Two paths symbolizing stroke rehabilitation: one active, one passive.

Motor Relearning vs. Bobath: Which Therapy Best Prevents Post-Stroke Apathy?

Elliot Brynn in Health & Wellness June 2025 • 4 min read.

"A randomized controlled trial reveals motor relearning programs are significantly more effective than the Bobath approach in preventing apathy after stroke. Discover why early intervention is key."

Apathy, characterized by a lack of motivation, is a common and debilitating condition following a stroke. It not only hinders recovery but also diminishes overall quality of life. Recognizing and addressing apathy early is crucial for improving patient outcomes. The traditional Bobath approach and newer motor relearning programs are two common physiotherapy interventions in stroke rehabilitation.

Apathy is more than just feeling down, and it's a distinct neurological syndrome. Depression is a common consequence of stroke; apathy should be regarded as different from depression. Apathy impacts cognitive functions like planning and decision-making. This can significantly affect a person's ability to perform daily activities and engage in social interactions.

While medications have been explored, non-pharmacological approaches, like physiotherapy, play a vital role in stroke rehabilitation. Determining the most effective physiotherapy method to prevent apathy is essential for optimizing patient care. This article delves into a recent study comparing the effectiveness of the Bobath approach and motor relearning programs in preventing post-stroke apathy.

Motor Relearning Programs: Actively Engaging Patients for Better Outcomes

Two paths symbolizing stroke rehabilitation: one active, one passive.

A recent study investigated the impact of different physiotherapy approaches on preventing apathy after stroke. Researchers Liping Chen, Siqing Xiong, Yi Liu, Meiqing Lin, Lu Zhu, Renjia Zhong, Jiuhan Zhao, Wenjing Liu, Jirui Wang, and Xiuli Shang, compared motor relearning programs with the Bobath approach in a randomized controlled trial.

The study involved 488 patients recovering from acute stroke. These patients didn't show signs of apathy or depression when the study began. The participants were divided into two groups: one received physiotherapy based on motor relearning principles, and the other received the Bobath approach. Researchers then tracked the participants for a year, assessing their apathy levels at regular intervals using the Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinical (AES-C).

Motor Relearning Program: Emphasizes active patient participation in task-specific training. Focuses on relearning movements through practice and feedback.
Bobath Approach: Aims to normalize muscle tone and movement patterns. Often involves passive movements and handling techniques by the therapist.

The results showed that both groups experienced a decline in apathy symptoms over time; however, the motor relearning program was significantly more effective at reducing apathy. Patients who received the Bobath approach were 1.629 times more likely to develop post-stroke apathy compared to those in the motor relearning program. The study highlights the importance of active engagement and task-specific training in preventing apathy after stroke.

The Takeaway: Early Intervention with Motor Relearning Matters

This research suggests that incorporating motor relearning programs into early stroke rehabilitation can significantly reduce the risk of developing post-stroke apathy. By actively engaging patients in task-specific training, therapists can empower them to regain motor control and prevent the onset of apathy. This approach offers a promising avenue for improving the long-term well-being and recovery of stroke survivors.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

What is the main difference between the Motor Relearning Program and the Bobath approach in stroke rehabilitation?

The primary distinction lies in patient engagement and the approach to motor recovery. The Motor Relearning Program emphasizes active patient participation in task-specific training, focusing on relearning movements through practice and feedback. In contrast, the Bobath approach primarily aims to normalize muscle tone and movement patterns, often involving passive movements and handling techniques administered by the therapist. A recent study found that patients in the Motor Relearning Program were significantly less likely to develop post-stroke apathy compared to those undergoing the Bobath approach.

How does apathy differ from depression after a stroke, and why is it important to address it?

Apathy is a distinct neurological syndrome characterized by a lack of motivation, while depression is a mood disorder. Both can occur after a stroke, but they require different approaches. Apathy impacts cognitive functions such as planning and decision-making, which affects daily activities and social interaction. Recognizing and addressing apathy early is critical because it hinders recovery and diminishes the overall quality of life for stroke survivors. The study highlights that effective physiotherapy methods are crucial for improving patient outcomes related to apathy.

What were the key findings of the study comparing Motor Relearning Programs and the Bobath approach?

The study, which involved 488 acute stroke patients, found that Motor Relearning Programs were significantly more effective than the Bobath approach in preventing post-stroke apathy. Although both groups showed a decline in apathy symptoms over time, patients in the Bobath group were 1.629 times more likely to develop apathy compared to those in the Motor Relearning Program. The study used the Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinical (AES-C) to assess apathy levels over a year, demonstrating the long-term benefits of the Motor Relearning Program.

How can Motor Relearning Programs prevent post-stroke apathy, and why is early intervention crucial?

Motor Relearning Programs prevent post-stroke apathy by actively engaging patients in task-specific training, facilitating the relearning of movements through practice and feedback. This active participation empowers patients to regain motor control, which in turn reduces the risk of developing apathy. Early intervention is crucial because preventing apathy early can improve long-term well-being and recovery. Early use of Motor Relearning Programs allows for timely intervention, maximizing the potential for positive outcomes and minimizing the negative impact of apathy.

Who were the researchers involved in the study comparing Motor Relearning Programs and the Bobath approach, and what is the implication of their findings?

The study was conducted by researchers Liping Chen, Siqing Xiong, Yi Liu, Meiqing Lin, Lu Zhu, Renjia Zhong, Jiuhan Zhao, Wenjing Liu, Jirui Wang, and Xiuli Shang. Their findings highlight that incorporating Motor Relearning Programs into early stroke rehabilitation can significantly reduce the risk of developing post-stroke apathy. The implication of their research is that by actively engaging patients in task-specific training, therapists can help patients regain motor control and prevent the onset of apathy, thereby improving the long-term well-being and recovery of stroke survivors.