Outdated car suspension test versus modern car

Is Your Car Suspension Lying to You? The Truth About EUSAMA Testing

Kai Mendoza in Tech & Innovation December 2025 • 4 min read.

"Uncover why standard car suspension tests might be giving you false readings and how new research is changing the game for accurate diagnostics."

For decades, the EUSAMA diagnostic methodology has been a cornerstone of car safety inspections, helping to identify worn or damaged suspensions. The test, designed to measure a vehicle's wheel adhesion to a vibrating platform, provides a seemingly straightforward assessment of suspension performance. However, a growing number of car owners and technicians are questioning its accuracy, with modern vehicles often failing the test despite being in good condition.

This discrepancy stems from the fact that the EUSAMA methodology, developed in the 1970s, hasn't kept pace with the evolution of car design and road infrastructure. Today's vehicles often feature stiffer tires and suspensions, optimized for smoother roads than those of the past. This mismatch can lead to false-negative results, where a perfectly healthy suspension appears deficient under the EUSAMA test.

Fortunately, researchers are stepping in to reinvent the EUSAMA methodology for the 21st century. By using advanced mathematical models and simulations, they're pinpointing the causes of these inaccurate readings and developing new approaches to ensure reliable suspension diagnostics.

The EUSAMA Test: A Good Idea Gone Wrong?

Outdated car suspension test versus modern car

The core principle behind the EUSAMA test is simple: measure how well a car's wheels maintain contact with a vibrating platform. This simulates the bumps and undulations of a typical road surface. The test calculates a 'relative downforce' based on the minimum force exerted by the wheel on the platform during oscillation. A low score indicates poor wheel adhesion, suggesting a problem with the suspension system.

However, several factors can throw off this seemingly straightforward measurement. Modern car design trends, aimed at improving fuel efficiency and handling, often involve:

Stiffer Tires: Designed for low rolling resistance, these tires transmit more of the road's vibrations directly to the suspension.
Lower Axle Load: Especially on non-driven axles, reduced weight means less force keeping the wheels planted.
Non-Linear Shock Absorbers: These advanced dampers react differently to various road conditions, potentially causing unexpected results in the EUSAMA test.
Aggressive Excitation Stroke: The test's vibration intensity might be too high for modern, well-tuned suspensions.

These factors can create a perfect storm, leading to a false-negative result, which can cause unneeded repairs.

A New Era for Suspension Diagnostics

The road to accurate and reliable suspension testing is paved with innovative solutions. By refining the EUSAMA methodology, accounting for modern vehicle designs, and incorporating intelligent software adjustments, we can ensure that car safety inspections are based on precise data. These upgrades promises safer roads for everyone.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

What is the EUSAMA diagnostic methodology and what is it used for in car safety inspections?

The EUSAMA diagnostic methodology is a test designed to evaluate a vehicle's suspension performance by measuring wheel adhesion to a vibrating platform. It's been a standard tool in car safety inspections for decades, aiming to identify worn or damaged suspensions by calculating a 'relative downforce.' A lower score implies poor wheel adhesion, which suggests there might be a problem with the suspension system. However, the test's accuracy has been questioned with modern vehicles.

Why are some modern cars failing EUSAMA suspension tests even when they are in good condition?

Modern cars are sometimes failing the EUSAMA test because the methodology, developed in the 1970s, hasn't adapted to modern vehicle designs and road infrastructure. Factors such as stiffer tires, lower axle load, non-linear shock absorbers, and aggressive excitation strokes contribute to inaccurate readings. These elements can lead to false-negative results, where a healthy suspension appears deficient under the EUSAMA test, resulting in unnecessary repairs.

What specific design features of modern cars can cause inaccuracies in EUSAMA testing?

Several design features in modern cars contribute to inaccuracies in the EUSAMA test. Stiffer tires, designed for low rolling resistance, transmit more road vibrations directly to the suspension. Lower axle loads, especially on non-driven axles, reduce the force keeping wheels planted. Non-linear shock absorbers react differently to various road conditions. Finally, an aggressive excitation stroke during testing may be too intense for modern, well-tuned suspensions, all of which can lead to false-negative results.

How are researchers improving the EUSAMA methodology to ensure more accurate suspension diagnostics for modern vehicles?

Researchers are refining the EUSAMA methodology using advanced mathematical models and simulations to pinpoint the causes of inaccurate readings. By accounting for modern vehicle designs and incorporating intelligent software adjustments, they are developing new approaches to ensure more reliable suspension diagnostics. These upgrades aim to base car safety inspections on more precise data, promising safer roads.

What are the implications of inaccurate EUSAMA testing results, and why is it important to refine the methodology?

Inaccurate EUSAMA testing can lead to unnecessary repairs and costs for car owners due to false-negative results. More broadly, it undermines the reliability of car safety inspections, potentially compromising safety on the roads. Refining the EUSAMA methodology ensures that assessments are based on precise data reflecting modern vehicle designs and road conditions. This accuracy is crucial for properly identifying actual suspension issues, maintaining vehicle safety standards, and avoiding unwarranted expenses for vehicle owners.