Interconnected hands from BRICS nations support a fragile kidney, symbolizing global healthcare collaboration.

Kidney Care Crisis: Unveiling Global Disparities in Renal Replacement Therapy

"A deep dive into the inequalities of access to dialysis and transplantation in BRICS nations and what it means for global healthcare."


End-stage renal disease (ESRD) poses a significant global public health challenge, particularly in developing nations. The high costs associated with renal replacement therapy (RRT)—including hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation—create substantial barriers to access. This is compounded by the scarcity of resources, inadequate healthcare infrastructure, and a rising prevalence of chronic diseases.

The BRICS countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—represent a unique case study. Despite their growing economic influence, these nations grapple with significant healthcare disparities. While reforms have aimed to improve equity and access, persistent inequalities remain, particularly in the availability and accessibility of RRT.

This article analyzes the multifaceted bioethical dilemmas surrounding access to RRT within the BRICS nations. By examining the disparities in treatment availability, the influence of socioeconomic factors, and the ethical considerations surrounding organ transplantation, we aim to shed light on the urgent need for equitable and sustainable solutions.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

U.S. Dialysis and Transplantation

The USRDS 2025 Annual Data Report states that 22,916 people on dialysis received a kidney transplant in 2024. It reports a transplant rate of 4 per 100 person-years among people on dialysis. The USRDS 2023 report chapter draws on CMS ESRD Medical Evidence Reports, Medicare claims, and the ESRD Quality Reporting System (EQRS) to describe incidence, prevalence, patient characteristics, and treatment modalities.

Hemodialysis Vascular Access

People who require hemodialysis need a means of access to the bloodstream to receive this life-sustaining treatment. The 2019 KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline update reflects accumulated evidence and a more sophisticated guideline-development process compared with the prior 2006 update. A 2024 review emphasizes that selecting, creating, and maintaining arteriovenous access is critical, and that clinicians have a role in protecting access and identifying complications. These sources describe the importance of access planning and complication management but do not quantify particular limitations or compare access types.

From Early Experiments to Hemodialysis

A 2024 Springer chapter traces dialysis history from experiments by Thomas Graham more than two centuries ago to Willem Kolff’s creation of the hemodialysis machine. It describes the history of vascular access as intertwined with advances in hemodialysis technology. A 2024 Wiley chapter surveys the evolution of hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and transplantation, along with challenges kidney-care professionals have had to overcome.

Why is Access to Kidney Treatment Unequal in BRICS Nations?

Interconnected hands from BRICS nations support a fragile kidney, symbolizing global healthcare collaboration.

A study of the inequalities in access to RRT in the BRICS countries reveals significant disparities in treatment availability. These variations stem from several factors, including economic constraints, inadequate healthcare infrastructure, and a complex interplay of bioethical considerations.

Unequal access manifests in several ways:

  • Limited Resources: Developing countries often face a scarcity of resources for healthcare investment, hindering the widespread availability of RRT.
  • Infrastructure Gaps: Inadequate healthcare infrastructure, including a shortage of dialysis centers and trained personnel, further restricts access.
  • Socioeconomic Factors: Poverty, social determinants, and biological vulnerabilities exacerbate the problem, creating a cycle of disadvantage.
  • Lack of Information: A lack of comprehensive data on dialysis and transplantation in some countries, such as India, makes it difficult to assess the true extent of the need and to implement effective interventions.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Recent Work on Hemodialysis Access

The 2025 Hemodialysis Vascular Access Core Curriculum reviews arteriovenous fistulas, arteriovenous grafts, and central venous catheters, as well as access planning. It notes that most patients with kidney failure requiring replacement therapy will need hemodialysis at some point and that reliable functioning vascular access is required. A 2026 review focuses on hemodialysis access in the United States, where the source describes hemodialysis as the primary renal replacement therapy for people with end-stage kidney disease.

Treatment Patterns and Access Complications

A global review reports that dialysis is the predominant kidney replacement therapy in most countries, although transplantation is preferred for eligible patients. A separate 2023 study examines trends in vascular-access-related complications among hospitalized patients with end-stage kidney disease receiving hemodialysis, including the impact of race. The available source summaries do not provide specific complication rates or country-by-country comparisons.

These factors contribute to a situation where many individuals in BRICS countries who require RRT are unable to receive it, leading to preventable morbidity and mortality.

What Can Be Done to Improve Access to Kidney Care?

Addressing the disparities in access to RRT requires a multifaceted approach. This includes expanding conservative treatment options, promoting local production of essential inputs, exploring non-governmental funding sources, and implementing cost-containment strategies. Furthermore, promoting deceased donor programs and fostering South-South cooperation can play a crucial role in improving access and equity. By embracing a bioethical vision that prioritizes solidarity and international cooperation, BRICS nations can work together to bridge the gap and ensure that all individuals have access to life-saving renal replacement therapy.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Planning Access Through Shared Decisions

Shared decision-making in vascular-access practice is presented as an important part of care planning for people with advanced kidney disease receiving hemodialysis. The source groups access routes into arteriovenous access—fistulas and grafts—and central venous catheters. It reports that observational studies have regarded arteriovenous fistulas as the optimal access based on outcomes. The expert-witness sources describe access failure, fistula complications, standards of care, and facility protocols as subjects requiring specialized nephrology assessment, but do not provide clinical outcome data.

