Cityscape at night with interconnected emergency rooms and police stations, symbolizing unreported violence.

Silent Victims: Unmasking the Alarming Rate of Unreported Violent Injuries

"A groundbreaking study reveals that a significant portion of violent injuries go unreported to law enforcement, hindering prevention efforts and demanding a new approach to public safety."


Interpersonal violence remains a pervasive issue in the United States, casting a long shadow over communities and healthcare systems alike. Despite ongoing efforts to curb violence, it continues to be a leading cause of both death and injury. Effective prevention strategies rely heavily on accurate data to understand the scope, patterns, and underlying causes of violence. Law enforcement data has traditionally been a cornerstone for these efforts, yet it paints an incomplete picture.

A concerning reality, highlighted by the U.S. Department of Justice’s National Crime Victimization Survey, is that a significant number of violent crimes resulting in injury go unreported. In fact, over half (52.6%) of these incidents never make their way into official law enforcement records. This gap in data presents a major obstacle for cities striving to develop effective strategies to prevent and respond to violence, as they are operating with incomplete information.

Addressing this critical blind spot requires innovative approaches to data collection and analysis. While studies have examined specific types of unreported violence, such as firearm injuries, a broader understanding of all forms of violent injury is needed. A recent study delved into this issue by quantifying the proportion of violence-related injuries treated in emergency departments (ED) that were not known to law enforcement. The goal was to assess the potential for ED data to complement police data and enhance a city's overall understanding of violence.

The Hidden Numbers: Quantifying Unreported Violence

Cityscape at night with interconnected emergency rooms and police stations, symbolizing unreported violence.

The study, conducted as part of a municipal violence prevention program, was a collaborative effort between an urban ED with a Level 1 trauma designation and two urban police departments in the Atlanta metropolitan area. This partnership facilitated the implementation of a comprehensive violence prevention program and surveillance system within the ED. With institutional review board exemption granted, nurses were tasked with screening every patient for violent injury. When present, they meticulously recorded the geographic location of the incident (e.g., address, street intersection, business name) and the date and time it occurred. To protect patient privacy, only incidents occurring in public places were included, excluding any violence within private residences.

Each incident recorded by the hospital was carefully reviewed and geocoded to pinpoint its exact coordinates for mapping purposes. Data on violent crimes causing interpersonal injury (aggravated assault, rape, homicide) already known to law enforcement were gathered from official police reports. To determine the percentage of violent injuries treated in the ED and unknown to police, the researchers employed a spatiotemporal filter. This filter assessed the proportion of non-overlapping events using various time and distance buffers, allowing for a nuanced understanding of reporting patterns.

  • Spatiotemporal Analysis: Researchers used various time (4, 8, and 12 hours) and distance buffers (100, 500, and 1000 meters) to determine if an ED-recorded incident was also present in police records.
  • Jurisdictional Differences: The study focused on incidents within Police Jurisdictions A and B to account for variations in reporting.
  • Data Collection Period: Data was collected from November 20, 2015, to May 4, 2017.
The results of the study revealed a significant discrepancy between ED data and police reports. Of the 1,654 violent injuries identified through the ED screening program, 1,122 (67.8%) occurred in a public location. Among these, 455 incidents had sufficient location and time information for mapping. Shockingly, the percentage of incidents that went unreported to police was 83.2% in police jurisdiction A and 93.1% in police jurisdiction B, based on a 500-meter distance buffer and an 8-hour time buffer. Sensitivity analyses using different time and distance buffers did not significantly alter these findings, reinforcing the conclusion that a large proportion of violent injuries remain unknown to law enforcement.

A Call to Action: Bridging the Data Gap for Safer Communities

This study underscores the urgent need to bridge the data gap between hospital-treated violent incidents and those known to law enforcement. By combining ED data with police records, cities can gain a more complete and accurate picture of violence in their communities. This comprehensive understanding is crucial for developing targeted prevention strategies and allocating resources effectively. Furthermore, these findings highlight the value of cross-sectoral partnerships and the importance of ED-collected violence data in improving public safety and preventing future harm.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5139, Alternate LINK

Title: Proportion Of Violent Injuries Unreported To Law Enforcement

Subject: Internal Medicine

Journal: JAMA Internal Medicine

Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)

Authors: Daniel T. Wu, Jasmine C. Moore, Daniel A. Bowen, Laura M. Mercer Kollar, Elizabeth W. Mays, Thomas R. Simon, Steven A. Sumner

Published: 2019-01-01

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is the main problem highlighted by the study?

The study reveals that a significant number of violent injuries are not reported to law enforcement, creating a data gap. The study highlights how this gap hinders effective violence prevention strategies. It mentions that in specific police jurisdictions, a significant percentage of incidents treated in emergency departments (ED) were not known to law enforcement, using ED data to complement police data. This indicates the need for innovative approaches to data collection and analysis to improve public safety.

2

How was the data analyzed to compare the ED and police data?

A spatiotemporal filter was utilized to compare data from emergency departments (ED) and police reports. This filter used various time (4, 8, and 12 hours) and distance buffers (100, 500, and 1000 meters) to determine if an ED-recorded incident was also present in police records. The use of a spatiotemporal filter allowed researchers to determine the percentage of violent injuries treated in the ED that were unknown to police, enhancing the understanding of reporting patterns and the data gap.

3

What were the key findings regarding unreported violent injuries?

The study's findings indicated a substantial disparity between data from emergency departments (ED) and police reports. Specifically, a large percentage of violent injuries identified through the ED screening program went unreported to police. In police jurisdiction A, 83.2% of incidents, and in police jurisdiction B, 93.1% of incidents were unreported, based on a 500-meter distance buffer and an 8-hour time buffer. This discrepancy underscores the need for a more complete understanding of violence within communities.

4

Why are partnerships between hospitals and police departments important?

Cross-sectoral partnerships, such as those between emergency departments (ED) and police departments, are important for developing comprehensive violence prevention programs. This study specifically involved collaboration between an urban ED with a Level 1 trauma designation and two urban police departments in the Atlanta metropolitan area. Such partnerships enable more effective data collection and analysis, leading to the development of targeted prevention strategies and improved public safety. These partnerships can more effectively bridge the data gap.

5

What does the term "data gap" mean in this context?

The data gap refers to the difference between the number of violent injuries treated in emergency departments (ED) and the number reported to law enforcement. A significant portion of violent injuries go unreported, hindering efforts to develop effective strategies to prevent and respond to violence. By bridging this data gap through collaboration and innovative data collection methods, cities can gain a more accurate understanding of violence and better allocate resources for public safety, thus enhancing the prevention of future harm.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.