Elderly person at a crossroads of healthcare decisions.

Medicare's Site-Neutral Payment Policy: Will It Limit Access to Long-Term Acute Care?

"A new study examines how Medicare's payment policy affects long-term acute care hospitals and access for older adults."


Long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs) play a vital role in the healthcare system, providing specialized care for patients with complex medical needs. However, concerns about unnecessary admissions and rising costs have led to the implementation of new policies aimed at optimizing resource allocation. One such policy is the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) site-neutral payment policy, designed to reduce reimbursements for less-ill individuals admitted to LTACHs.

A recent observational study delved into the potential effects of this site-neutral payment policy, focusing on its impact on LTACH admissions and access to care for older adults. By analyzing national Medicare data from 2011-2012, researchers sought to understand how the policy might affect different regions and hospitals with varying LTACH utilization rates.

The study's findings shed light on the proportion of LTACH admissions subject to site-neutral payment and the potential consequences for both high- and low-use regions and hospitals. The results offer valuable insights for healthcare providers, policymakers, and patients alike, as the industry navigates the evolving landscape of post-acute care.

Site-Neutral Payment: A Double-Edged Sword?

Elderly person at a crossroads of healthcare decisions.

The study revealed that a significant 41% of LTACH admissions would be subject to the site-neutral payment policy. This considerable proportion suggests a broad impact across the LTACH sector. However, the effect varies greatly among individual LTACHs, with a median of 40% of admissions potentially affected (ranging from 22% to 60%).

While the policy aims to curb unnecessary admissions, its consequences may disproportionately affect certain regions and hospitals:

  • High-Supply Regions: LTACHs in areas with greater market supply (more beds per capita) could see a greater impact, with approximately 47% of admissions affected.
  • High-Use Hospitals: Facilities with higher LTACH utilization rates might also experience a larger impact, potentially affecting 43% of their admissions.
  • Low-Supply Regions and Hospitals: Despite the policy's focus on high-use areas, nearly one-third of admissions in low-supply regions and hospitals could still be subject to lower payments.
This raises concerns about access to LTACH care in areas where it is already limited. The policy could inadvertently lead to consolidation or closure of LTACHs in these regions, potentially hindering recovery for older adults with complex medical needs.

Navigating the Future of Long-Term Acute Care

The site-neutral payment policy presents both opportunities and challenges for the LTACH sector. While it may help reduce unnecessary admissions and control costs, it also carries the risk of limiting access to care, particularly in underserved regions.

It's essential to monitor the policy's impact on LTACH access, patient outcomes, and healthcare costs. Further research is needed to determine whether individuals diverted from LTACHs can be effectively cared for in alternative settings, such as skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), without compromising their recovery.

As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, stakeholders must work together to ensure that older adults receive the appropriate level of care in the most cost-effective setting. This requires a nuanced approach that balances the need for fiscal responsibility with the importance of maintaining access to high-quality post-acute care services.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1111/jgs.15539, Alternate LINK

Title: Effect Of Site-Neutral Payment Policy On Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Use

Subject: Geriatrics and Gerontology

Journal: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Publisher: Wiley

Authors: Anil N. Makam, Oanh Kieu Nguyen, Benjamin Kirby, Michael E. Miller, Lei Xuan, Ethan A. Halm

Published: 2018-10-03

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is the main purpose of the site-neutral payment policy?

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) site-neutral payment policy is designed to reduce reimbursements for less-ill individuals admitted to Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals (LTACHs). This policy aims to optimize resource allocation within the healthcare system. Its significance lies in its potential to impact the financial viability of LTACHs, potentially affecting their ability to provide specialized care to patients with complex medical needs.

2

What role do Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals (LTACHs) play in healthcare?

Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals (LTACHs) provide specialized care for patients with complex medical needs. These hospitals play a vital role in the healthcare system by offering a high level of care to those who require it. They are particularly important for older adults with complex conditions. The implications are that changes to LTACHs, such as those driven by payment policies, can directly affect the availability of this specialized care for vulnerable populations.

3

How does the site-neutral payment policy affect Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals (LTACHs)?

The site-neutral payment policy affects Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals (LTACHs) by potentially reducing their reimbursements for certain admissions. The study indicates that a significant portion, about 41%, of LTACH admissions could be subject to this policy. The specific effect varies among hospitals and regions. The implications of this policy are far-reaching and could impact the financial stability of LTACHs and influence their ability to operate, particularly in regions with limited access to care.

4

Are there regional differences in how the site-neutral payment policy affects hospitals?

The study highlights that the site-neutral payment policy could have varying impacts across different regions. Specifically, it suggests that LTACHs in high-supply regions and those with higher utilization rates might experience a greater impact from the policy. Also, a considerable portion of admissions in low-supply regions and hospitals could still be subject to lower payments. These variations may lead to disparities in access to care, with potential closures or consolidations of LTACHs in certain areas.

5

What are the potential implications of this policy for patients and healthcare access?

The implementation of the site-neutral payment policy could affect the healthcare landscape by potentially limiting access to care in underserved regions. This could happen through the consolidation or closure of Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals (LTACHs) if the policy reduces their financial viability. This is particularly concerning for older adults with complex medical needs who rely on these specialized services. The policy's overall impact requires careful consideration to ensure access to quality care is preserved, and potentially even expanded.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.