Digital scale balancing revenue and privacy.

Is User Tracking Worth the Cost? What Publishers Need to Know in 2024

Author's portrait.
Samir D’Costa in Business & Economy December 2025 • 5 min read.

"Explore the shifting landscape of online advertising, where user privacy regulations and technology impact publisher revenues. Learn strategies to adapt and thrive in this new era."


The internet is in the midst of a significant transformation. For years, online publishers have relied on tracking user data to deliver targeted advertising and boost their revenues. However, rising concerns about privacy have led to stricter regulations and technological changes that are rapidly reshaping the digital landscape. As we move further into 2024, understanding the economic implications of these shifts is more critical than ever for publishers.

Regulators and tech companies are increasingly prioritizing user privacy. Measures like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe and Apple's App Tracking Transparency (ATT) framework have put limits on how user data can be collected and used. These changes directly impact publishers, who depend on selling ad space to support their content creation.

This article breaks down the core economic impact of this shifting landscape, offering practical advice for publishers seeking to adapt and maintain their revenue streams. We'll explore the findings of recent studies, and provide strategies to help publishers navigate the challenges of a privacy-focused internet.

The Economic Reality: How User Tracking Affects Publisher Revenue

Digital scale balancing revenue and privacy.

The ability to track users online has a direct impact on the prices publishers can charge for their ad space. User tracking allows advertisers to target specific demographics, interests, and behaviors, which in turn increases the value they place on those ad impressions. However, when user tracking is limited or unavailable, advertisers are often willing to pay less, resulting in decreased revenue for publishers. Recent studies show that there is an average price decrease of 18%-23% when user tracking is unavailable. This makes the cost of ensuring user privacy significant for online publishers.

Not all publishers are affected equally. Those offering content on sports, cars, lifestyle, shopping, news, and information experience the most significant revenue drops. Smaller publishers, niche publishers and premium publishers with high-quality content and reputations are likely to be less affected. In contrast, non-premium publishers with user-generated content, broad news publishers, and larger publishers suffer more. The degree to which different publishers suffer losses has a direct relation to their ability to adapt and substitute lost user tracking with first-party data, as well as the strength of their brand and content.

  • Data Collection Matters: Obtaining the user ID generates the highest value for publishers, while gathering a user's browsing history generates a lower value.
  • Privacy and Perception: User’s browsing history is perceived as intrusive, and it generates only a small value for publishers.
  • Adaptation is Key: Publishers that evolve and take efforts to protect user’s privacy can substantially benefit.
The type of data collected and how it is used also matters significantly. Studies show that the availability of a user ID itself generates the most value for publishers. That is, simply knowing a unique identifier for a user is highly beneficial. In contrast, collecting a user’s browsing history, which many perceive as intrusive, generates far less value for publishers. This suggests that more transparent, less invasive data collection methods could provide a better balance between user privacy and publisher revenue.

Strategies for the Future: Balancing Privacy and Profit

While the challenges are significant, publishers are not without options. Those that already rely less on user tracking include premium publishers, thematically narrow publishers, and smaller publishers. One viable strategy is for publishers to narrow their content on a thematic basis and increase contextual targeting capabilities. Granted, they should proceed with caution, considering that contextual targeting can violate users’ privacy, too. Advertisers also tend to prefer large, obtrusive ad formats when no user tracking is available, providing a format strategy. By embracing new approaches, publishers can forge a path toward a sustainable future that respects user privacy while supporting a vibrant and diverse online content ecosystem.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

How does user tracking affect publisher revenue?

User tracking directly influences the prices publishers can charge for ad space. When user tracking is available, advertisers can target specific demographics and interests, increasing the value of ad impressions. However, when user tracking is limited, advertisers are willing to pay less, resulting in decreased revenue for publishers. Studies indicate an average price decrease of 18%-23% when user tracking is unavailable. This underscores the significant economic impact of user privacy measures on online publishers' revenue streams.

2

What are the key regulations and technologies impacting user tracking?

Several regulations and technologies are reshaping the digital landscape. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe and Apple's App Tracking Transparency (ATT) framework are prominent examples. These measures place limitations on how user data can be collected and used, directly affecting publishers who rely on ad revenue. These changes are driven by the growing focus on user privacy and have significant implications for the online advertising ecosystem.

3

Which types of publishers are most and least affected by the limitations on user tracking?

Not all publishers are equally affected. Those offering content on sports, cars, lifestyle, shopping, news, and information typically experience more significant revenue drops due to their reliance on targeted advertising. Smaller, niche, and premium publishers with high-quality content and strong reputations are likely to be less affected. In contrast, non-premium publishers with user-generated content, broad news publishers, and larger publishers often suffer greater losses. The ability to adapt and substitute lost user tracking with first-party data and brand strength influences the extent of the impact.

4

What specific data types are most and least valuable for publishers in terms of user tracking?

The availability of a user ID generates the most value for publishers, as it provides a unique identifier for targeting. Collecting a user’s browsing history generates far less value because it is often perceived as intrusive. This implies that focusing on less invasive, more transparent data collection methods can help publishers balance user privacy and revenue generation. Strategies that prioritize obtaining the user ID while minimizing the collection of browsing history can be more effective.

5

What strategies can publishers implement to balance user privacy and maintain revenue?

Publishers can implement several strategies. One viable approach is to narrow their content on a thematic basis and enhance contextual targeting capabilities. This allows for more relevant ad placement without relying heavily on user tracking. Publishers can also explore different ad formats. By embracing new approaches, publishers can create a sustainable future that respects user privacy while supporting a diverse online content ecosystem. This could involve leveraging first-party data, focusing on premium content, and building strong brand reputations to mitigate the effects of reduced user tracking.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.