Ammonia clouds forming a question mark over a farm, symbolizing emission uncertainty.

Is Your Fertilizer Doing More Harm Than Good? The Hidden Truth About Ammonia Emissions

"Uncover how outdated European emission inventories may be overestimating ammonia release, impacting our environment and agricultural practices."


For years, European agricultural policies have been guided by a critical understanding: that ammonia (NH3) emissions from fertilizers significantly contribute to environmental harm. Emission inventories, such as those outlined in the EMEP/EEA guidebook, have set the standard, dictating that a large percentage of applied nitrogen fertilizer escapes into the atmosphere as ammonia. But what if these guiding principles are based on overestimated data?

A recent review has compiled over 350 measurements of ammonia emission factors (EFs) from 1991 to 2011, challenging the long-held assumptions about field-applied slurry. The findings suggest that the actual ammonia emissions may be substantially lower than what current inventories indicate, potentially reshaping how we approach agricultural sustainability and environmental protection.

This article will explore the intriguing discrepancies uncovered by this review, examining the methods used to measure ammonia emissions and discussing the implications for European emission inventories. It’s time to question the status quo and consider whether our efforts to minimize agricultural pollution are on the right track.

The Great Emission Overestimation?

Ammonia clouds forming a question mark over a farm, symbolizing emission uncertainty.

The EMEP/EEA guidebook, a key resource for agricultural emission inventories, reports that an average of 55% of the total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) content from cattle slurry and 35% from pig slurry is lost through volatilization. These figures are used across Europe to inform policies and practices, but they may not reflect the reality of modern agriculture.

The review of over 350 measurements reveals a significant shift in slurry application techniques over the years. In the early period, when many of the reference EFs were established, splash plate spreading was the standard method. However, more recent techniques, such as trailing hose, trailing shoes, and slurry injection, have become increasingly common. These newer methods are designed to reduce ammonia emissions, suggesting that the older, higher EFs may no longer be accurate.
To understand the significance of this potential overestimation, consider these factors:
  • Evolving Agricultural Practices: Modern techniques aim to minimize emissions, making older data less relevant.
  • Variations in Measurement Techniques: Different methods yield varying results, complicating the picture.
  • Impact on Environmental Policies: Overestimated emissions could lead to inefficient or misdirected environmental policies.
The review classified available measurements according to flux measurement technique, measurement plot size, and year of measurement. Medium-size plots, typically circles with a 20 to 50-meter radius, yielded the highest EFs, while field-scale measurements showed substantially lower EFs. This discrepancy calls for a reevaluation of measurement approaches and a validation of newer, more accurate inputs for emission inventories. The question is no longer just about the quantity of emissions, but about the methods we use to measure them.

Time for a Change?

The review underscores the urgent need for new measurement series to validate various measurement approaches and derive revised inputs for emission inventories. By refining our understanding of ammonia emissions, we can ensure that agricultural practices and environmental policies are based on accurate data. This, in turn, will lead to more effective strategies for reducing agricultural pollution and promoting a sustainable future.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.