18th-century doctors examining a glowing rock in a laboratory setting.

Medical Mysteries Solved: How Enlightenment Doctors Debunked Miracle Claims

"Uncover the fascinating history of how 18th-century physicians used science to challenge superstitions and establish medical authority."


In the 18th century, medical experts in France served in roles extending beyond the treatment of the sick. They provided their expertise to ecclesiastical authorities investigating miracles, aided state authorities in murder trials, and examined emerging medical theories. But what motivated elite physicians in Paris to investigate medical marvels, those strange cases where human bodies seemingly produced rocks, needles, or even animals?

This article explores how these investigations served a dual purpose. First, accounts from investigations acted as propaganda, showing the skill and knowledge of learned physicians and surgeons to the educated public. Second, the accounts served as pedagogical instruments useful for teaching medical practitioners how to be vigilant against deceit and superstition. By investigating medical marvels and exposing them as hoaxes, individual medical practitioners displayed their selfless dedication to enlightening readers and improving the quality of medical practice in France.

We will delve into the story of Geneviève Martin, a young woman whose body supposedly produced rocks, leading to an investigation that turned into a public debate, and we will explore the narratives that aimed to expose how common people and medical practitioners were tricked by impostors.

The Rise of Empiricism in Medicine

18th-century doctors examining a glowing rock in a laboratory setting.

During the Enlightenment, while medicine was still considered an 'art,' many began emphasizing its foundation in empirical evidence. Observation, rather than ancient theories, became the cornerstone of reliable and useful medical practice. Jurist and physician Jean Verdier advocated for government regulation of medicine, asserting 'the certitude of this science.' The Faculty of Medicine in Paris reminded everyone that 'observation is in general that which is most useful in medicine because it is that which is the most certain'.

The editor of the Journal de médecine, Charles-Augustin Vandermonde, considered observation a key element for medical experts to communicate valuable information to the public. He wrote that 'observation is one of the principal concerns of this journal' and 'each observation becomes a new trophy for medicine'. Failing to note even the smallest details would be 'to betray public trust'. Observation made medicine reliable and worthy of public confidence.

  • Competing Theories: Shook confidence in formal education and fostered insecurity and distrust.
  • Limited Remedies: Knowledge of the human body improved, but it did not translate into reliable remedies.
  • Alternative Practitioners: A wide variety of alternative practitioners and remedies further deepened the uncertainty about the value of formally educated and licensed practitioners.
To set themselves apart, medical journals and pamphlets highlighted the differences between charlatans and licensed practitioners. They characterized charlatans as greedy and deceitful, and physicians as beneficent and skilled. They stressed the dangers of resorting to those whose motives were primarily monetary. The Journal de médecine attacked charlatans and the provincial periodicals in which they sold their remedies. Their goal, it was argued, was simply 'to take money from the public by misleading it'. Physicians, on the other hand, sought 'through the efforts of a generous zeal alone, seek to render themselves useful to the public'.

A Lasting Legacy of Reason

During the Enlightenment in France, both intellectuals and commoners acknowledged that progress in medicine held the key to terrestrial happiness. While medical training and surgical techniques advanced, medicine remained largely ineffective. Yet, medical professionals found legitimacy in debunking medical marvels, challenging preternatural beliefs with their extensive knowledge of the natural order. The tales of debunked medical marvels taught practitioners about the dangers of credulity, elevated medical practitioners to an intellectual level, and promoted medicine as a science grounded in reason and observation. The legacy of these investigations lies in the emphasis on skepticism, the predictability of the natural order, and the utility of medicine when practiced intelligently and professionally.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1093/shm/hky097, Alternate LINK

Title: Medical Marvels And Professional Medicine: Establishing Scientific Authority In Enlightenment France

Subject: History

Journal: Social History of Medicine

Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)

Authors: Angela C Haas

Published: 2018-11-23

Everything You Need To Know

1

During the Enlightenment in France, what motivated physicians to investigate medical marvels?

Elite physicians in Paris investigated medical marvels with a dual purpose. First, the accounts of these investigations served as propaganda, showcasing the skill and knowledge of learned physicians and surgeons to the educated public. Second, these accounts were pedagogical instruments, teaching medical practitioners to be vigilant against deceit and superstition. By exposing hoaxes, medical practitioners displayed their dedication to enlightening readers and improving medical practice.

2

How did the rise of empiricism in medicine during the Enlightenment challenge traditional medical practices?

During the Enlightenment, empiricism emphasized observation over ancient theories as the cornerstone of reliable medical practice. Jurist and physician Jean Verdier advocated for government regulation of medicine, asserting its certainty. The Faculty of Medicine in Paris emphasized that observation was the most useful and certain aspect of medicine. This focus on observation aimed to make medicine more reliable and worthy of public confidence, distinguishing it from less empirical approaches. However, competing theories, limited remedies, and alternative practitioners created insecurity and distrust.

3

In what ways did medical journals and pamphlets differentiate licensed physicians from charlatans during the Enlightenment?

Medical journals and pamphlets highlighted the differences between licensed practitioners and charlatans by characterizing charlatans as greedy and deceitful, while portraying physicians as beneficent and skilled. They emphasized the dangers of seeking remedies from those motivated primarily by money. The Journal de médecine specifically attacked charlatans and the provincial periodicals where they promoted their remedies, arguing their goal was simply to exploit the public for financial gain, contrasting this with the physician's aim to serve the public through 'generous zeal'.

4

What was the lasting legacy of debunking medical marvels during the Enlightenment, and how did it shape modern medical practices?

The legacy of debunking medical marvels during the Enlightenment lies in the emphasis on skepticism, the predictability of the natural order, and the utility of medicine when practiced intelligently and professionally. These investigations elevated medical practitioners intellectually and promoted medicine as a science grounded in reason and observation. This approach reinforced the importance of evidence-based practice, which is foundational in modern medical training and patient care. It set the stage for prioritizing scientific reasoning over superstition and unverified claims in medicine.

5

How did the investigation of cases like Geneviève Martin, who supposedly produced rocks, contribute to the broader understanding and perception of medical science during the Enlightenment?

The investigation of cases such as Geneviève Martin, who supposedly produced rocks, led to public debates that aimed to expose how common people and medical practitioners were tricked by impostors. These investigations provided a platform for physicians and surgeons to showcase their skills and knowledge to the educated public, reinforcing the importance of scientific reasoning in medicine. By publicly debunking such claims, medical experts aimed to enlighten readers, improve the quality of medical practice, and combat superstition, thereby strengthening the authority and credibility of scientifically-grounded medicine.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.