Child surrounded by floating junk food while watching TV.

Is Industry Self-Regulation Protecting Our Kids? Unhealthy Food Ads on TV

"A critical look at the effectiveness of industry self-regulation in curbing unhealthy food advertising to Australian children and its impact on their health."


Globally, numerous reputable scientific organizations have reached a consensus: food marketing significantly shapes children's dietary preferences, influencing both what they want to eat and what they ask their parents to buy. Ultimately, these marketing efforts affect children's overall consumption habits. Recognizing this impact, the National Preventative Health Taskforce recommended targeting food marketing aimed at children as a crucial component of Australia's broader strategy to combat overweight and obesity.

In 2009, industry groups introduced two voluntary initiatives, the Responsible Children's Marketing Initiative (RCMI) and the Quick Service Restaurant Industry Initiative for Responsible Advertising and Marketing to Children, in an attempt to demonstrate their dedication to responsible food marketing to children. Companies that signed onto these initiatives pledged to avoid advertising food and beverage products to children unless those products met specific standards for healthy dietary choices (as defined by scientific or governmental guidelines). Further, the advertising messages were required to promote a healthy lifestyle, including good eating habits and regular physical activity.

To better understand the real-world effects of these initiatives on children’s exposure to television advertising for unhealthy foods, we recently reviewed several Australian studies. This systematic review was specifically commissioned by the Australian National Preventive Health Agency to provide an evidence-based assessment of the impact of self-regulation on children's food advertising.

Defining 'Advertising to Children': The Challenge

Child surrounded by floating junk food while watching TV.

One of the primary challenges in assessing the effectiveness of advertising regulations is defining what constitutes “advertising to children.” Current regulations often focus on program classifications, such as limiting advertising during shows specifically classified as “C” (for children). However, this approach overlooks the viewing habits of children, who often watch television during broader evening hours when various programs are broadcast.

Research indicates that Australian children are exposed to between 0.7 and 6.5 unhealthy food advertisements per hour during these broader viewing times. While this might seem like a small number, the cumulative effect is significant. Considering that Australian children watch approximately 2 hours of television daily, their annual exposure to unhealthy food advertisements could range from 511 to 4700, and these figures only account for television advertising, excluding other sources.

  • The food, advertising, and media industries have significant financial stakes in food advertising.
  • Signatories may advertise unhealthy foods on television more than non-signatories.
  • In November 2011, signatories to the RCMI advertised unhealthy foods at double the rate of non-signatories (0.36 versus 0.17 per hour) at times when children are watching television.
  • Industry groups may argue that the initiatives do not apply in this case because the data do not relate to advertising that specifically targets children or is shown during programs that are developed for children.
This raises a critical distinction: public health advocates are concerned with reducing children's overall exposure to unhealthy food advertisements, regardless of whether those ads are specifically targeted at children. These findings are concerning because they undermine confidence in the effectiveness of these self-regulatory initiatives for a couple of reasons. First, non-signatories to the initiatives are not obligated to adhere to any restrictions on unhealthy food advertising to children, allowing them to continue marketing freely. Second, given that signatories advertise at a higher rate than non-signatories during peak children's viewing times, it appears the initiatives are not effectively fulfilling their intended role as a socially responsible approach to food marketing to children.

Moving Towards a Healthier Food Environment

Advertising is just one component of our broader “food environment.” Considering the significant burden of disease linked to poor dietary habits, it's crucial to create an environment that supports individuals in making healthier food choices. Community surveys in South Australia reveal that 80%-90% of adults support government regulation of food marketing during children's television viewing times. Stronger regulation is also advocated by health and medical organizations. Despite the introduction of industry initiatives and widespread community support for regulation, Australian children continue to be exposed to advertising of unhealthy foods on television.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.5694/mja13.10562, Alternate LINK

Title: The Impact Of Industry Self‐Regulation On Television Marketing Of Unhealthy Food And Beverages To Australian Children

Subject: General Medicine

Journal: Medical Journal of Australia

Publisher: AMPCo

Authors: Lisa G Smithers, Tracy L Merlin, John W Lynch

Published: 2013-08-01

Everything You Need To Know

1

What are the primary industry self-regulatory initiatives mentioned, and what are their goals?

The two main voluntary initiatives are the Responsible Children's Marketing Initiative (RCMI) and the Quick Service Restaurant Industry Initiative for Responsible Advertising and Marketing to Children. The goals of these initiatives were to demonstrate a commitment to responsible food marketing, pledging to avoid advertising food and beverage products to children unless those products met specific standards for healthy dietary choices and to promote a healthy lifestyle.

2

How is 'advertising to children' defined, and what are the implications of this definition?

Defining 'advertising to children' is a key challenge. Current regulations often rely on program classifications, such as limiting advertising during 'C' classified shows. However, this approach doesn't fully capture children's viewing habits, who often watch television during broader evening hours. This is significant because it impacts the overall exposure to unhealthy food advertisements. Public health advocates are concerned with reducing children's overall exposure, irrespective of targeted advertising.

3

What does the data reveal about the effectiveness of the RCMI and other initiatives?

Studies show that children are exposed to a significant number of unhealthy food advertisements during television viewing. Moreover, research indicates that signatories to the RCMI advertised unhealthy foods at a higher rate than non-signatories during peak children's viewing times. This suggests that the initiatives are not effectively fulfilling their intended role as a socially responsible approach to food marketing to children, and that the initiatives might have limited impact.

4

What is the impact of unhealthy food advertising on children, and why is it a concern?

Food marketing significantly shapes children's dietary preferences, influencing what they want to eat and what they ask their parents to buy. This, in turn, affects children's overall consumption habits. The concern arises because these marketing efforts contribute to the growing problem of childhood overweight and obesity. Scientific organizations have reached a consensus on the negative impact of marketing on children's health.

5

What are some key findings regarding the exposure of children to unhealthy food advertisements, and what is the cumulative effect?

Australian children are exposed to a significant number of unhealthy food advertisements per hour during viewing times. The cumulative effect is significant because, considering that children watch approximately 2 hours of television daily, their annual exposure could range from hundreds to thousands of advertisements. This only accounts for television advertising, excluding other sources, emphasizing the need for effective regulation and a healthier food environment.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.