Heart attack types, STEMI vs NSTEMI with bypass concept.

STEMI vs. NSTEMI: Which Heart Attack Is Riskier After Bypass?

Beau Callahan in Health & Wellness December 2025 • 4 min read.

"A new study uses propensity score matching to analyze long-term outcomes, offering reassurance for both STEMI and NSTEMI patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB)."

When a heart attack strikes, it's categorized into two main types: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). STEMI is typically caused by a complete blockage of a coronary artery, while NSTEMI involves a severe narrowing but not complete obstruction. Although both are serious, there's been a debate about which poses a greater risk, especially when surgery like a coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is needed.

For years, doctors have strived to understand if one type of heart attack leads to worse outcomes after bypass surgery. Some studies suggested STEMI might be more dangerous due to its more severe nature. However, pinpointing the exact risks has been challenging because many factors influence a patient's recovery.

To shed light on this, a team of researchers conducted a detailed study using a technique called propensity score matching. This method helps to balance the playing field, comparing similar patients with STEMI and NSTEMI to see if there are real differences in their outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB)—a type of bypass surgery done without stopping the heart.

Unpacking the Research: Comparing STEMI and NSTEMI After OPCAB

Heart attack types, STEMI vs NSTEMI with bypass concept.

The study, published in the Journal of Korean Medical Science, looked back at data from 320 patients who underwent OPCAB within four weeks of having a heart attack. Of these, 83 patients had STEMI (group I), and 237 had NSTEMI (group II). The researchers meticulously gathered information on each patient's condition before surgery, the details of the operation, and their health outcomes afterward.

Before diving into the results, it's important to understand propensity score matching. Essentially, the researchers used statistical tools to create two groups of patients—STEMI and NSTEMI—that were as similar as possible in terms of other health factors that could affect their outcomes. This helped them isolate the impact of the heart attack type itself.

Balancing the Groups: Before matching, the STEMI group tended to have higher EuroSCOREs (a measure of surgical risk), more emergency surgeries, and greater use of intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) and emergency angioplasty.
Matching Success: After propensity score matching, the researchers created two groups of 74 patients each, with no significant differences in their pre-operative conditions.
Key Outcomes Measured: The study focused on 30-day mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), overall survival, and freedom from MACCE over eight years.

So, what did they find? The good news is that after propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in outcomes between the STEMI and NSTEMI groups. This means that patients who underwent OPCAB for either type of heart attack had similar chances of survival and freedom from major complications.

The Takeaway: Reassuring News for Heart Attack Patients

This study offers a comforting message for individuals facing bypass surgery after a heart attack. Regardless of whether it's a STEMI or NSTEMI, the long-term outlook after OPCAB appears to be similar. While STEMI patients may present with more urgent and complex pre-operative conditions, these differences don't necessarily translate to worse outcomes after surgery. The findings underscores the importance of considering OPCAB as a viable option for both types of heart attacks, potentially leading to positive outcomes.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.2.153, Alternate LINK

Title: Long Term Results Of St-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Versus Non-St-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Subject: General Medicine

Journal: Journal of Korean Medical Science

Publisher: Korean Academy of Medical Sciences

Authors: Soonchang Hong, Young-Nam Youn, Gijong Yi, Kyung-Jong Yoo

Published: 2012-01-01

Everything You Need To Know

What are the main differences between STEMI and NSTEMI heart attacks?

A ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or STEMI, is a type of heart attack caused by a complete blockage of a coronary artery. This complete blockage prevents blood flow to a portion of the heart muscle, leading to significant damage if not treated promptly. This is contrasted by a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or NSTEMI, where there is a severe narrowing but not a complete obstruction of a coronary artery. The difference in severity stems from the degree of blood flow disruption, with STEMI typically causing more immediate and extensive damage due to the complete lack of blood supply. The article explores if these differences in initial severity impact long-term outcomes after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB).

What is off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) and propensity score matching?

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is a type of bypass surgery performed without stopping the heart. During OPCAB, surgeons bypass blocked coronary arteries by grafting new vessels to restore blood flow to the heart muscle, all while the heart continues to beat. This is different from traditional CABG which uses a heart-lung machine to stop the heart. Propensity score matching is a statistical technique used to compare patient outcomes in this study. This method helps balance the playing field by creating groups of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI who are as similar as possible in terms of other health factors to isolate the impact of the heart attack type on their outcomes. This is essential for accurate comparisons because it accounts for variables, such as the EuroSCORE which reflects the risk of surgery, and factors such as the usage of Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP).

Why is propensity score matching important in this study?

The significance of propensity score matching is to improve the reliability of the study's findings by reducing bias. By matching patients with similar characteristics, researchers can more accurately determine if differences in outcomes, such as survival rates and major complications, are truly related to the type of heart attack (STEMI or NSTEMI) rather than other factors. This approach is critical because patients with STEMI and NSTEMI may differ in several respects, including their overall health, the severity of their condition, and the treatments they receive before surgery. By controlling these differences, propensity score matching provides a clearer picture of the specific risks associated with each type of heart attack in the context of OPCAB.

What were the main findings regarding outcomes for STEMI and NSTEMI patients?

The findings suggest that after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB), patients with STEMI and NSTEMI experience similar long-term outcomes. This means that, regardless of the type of heart attack, the chances of survival and freedom from major complications over an eight-year period are comparable. This result is reassuring for patients and medical professionals because it indicates that the initial differences in heart attack severity, such as complete artery blockage in STEMI, do not necessarily lead to worse outcomes after surgery. The study's results emphasize the importance of considering OPCAB as a viable treatment for both types of heart attacks, offering a positive outlook for individuals facing bypass surgery after a heart attack.

What are the implications of these findings for patients and healthcare providers?

The implications of the study's findings are twofold. First, it offers reassurance to patients facing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) after a heart attack. Knowing that long-term outcomes are similar regardless of whether they had a STEMI or NSTEMI can reduce anxiety and provide a sense of hope. Second, the study reinforces the value of OPCAB as a suitable option for both STEMI and NSTEMI patients. This could potentially influence treatment decisions, encouraging the use of OPCAB in a broader range of patients and potentially leading to better patient outcomes. However, the results are specific to OPCAB and may not apply to other types of bypass surgery or treatment approaches.