Quantile Aggregation: How to Navigate Uncertainty in Risk and Economics
"Discover analytical bounds that unify results and offer insights into complex systems."
In fields like finance, risk management, statistics, and operations research, quantile aggregation under conditions of dependence uncertainty is a long-standing challenge. Imagine needing to estimate the total risk of a portfolio where you know the individual assets' risk profiles but not how they might interact. This is where quantile aggregation comes into play, helping to find the possible values of quantiles of an aggregate variable. This aggregate could represent a total risk or the completion time of a task, making it crucial for informed decision-making.
Quantile aggregation is essentially about understanding the range of possible outcomes when combining several uncertain quantities. Instead of knowing exactly how these quantities depend on each other, we only have information about their individual distributions. More formally, the problem involves finding the highest and lowest possible quantiles of the sum of these variables, given their marginal distributions. For example, if you're summing random variables X1 through Xn, you know the distribution of each variable separately, but not how they correlate. Quantile aggregation helps determine the possible range of values for a specific quantile of the total sum.
This field draws on a rich history in probability theory, with applications spanning diverse areas. However, due to the complexity arising from unspecified dependence structures, finding analytical solutions has been notoriously difficult. In this article, we explore a recent advancement that offers a new perspective on this problem: convolution bounds. This approach not only provides new analytical bounds but also unifies existing results, offering a more comprehensive understanding of quantile aggregation.
Unlocking New Insights with Convolution Bounds
Convolution bounds, derived from recent research on inf-convolution of quantile-based risk measures, represent a significant step forward in tackling the challenges of quantile aggregation. They offer a way to establish new analytical bounds, which unify every analytical result available in quantile aggregation and enlighten our understanding of these methods. These bounds are the best available in general, are easy to compute, and sharp in many relevant cases. The convolution bounds also allow for interpretability on the extremal dependence structure.
- Versatile Applications: Applicable to both quantile and RVaR aggregations.
- Unified Framework: Combines existing sharpness results and new cases.
- Tractable Extremal Structures: Enables interpretation and approximation.
- Computational Efficiency: Convenient and efficient computation.
The Future of Understanding Uncertainty
The theoretical difficulty in quantile aggregation leaves ample room for future adventures and challenges. For instance, the sharpness of convolution bounds under general conditions, other than those in Theorems 1, 2, A.1 and A.2, is an open question. For the interested reader, we connect our results to the theory of joint mixability in Appendix E, where many questions remain to be open. Additional information on the dependence structure, other than the marginal distributions, can be incorporated in the quantile aggregation problem, and it usually leads to highly challenging questions; see e.g., Bernard et al. (2017a,b) and Bartl et al. (2022). In view of the broad appearance of quantile aggregation, its application domain includes many problems in economics, finance, risk management, statistics, and scheduling, in addition to the two applications discussed Section 2. We mention some applications in Appendix G, on which many relevant questions warrant thorough future investigation.