Mediterranean diet for heart health

Mediterranean Diet vs. Modern Meals: Which Dietary Score Predicts Heart Health?

Reese Marlowe in Health & Wellness December 2025 • 4 min read.

"A 40-year study compares Mediterranean and modern dietary scores, revealing surprising insights into heart disease mortality. Find out which approach truly protects your heart."

For decades, scientists have explored the link between what we eat and our risk of heart disease. From single nutrients to complex food combinations, the search for the perfect dietary blueprint continues. Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, making the need for effective preventative strategies increasingly vital.

But how do we best measure the impact of diet? Two main approaches dominate nutritional research: a-priori and a-posteriori methods. A-priori scores are constructed based on pre-existing knowledge and beliefs about what’s healthy, often drawing from established dietary patterns like the Mediterranean diet. Conversely, a-posteriori scores use statistical analysis to identify dietary patterns directly from the data, without preconceived notions. These data-driven scores can reveal surprising relationships but may be specific to the population being studied.

Now, a new study published in 'Scientific Reports' directly compares these two approaches, evaluating four different dietary scores—two a-priori and two a-posteriori—in predicting CHD mortality. By following a group of middle-aged men for 40 years, researchers have uncovered surprising insights into the strengths and limitations of each method, challenging some long-held beliefs about heart-healthy eating.

Decoding the Dietary Scores: Mediterranean vs. Modern

This groundbreaking study, published in "Scientific Reports", dives deep into the dietary habits of 1,214 men, aged 45-64, from the Italian Rural Areas of the Seven Countries Study. Originally examined in 1965, these men were followed for four decades to track the grim reaper of CHD-related deaths, offering a robust dataset to compare different dietary scoring methods.

Researchers pitted two a-priori scores against two a-posteriori scores:

Mediterranean Adequacy Index (MAI): An a-priori score, reflecting adherence to a traditional Mediterranean diet.
Median Score (MED): Another a-priori score, classifying food groups based on their potential health benefits or risks.
Factor Analysis (FA2): An a-posteriori score, derived from statistical analysis to identify dietary patterns within the study population.
Principal Components Analysis (PC2): A similar a-posteriori score, using a different statistical technique to uncover dietary patterns.

Dietary information was gathered through detailed histories, categorizing intake into 17 key food groups. Each dietary score then divided participants into three classes, from "unhealthy" to "healthy", allowing researchers to compare survival rates across different dietary patterns.

The Future of Dietary Guidelines: Personalization and Beyond

This study underscores the complexity of nutrition and the need for personalized approaches. While a-posteriori scores may capture population-specific patterns, a-priori scores offer practical guidance for individuals seeking to improve their heart health. Future research should focus on combining these approaches, leveraging data-driven insights to refine and personalize established dietary guidelines.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1038/s41598-018-33339-5, Alternate LINK

Title: Comparison Of Four Dietary Scores As Determinants Of Coronary Heart Disease Mortality

Subject: Multidisciplinary

Journal: Scientific Reports

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Authors: Alessandro Menotti, Paolo Emilio Puddu

Published: 2018-10-09

Everything You Need To Know

What is the Mediterranean Adequacy Index (MAI) and why is it important in the context of the study?

The Mediterranean Adequacy Index (MAI) is an a-priori score that assesses adherence to a traditional Mediterranean diet. This diet is characterized by high consumption of fruits, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, fish, and olive oil, with moderate intake of dairy and red meat. The MAI's significance lies in its ability to offer practical, readily applicable guidance for individuals looking to enhance their heart health. The study compares it against other dietary scores to determine its effectiveness in predicting Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) mortality. Understanding the MAI is vital because it embodies a well-established, evidence-based dietary pattern known for its cardiovascular benefits.

What is the Median Score (MED) and why is it significant in the context of the study?

The Median Score (MED) is an a-priori score, evaluating food groups based on their presumed health benefits or risks. Unlike data-driven scores, MED relies on pre-existing knowledge and beliefs about nutrition. This score provides a structured way to classify dietary components. Its significance stems from the fact that it represents a structured approach that relies on established nutritional knowledge to provide clarity for individuals. The effectiveness of MED, along with other a-priori and a-posteriori scores, is assessed in the study to predict and prevent CHD. Its implications include its influence on how dietary guidelines are framed and followed, potentially impacting public health recommendations.

What is Factor Analysis (FA2) and why is it significant?

Factor Analysis (FA2) is an a-posteriori score derived from statistical analysis of dietary data, specifically identifying dietary patterns within the study population. This data-driven approach uncovers relationships between food groups and health outcomes. Its significance lies in its ability to offer insights that might not be immediately apparent through conventional methods. This score reveals specific dietary patterns relevant to the study population, which can reveal valuable and potentially surprising associations. The implications of FA2 include the potential for creating population-specific dietary guidelines. This can lead to a more tailored approach to dietary recommendations and interventions.

What is Principal Components Analysis (PC2) and what does it mean in the context of the study?

Principal Components Analysis (PC2) is an a-posteriori score similar to Factor Analysis, but it uses a different statistical method to uncover dietary patterns. Both FA2 and PC2 are crucial because they reveal insights that a-priori scores might miss by analyzing eating habits from the data directly. Their significance lies in their potential to identify relationships between diet and health outcomes. The implications of PC2 include its impact on our understanding of which foods are associated with a lower risk of CHD in the study population. It may lead to more refined and individualized dietary guidelines based on the observed patterns.

Which dietary scores are being used in the study, and why is it important to use multiple scores?

The study assesses four dietary scores: The Mediterranean Adequacy Index (MAI), Median Score (MED), Factor Analysis (FA2), and Principal Components Analysis (PC2). The MAI and MED are a-priori scores, relying on existing nutritional knowledge, while FA2 and PC2 are a-posteriori scores derived from statistical analysis of dietary data. These scores are essential as they test different approaches to evaluating diet and heart health. The purpose of using multiple scores is to gain a comprehensive view of how various dietary patterns impact the risk of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) mortality. The implications include a more refined understanding of the strengths and limitations of different dietary scoring methods, informing future research and the development of personalized dietary guidelines.