involves placing a synthetic tape under the urethra for support, preventing leakage. The landscape also includes options beyond MUS, though the article does not specify these other methods, highlighting the need for consultation to determine the best approach for individual needs.

How do mid-urethral sling (MUS) procedures work, and what are the different types?

MUS procedures involve inserting a synthetic tape under the urethra to provide support and stop urine leakage during activities that increase abdominal pressure. The tape is strategically placed to reinforce the urethra. There are three main types of MUS procedures: Retropubic MUS, where the tape is passed behind the pubic bone; Transobturator Sling (TO), which uses the obturator foramina and comes in outside-in (Delorme) and inside-out (de Leval) variations to reduce bladder injury risk; and Mini-Slings, anchored to the obturator fascia and muscle, bypassing the retropubic space entirely.

What are the main advantages of using mid-urethral slings (MUS) for treating SUI?

MUS procedures offer a seemingly straightforward solution with well-documented effectiveness for stress urinary incontinence. Their long-term results have been comparable to traditional methods like Burch colposuspension and fascial pubovaginal slings. The MUS procedures, especially in the early days, were popular because they were considered less invasive and offered quicker recovery times compared to older techniques.

Why has the popularity of mid-urethral slings (MUS) declined in some areas, and what are the implications of this?

The popularity of synthetic MUS has faced challenges due to medicolegal issues, class actions, and negative publicity. Many companies have stopped producing these slings, and stricter government regulations have been implemented. This decline has led to a renewed interest in alternative surgical options for SUI. The implications are that patients and healthcare professionals need to be aware of the evolving landscape and the availability of various treatments. Moreover, more research and development are needed to evaluate alternative treatments.

How should someone make an informed decision about SUI surgery, considering the current landscape?

Making an informed decision requires awareness of the potential risks and benefits of different surgical options, including MUS procedures and alternative treatments. Consulting with a qualified healthcare professional is crucial to determine the best course of action based on individual needs and circumstances. This involves discussing personal medical history, lifestyle, and the severity of SUI symptoms to tailor the treatment plan accordingly. Given the controversies and developments, staying informed and working closely with a healthcare provider is paramount.