Futuristic nurse scanning a patient's skin for pressure ulcer risk.

Pressure Ulcer Prevention: Is PURPOSE-T the Future of Risk Assessment?

"A new clinical evaluation tool aims to revolutionize pressure ulcer risk assessment and improve patient outcomes. Learn how PURPOSE-T is changing the game."


Pressure ulcers, also known as bedsores, are localized injuries to the skin and underlying tissue, often occurring over bony prominences. These ulcers pose a significant threat to patient health and safety, leading to pain, infection, prolonged hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. Effective prevention is critical, and structured risk assessment is the cornerstone of any successful prevention strategy.

Traditional pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments (PU-RAIs) have faced criticism for their methodological limitations, inadequate conceptual frameworks, and inconsistent inclusion of key risk factors like skin status. These shortcomings can undermine the accuracy and effectiveness of risk assessments, potentially leading to inadequate preventative measures.

To address these challenges, researchers have developed a new instrument called the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool (PURPOSE-T). This article explores the clinical evaluation of PURPOSE-T, examining its psychometric properties, clinical usability, and potential to improve pressure ulcer prevention in healthcare settings.

PURPOSE-T: A New Approach to Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment

Futuristic nurse scanning a patient's skin for pressure ulcer risk.

PURPOSE-T was created to improve limitations of existing instruments, incorporating key elements:

  • A systematic review of existing literature.
  • A consensus study involving experts and healthcare professionals.
  • Development of a robust conceptual framework.
  • Rigorous pre-testing and refinement.

The clinical evaluation of PURPOSE-T involved 230 patients across various risk levels and healthcare settings. Expert nurses and ward/community nurses conducted paired assessments using PURPOSE-T, and the tool's reliability, validity, and usability were evaluated. Key findings from the clinical evaluation include:

The Future of Pressure Ulcer Prevention

The clinical evaluation of PURPOSE-T demonstrated very good inter-rater and test-retest reliability, indicating its consistency and accuracy. The tool also showed moderate to high convergent validity, meaning it aligns with other established measures of similar constructs.

Nurses found PURPOSE-T easy to use, thorough, and helpful in identifying patients at risk for pressure ulcers. The tool's color-coded system and detailed skin assessment were particularly well-received. These features promoted careful skin examination and facilitated communication among healthcare providers.

PURPOSE-T represents a promising step forward in pressure ulcer prevention. By addressing the limitations of traditional risk assessment tools and incorporating evidence-based practices, PURPOSE-T has the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of pressure ulcers on healthcare systems. Further research is needed to evaluate the tool's long-term impact on care processes and patient outcomes, as well as to adapt and implement it in diverse healthcare settings.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1111/jan.13444, Alternate LINK

Title: Clinical Evaluation Of A New Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Instrument, The Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary Or Secondary Evaluation Tool (Purpose T)

Subject: General Nursing

Journal: Journal of Advanced Nursing

Publisher: Wiley

Authors: Susanne Coleman, Isabelle L. Smith, Elizabeth Mcginnis, Justin Keen, Delia Muir, Lyn Wilson, Nikki Stubbs, Carol Dealey, Sarah Brown, E. Andrea Nelson, Jane Nixon

Published: 2017-09-28

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is PURPOSE-T and what problem does it solve?

PURPOSE-T, or Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool, aims to revolutionize pressure ulcer risk assessment by providing a more accurate and consistent method for identifying patients at risk. It addresses the limitations of traditional PU-RAIs by incorporating a systematic review of literature, expert consensus, a robust conceptual framework, and rigorous pre-testing.

2

What are the limitations of traditional pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments (PU-RAIs)?

Traditional pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments (PU-RAIs) often suffer from methodological limitations, inadequate conceptual frameworks, and inconsistent inclusion of key risk factors like skin status. These shortcomings can lead to inaccurate risk assessments, resulting in inadequate preventative measures and potentially increasing the risk of pressure ulcers.

3

How was the clinical evaluation of PURPOSE-T conducted?

The clinical evaluation of PURPOSE-T involved assessing its reliability, validity, and usability across 230 patients in various healthcare settings. Expert nurses and ward/community nurses conducted paired assessments using PURPOSE-T. The evaluation demonstrated very good inter-rater and test-retest reliability, as well as moderate to high convergent validity.

4

How does PURPOSE-T differ from existing pressure ulcer risk assessment tools?

PURPOSE-T distinguishes itself by addressing the limitations of existing PU-RAIs through a comprehensive development process. This includes a systematic literature review, expert consensus, a robust conceptual framework, and rigorous pre-testing and refinement. By incorporating these elements, PURPOSE-T aims to provide a more accurate and reliable assessment of pressure ulcer risk, leading to improved prevention strategies and patient outcomes.

5

What did the clinical evaluation reveal about the reliability and validity of PURPOSE-T, and what aspects remain unclear?

The clinical evaluation of PURPOSE-T demonstrated very good inter-rater and test-retest reliability, indicating strong consistency and accuracy. It also showed moderate to high convergent validity, aligning with other established measures of similar constructs. However, the text does not specify predictive validity, sensitivity, and specificity. Therefore, while PURPOSE-T shows promise, further research may be needed to fully understand its effectiveness in diverse clinical settings and patient populations.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.