Medieval scribe adding a female figure to a royal genealogy scroll.

Royal Women: Unveiling the Power and Perceptions on the Canterbury Roll

"Discover how medieval scribes shaped the narrative of female influence and legitimacy in England's royal lineage during the tumultuous 15th century."


The Canterbury Roll, a fifteenth-century genealogical record of the English kings, offers a fascinating window into the era's social and political dynamics. While primarily focused on male rulers, the roll's inclusion of women—and the manner in which they are portrayed—provides invaluable insights into the prevailing attitudes toward women, their roles, and their influence within the monarchy.

This article delves into a recent study analyzing how various scribes depicted women on the Canterbury Roll, particularly during the tumultuous period leading up to and including the Wars of the Roses. By examining the choices made in including or omitting certain women, and by analyzing the narratives surrounding them, we can glean a deeper understanding of how medieval society perceived female power and its impact on royal legitimacy.

We'll explore how scribes used female figures to reinforce or challenge existing power structures, legitimize royal claims, and navigate the complex expectations placed upon aristocratic women. The Canterbury Roll, therefore, becomes not just a historical document, but a compelling reflection of the social and political currents shaping fifteenth-century England.

How the Canterbury Roll Defined a 'Woman's Role' in Medieval England

Medieval scribe adding a female figure to a royal genealogy scroll.

The scribes who created and amended the Canterbury Roll operated within a specific social framework. Their choices in depicting women reflected a desire to uphold the patriarchal structure of fifteenth-century England. According to the original research, women were primarily valued for their ancestry, their ability to produce successful lineages, and their connections to powerful or successful kings.

In essence, a "good" woman, according to the roll-maker's perspective, was one who reinforced the existing power dynamics. The inclusion of women with "useful" ancestry or those who facilitated strategic alliances through marriage served to legitimize the king's claim to the throne. Examples include:

  • Cenica: Remembered solely for bringing Maximian the Great a kingdom.
  • Isabella of France: Included to symbolize the alliance between England and France, solidifying future claims.
  • Matilda of Scotland: Her Anglo-Saxon lineage strengthened Henry I's claim to the throne.
  • Saint Helena: Celebrated as the mother of Constantine, ensuring a line of successful rulers.
Conversely, women who deviated from these expected roles faced either erasure from the record or negative portrayals. Their actions were often linked to periods of unrest or instability, reinforcing the idea that female independence or exercise of power led to undesirable consequences for the kingdom. This approach underscores the scribes' commitment to a traditional view of women's place in society, one that prioritized conformity and subservience to male authority.

What the Canterbury Roll Tells Us About Power, Perceptions, and Royal Legitimacy

The Canterbury Roll offers a unique glimpse into the complex interplay of power, gender, and societal expectations in fifteenth-century England. Through the choices made by its scribes, we see how women were strategically deployed to legitimize royal claims, reinforce traditional hierarchies, and navigate a period of intense political upheaval.

Despite the changing landscape of female influence during this era, particularly with figures like Margaret of Anjou and Elizabeth Woodville challenging conventional roles, the scribes largely adhered to a traditional framework. This suggests a prevailing concern with maintaining order and stability, even if it meant overlooking or downplaying the complexities of female agency.

Ultimately, the Canterbury Roll serves as a valuable reminder that historical documents are not merely neutral records of events. They are products of their time, shaped by the biases, beliefs, and agendas of their creators. By critically examining these sources, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of the past and its enduring impact on the present.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1353/cjm.2017.0004, Alternate LINK

Title: A Woman'S Role: How Scribes Depicted Women On The Fifteenth-Century Canterbury Roll

Subject: General Medicine

Journal: Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies

Publisher: Project Muse

Authors: Thandi Parker

Published: 2017-01-01

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is the Canterbury Roll, and why is it significant in the context of understanding medieval England?

The Canterbury Roll is a fifteenth-century genealogical record of English kings. It's important because it provides insights into the social and political dynamics of the time, especially how women were viewed and how their depictions influenced perceptions of royal legitimacy. The roll's portrayal of women reflects the prevailing attitudes towards their roles and influence within the monarchy.

2

What qualities or roles of women were considered valuable, as reflected in the Canterbury Roll?

The scribes primarily valued women for their ancestry, their ability to produce successful lineages, and their connections to powerful or successful kings. Women like Cenica, Isabella of France, Matilda of Scotland, and Saint Helena, were included due to their contributions to royal claims or alliances. Their inclusion served to legitimize the king's claim to the throne by highlighting beneficial connections and reinforcing existing power dynamics.

3

How did the Canterbury Roll portray women who did not conform to traditional expectations?

Women who deviated from the expected roles, such as those who exercised power independently, faced either erasure or negative portrayals on the Canterbury Roll. This approach reinforced the idea that female independence or the exercise of power led to instability, thus supporting the traditional view of women's place in society, which prioritized conformity and subservience to male authority. This reinforces the scribes' commitment to the patriarchal structure.

4

How did the Canterbury Roll use the depiction of women to legitimize royal claims?

The depictions on the Canterbury Roll legitimized royal claims by showcasing women's contributions to the royal lineage, alliances, and the stability of the kingdom. The inclusion of specific women and their achievements helped to reinforce the legitimacy of the ruling monarchs. For example, Isabella of France's inclusion symbolized the alliance between England and France, and Matilda of Scotland's Anglo-Saxon lineage strengthened Henry I's claim to the throne.

5

What does the Canterbury Roll reveal about the relationship between power, gender, and societal expectations in medieval England?

The Canterbury Roll demonstrates the interplay of power, gender, and societal expectations in fifteenth-century England. Through the scribes' choices, the roll reveals how women were strategically used to legitimize royal claims, reinforce hierarchies, and navigate political upheaval. Analyzing the Canterbury Roll helps in understanding how scribes shaped narratives of female influence within the English monarchy.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.