A global view of precision geodesy using laser and satellite technology.

Precision Geodesy: How Lunar Laser Ranging and Satellite Tech Are Revolutionizing Earth Monitoring

"Explore the cutting-edge techniques of sub-meter geodesy and their profound implications for understanding Earth's dynamic processes and geodynamics."


For geodesists and geophysicists, the advent of Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR), with precisions greater than 10 cm, provides a tool for measuring the dynamic earth and exploring its mysteries. LLR, however, is a fixed-site astronomical technique not readily adaptable to rapid observations in some of the earth's harsher environments or to the special logistics of those regions.

Orbiting artificial satellites, as well as being weather independent, offer techniques that make use of portable equipment. Unfortunately, this gain in versatility is at the expense of precision and accuracy. However, a technique of combining three Pacific basin LLR observatories collocated with Doppler tracking stations offers the possibility of recovering geodetic information at the sub-meter level. The actual level of the precision of recovery is dependent on the configuration adopted.

Simulation studies combining Doppler tracking of the Timation satellite in a multi-pass multi-station short arc mode with time transfer information and high precision LLR control show that sub-meter positions can be determined in a unique center of mass reference system over the entire Pacific basin. This precision should be improved once the satellite is also tracked by laser ranging devices, and transportable LLR becomes operational.

The Evolution of Satellite Geodesy: From Initial Goals to Geodynamic Investigations

A global view of precision geodesy using laser and satellite technology.

Over the last decade, satellite geodesy has seen the fulfillment of its initial goal of a unified global geodetic reference system and its branching into the exploration of the causative processes that perturb or limit classical geodetic reference systems or datums. The initial goals of the first satellite projects were station coordinates with an error radius of 10 m [Schmid, 1964].

Present production accuracies from the U.S. Navy Transit Satellite System are at the 1-m level [Anderle, 1973]. This level of precision is not acceptable for most geodynamic investigations where the annual variation of coordinates relative to a fixed or known reference system is of the order of 0.1 m. Thus, a number of proposals have been made to obtain higher precision and in many cases greater density of stations useful for geodynamic purposes [Plotkin, 1974; Siry, 1974; Silverberg, 1973].

Two production systems are currently available to geodesists:
  • System: The U.S. Navy Transit System; Type of Tracking: Doppler; Precision: 1-2 m
  • System: NASA Goddard Modlas; Type of Tracking: Satellite laser; Precision: 0.5 m
In addition, there are a number of observatory or fixed site systems that determine precise geodetic information:
  • System: SAO Baker Nunn; Type of Tracking: Optical; Precision: 10 m
  • System: SAO Laser; Type of Tracking: Satellite laser; Precision: 0.5 m
  • System: LLR Observations; Type of Tracking: Lunar laser ranging; Precision: 0.1 m
Precision is greater at fixed sites, and until some of the proposed transportable high precision instruments become available, it is necessary to seek combination solutions where the fixed sites are used to control the scale, orientation, and distortion of a network.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Precision Geodesy

These simulation studies indicate that the combination of present-day technology in time and frequency, laser ranging, and Doppler tracking can support a lightweight portable Doppler system that is capable of producing station values whose one-sigma errors are substantially less than 1 m. The simulations have inherent approximations built into them, but the order of the values is not expected to vary greatly. It must be recognized that the errors in both the Doppler technique and the laser techniques will continue to decrease and that the simulations presented here represent upper limits.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1029/gm019p0059, Alternate LINK

Title: A Simulation Study For Sub-Meter Geodesy In The Pacific Basin

Journal: The Geophysics of the Pacific Ocean Basin and Its Margin

Publisher: American Geophysical Union

Authors: P. Morgan

Published: 2013-03-17

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is the primary focus of precision geodesy, and how are Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) and satellite technology used?

Precision geodesy primarily focuses on measuring Earth's movements and understanding geodynamics. LLR, with its high precision, is used to measure the dynamic Earth. Satellite technology offers versatile, portable equipment for monitoring Earth, and combining LLR observatories with Doppler tracking stations allows the recovery of geodetic information at the sub-meter level. This combination enhances the ability to study Earth's processes and variations.

2

How does the precision of Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) compare to that of satellite-based methods like the U.S. Navy Transit System and NASA Goddard Modlas, and what are the implications?

LLR observations offer a precision of 0.1 m, making it a highly accurate fixed-site astronomical technique. In comparison, the U.S. Navy Transit System provides a precision of 1-2 m, and NASA Goddard Modlas has a precision of 0.5 m. The higher precision of LLR is crucial for certain geodynamic investigations where annual coordinate variations of about 0.1 m are significant. Although satellite-based systems offer versatility, they may sacrifice some precision compared to fixed-site LLR.

3

What are the limitations of Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR), and how do satellites address these issues in precision geodesy?

LLR, while highly precise, is a fixed-site technique that is not easily adaptable to harsh environments or remote regions. Satellites, on the other hand, use portable equipment that is weather-independent, making them more versatile. However, the trade-off is a reduction in precision. Combining techniques such as LLR with Doppler tracking stations and laser ranging devices, improves precision for satellite systems.

4

What are the significant advancements in satellite geodesy, and what role do they play in investigating geodynamic processes?

Satellite geodesy has evolved from establishing a unified global geodetic reference system to exploring the processes that affect classical geodetic systems. Initially, the goal was to determine station coordinates, with errors within a 10-meter radius. Modern systems like the U.S. Navy Transit System and NASA Goddard Modlas offer varying levels of precision. This information is critical in geodynamic investigations, where precise measurements of Earth's movements and variations are essential to understanding the planet's dynamics.

5

How can the integration of different technologies like Doppler tracking, laser ranging, and time/frequency measurements advance the field of precision geodesy?

The combination of present-day technology in time and frequency, laser ranging, and Doppler tracking can lead to the development of lightweight, portable Doppler systems. These systems can produce station values with errors less than 1 m. The continuous decrease in errors for both Doppler and laser techniques suggests that these integrated approaches will further improve precision in future geodetic studies, providing more accurate insights into Earth's dynamics.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.