Ultrasound measuring muscle thickness

Muscle Thickness Unveiled: How Ultrasound Measures Up

Elliot Brynn in Health & Wellness June 2025 • 4 min read.

"Explore the reliability of ultrasound in measuring muscle thickness and its impact on fitness and rehabilitation programs."

In the ever-evolving world of fitness and rehabilitation, accurately assessing muscle size is crucial. While methods like MRI and CT scans exist, they can be costly and expose individuals to radiation. This is where ultrasound (US) emerges as a valuable tool, offering a non-invasive and cost-effective way to measure muscle dimensions.

Ultrasound's ability to monitor muscle changes makes it ideal for tracking the effectiveness of diet and exercise programs, as well as rehabilitation efforts. By providing detailed insights into muscle thickness, US helps professionals tailor interventions and optimize outcomes for individuals seeking to improve their physical well-being.

However, the accuracy of ultrasound measurements is paramount. Even small variations in muscle thickness can be significant, highlighting the need for a reliable and precise measurement technique. This article explores the reliability of ultrasound in measuring muscle thickness, examining its applications and limitations in fitness and rehabilitation settings.

How Reliable is Ultrasound for Measuring Muscle Thickness?

A study published in the Brazilian Journal of Sports Medicine investigated the reliability of ultrasound in measuring the thickness of elbow and knee flexor and extensor muscles. Researchers Paulo Sergio Chagas Gomes, Cláudia de Mello Meirelles, and their team sought to determine the consistency of ultrasound measurements and quantify the typical error associated with this method.

The study involved 15 healthy volunteers who underwent ultrasound measurements of their elbow and knee muscles on two separate days. The researchers used specific anatomical landmarks to ensure consistent measurement sites. Here’s a breakdown of the key methods:

Participants: 15 healthy volunteers (8 women) with an average age of 33.9 years.
Ultrasound Technique: Two-dimensional B-mode ultrasound with a 7.5 MHz transducer.
Muscles Measured: Elbow flexors (EF), elbow extensors (EE), knee flexors (KF), and knee extensors (KE).
Measurement Sites: Anatomical landmarks identified and recorded to ensure consistency between measurements.
Procedure: Muscle thickness measured between the interfaces of bone and adipose tissue.

The researchers used statistical analyses, including ANOVA and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), to assess the reliability of the ultrasound measurements. They also calculated the coefficient of variation (CV) and typical error of measurement (TEM) to quantify the precision of the method.

The Verdict: Ultrasound as a Reliable Muscle Measurement Tool

The study concluded that ultrasound measurements of elbow flexors, elbow extensors, and knee extensors are highly reliable, making it a valuable tool for monitoring changes in muscle thickness due to diet, exercise, or rehabilitation programs. However, the measurements of knee flexors showed lower reliability and higher error, suggesting that this method may not be suitable for assessing changes in these muscles.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

What exactly is ultrasound and why is it used to measure muscles?

Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses sound waves to visualize structures within the body, including muscles. In the context of fitness and rehabilitation, it is used to measure muscle thickness. This is significant because it offers a cost-effective and radiation-free alternative to methods like MRI and CT scans for monitoring muscle size. However, the accuracy of ultrasound measurements is paramount, as even small variations in muscle thickness can be significant.

Why is it important to measure muscle thickness using ultrasound in fitness and rehabilitation?

Ultrasound is important because it provides a non-invasive and relatively inexpensive way to track changes in muscle thickness. This is particularly valuable for monitoring the effectiveness of diet and exercise programs, as well as rehabilitation efforts. By accurately measuring muscle dimensions, professionals can tailor interventions to optimize outcomes for individuals seeking to improve their physical well-being. It is important to note that ultrasound can also be used to assess soft tissues, tendons, and ligaments, providing a more comprehensive assessment.

How reliable is ultrasound for measuring different muscle groups?

The reliability of ultrasound measurements varies depending on the muscle group being assessed. Studies have shown that ultrasound measurements of elbow flexors, elbow extensors, and knee extensors are highly reliable. However, the measurements of knee flexors showed lower reliability and higher error, suggesting that this method may not be as suitable for assessing changes in these muscles. Therefore, practitioners should be aware of these limitations when using ultrasound to monitor muscle thickness.

What are Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), and how do they relate to ultrasound measurements of muscles?

Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) are statistical measures used to assess the reliability of measurements. In the context of ultrasound measurements of muscle thickness, ICC values indicate the degree of consistency between repeated measurements. A higher ICC value suggests greater reliability, meaning that the measurements are more consistent and reproducible. In research, ICC helps determine if ultrasound is a reliable tool for measuring muscle thickness across different muscle groups.

What do the Coefficient of Variation and Typical Error of Measurement tell us about precision when using ultrasound?

Coefficient of variation (CV) and typical error of measurement (TEM) are statistical measures used to quantify the precision of ultrasound measurements. The CV expresses the variability of measurements as a percentage of the mean, while the TEM indicates the expected error in a single measurement. Lower CV and TEM values indicate greater precision, meaning that the measurements are more consistent and less prone to error. These measures are important for determining the accuracy and reliability of ultrasound in assessing muscle thickness.