Funding oversight and treatment coverage across income groups

  • 28%, 15%, 8% of participating countriesAmong 65 participating lower- and lower-middle-income countries, government-funded care free at the point of delivery covered hemodialysis in 28%, peritoneal dialysis in 15%, and kidney transplantation in 8%.[1]
  • 78%; 17% of countriesPublic funding for kidney replacement therapy was reported in 78% of high-income countries; private and out-of-pocket funding was most prevalent in low-income countries, at 17%.[2]

What funding and staffing figures reveal

The figures describe different dimensions of health-system support: whether oversight exists, whether treatment is publicly funded, and how often care is free at the point of delivery. They show that reported financing arrangements vary by income group and treatment, but do not establish what any individual patient can obtain.[1] [2]

The reported nephrologist workforce for pediatric kidney care was far smaller than the adult workforce. This indicates a staffing disparity between age groups, but the figures alone do not show its effects on care or outcomes.[3]

How global estimates depend on coverage and measurement

A global kidney-disease burden analysis notes that morbidity and mortality data are scarce or absent in many countries, even though such information is needed for health-system planning. This limits how completely country-level need can be assessed.[4]

The assessment of kidney-care capacity combined a literature and database review with a cross-sectional online survey of opinion leaders. The resulting picture therefore draws on both published records and survey responses.[3]

The kidney-transplant capacity analysis excluded countries lacking a kidney disease and transplant registry, data in the Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation, or identifiable publications reporting the assessed transplant measures. Its regional estimates therefore do not cover every country.[5]

A global report states that late presentation with advanced kidney disease or acute kidney injury in lower-income countries can necessitate immediate dialysis, leaving no time for arteriovenous fistula or graft creation or maturation. This describes a context for dialysis access, not a comparative rate across countries.[6]

What the global comparisons leave unresolved

  • How would kidney-disease burden estimates change if morbidity and mortality information were more complete across countries? The cited analysis identifies gaps in those data but does not quantify their effect on estimates.[4]
  • How much do exclusions from transplant-capacity desk research alter the regional picture? The excluded countries are described, but the effect of their absence is not measured.[5]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is renal replacement therapy, and why is it crucial?

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) presents a major global health problem, especially in developing countries. The high costs of renal replacement therapy (RRT), encompassing hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation, create significant hurdles to receiving care. Factors such as scarce resources, insufficient healthcare infrastructure, and a rising prevalence of chronic diseases further complicate this issue. The implications are severe, leading to preventable illness and death for those who cannot access treatment.

2

What are the key challenges in accessing kidney treatment in BRICS countries?

The BRICS countries, namely Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, face considerable healthcare inequalities despite their growing economic influence. While efforts have been made to improve equity and access, disparities persist, particularly concerning the availability and accessibility of renal replacement therapy (RRT). This means that even in nations with increasing economic strength, a significant portion of the population may not have equal opportunities to receive life-saving kidney treatments due to systemic issues within their healthcare systems.

3

Why is access to kidney treatment unequal in BRICS nations?

Several factors contribute to unequal access to kidney treatment within the BRICS nations. Limited resources for healthcare investment hinder the widespread availability of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Inadequate healthcare infrastructure, including a lack of dialysis centers and trained personnel, restricts access further. Socioeconomic factors, such as poverty, and biological vulnerabilities exacerbate the problem, creating a cycle of disadvantage. Moreover, a lack of comprehensive data on dialysis and transplantation in some countries makes it difficult to assess the need and implement effective interventions. These combined factors lead to situations where many individuals who require RRT are unable to receive it.

4

What actions can be taken to address disparities in kidney care access?

Several strategies can improve access to renal replacement therapy (RRT). Expanding conservative treatment options can provide alternatives. Promoting local production of essential inputs can reduce costs and improve availability. Exploring non-governmental funding sources can supplement government funding. Implementing cost-containment strategies can make RRT more affordable. Furthermore, promoting deceased donor programs and fostering South-South cooperation can enhance access and equity. By embracing a bioethical vision that prioritizes solidarity and international cooperation, the BRICS nations can work together to bridge the gap and ensure that all individuals have access to life-saving renal replacement therapy.

5

Why is it important to understand healthcare inequalities in the BRICS nations?

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) encompasses various treatments for kidney failure, including hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation. Hemodialysis involves filtering the blood using a machine. Peritoneal dialysis uses the lining of the abdomen to filter blood. Kidney transplantation replaces the diseased kidney with a healthy one. The choice of RRT depends on factors such as the patient's health, access to resources, and personal preferences. The ability to access these therapies is critical for individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) to survive and maintain a good quality of life.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.