Hands holding earth symbolizing carbon sequestration efforts.

Is Soil Carbon Sequestration a Climate Change Mirage? The Truth About '4 per Mille'

Author's portrait.
Lena Kashyap in Climate & Environment December 2025 • 4 min read.

"Despite its intuitive appeal, the ambitious '4 per Mille' initiative faces significant hurdles in becoming a viable climate mitigation strategy."


The concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is a pressing global concern. While reducing fossil fuel emissions is paramount, scientists are also exploring alternative strategies, such as carbon sequestration, to mitigate climate change. The idea of capturing atmospheric carbon dioxide and storing it as organic carbon in the biosphere, particularly in soil, has gained considerable attention.

For nearly two decades, soil scientists have investigated the potential of soil organic matter to act as a carbon sink. The underlying principle is straightforward: millennia of agricultural practices have depleted global soil carbon reserves. It is estimated that cultivated agriculture has reduced global soil carbon by 116 Gt, equivalent to more than a decade of current industrial emissions. Could modified agricultural techniques restore this carbon to domesticated soils, thereby providing a significant tool for climate change mitigation?

The '4 per Mille' initiative, launched at the 21st Conference of the Parties in Paris and endorsed by over 100 nations, embodies this concept. The initiative proposes increasing soil carbon stocks by 0.4% per year as a means of halting the annual rise in atmospheric CO2. But despite its widespread support, the feasibility of this initiative is increasingly debated by climate scientists.

The Hurdles in Harnessing Soil as a Major Carbon Sink

Hands holding earth symbolizing carbon sequestration efforts.

Despite its rational premise, the concept of soil carbon sequestration as a major climate change solution faces substantial obstacles. These challenges span cultural, economic, and physical domains, casting doubt on the widespread implementation and effectiveness of such strategies.

A significant challenge lies in the divide between researchers and the farming community. Farmers, often characterized by a conservative value system, prioritize independence and may view environmental initiatives with suspicion. This skepticism is compounded by concerns about government intervention and a perceived lack of understanding from non-farmer experts regarding the economic and regulatory realities of agriculture.

  • Cultural Barriers: Distrust of external experts and resistance to imposed regulations hinder the adoption of new practices.
  • Economic Disincentives: Renters, who manage a significant portion of US farmland, may lack the financial motivation to invest in long-term conservation efforts. Additionally, complex land ownership patterns and absentee owners complicate the implementation of sustainable practices.
  • Program Limitations: Current US government programs aimed at promoting soil health have limited reach, with only a small percentage of croplands receiving funding. Furthermore, bureaucratic hurdles and restrictions based on income further impede participation.
Beyond socioeconomic factors, inherent physical limitations constrain the potential of soil carbon sequestration. Climate change itself can undermine these efforts. Rising temperatures accelerate the decomposition of organic matter in soil, releasing stored carbon back into the atmosphere. This feedback loop could offset the benefits of sequestration efforts, reducing their overall impact.

Refocusing on Climate Resilience: Adapting Soils to a Changing World

While soil carbon sequestration may not be the silver bullet for climate change, healthy soils are undeniably crucial for adapting to its impacts. Rather than prioritizing carbon sequestration as the primary goal, efforts should focus on enhancing soil health to improve water management, reduce erosion, and ensure food security. By framing soil management as a means of 'weather-proofing' agriculture, researchers and policymakers can better engage with farmers and promote practices that enhance the resilience of both soils and communities in the face of a changing climate.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is the '4 per Mille' initiative and what is its primary goal?

The '4 per Mille' initiative, launched at the 21st Conference of the Parties in Paris, is a climate mitigation strategy endorsed by over 100 nations. Its primary goal is to increase soil carbon stocks by 0.4% annually to counteract the yearly increase in atmospheric CO2. This involves capturing atmospheric carbon dioxide and storing it as organic carbon in the soil to combat climate change.

2

What are the key barriers that hinder the implementation of the '4 per Mille' initiative?

The '4 per Mille' initiative faces significant challenges across cultural, economic, and physical domains. Cultural barriers include distrust from the farming community towards external experts and skepticism of government regulations. Economic disincentives arise from the structure of land ownership, such as renters lacking motivation for long-term conservation efforts, and the limitations of current government programs. Physical limitations, particularly the impact of rising temperatures on the decomposition of organic matter, further complicate the process.

3

How does climate change itself impact soil carbon sequestration efforts?

Climate change poses a direct threat to soil carbon sequestration efforts. Rising temperatures accelerate the decomposition of organic matter in the soil. This process releases stored carbon back into the atmosphere, potentially negating the benefits of sequestration initiatives. This feedback loop underscores the complex interplay between climate change and the effectiveness of such strategies.

4

Why is there a divide between researchers and the farming community concerning soil carbon sequestration?

A significant challenge lies in the disconnect between researchers and the farming community. Farmers, often holding conservative values, may be wary of external experts and view environmental initiatives with suspicion. This skepticism is compounded by concerns about government intervention and a perceived lack of understanding from non-farmer experts regarding the economic and regulatory realities of agriculture. These cultural barriers can greatly hinder the adoption of new practices.

5

Instead of focusing on carbon sequestration, what alternative approach is suggested to address climate change impacts on soil?

The article suggests shifting the focus from soil carbon sequestration as the primary goal to enhancing soil health for climate resilience. This approach prioritizes improving water management, reducing erosion, and ensuring food security. By framing soil management as a means of 'weather-proofing' agriculture, researchers and policymakers can better engage with farmers and promote practices that enhance the resilience of both soils and communities in the face of a changing climate, thereby adapting to the impacts rather than solely mitigating them through carbon sequestration.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.