Personalized medicine approach for COPD treatment

ICS in COPD: Are We Finally Ready to Tailor Treatment?

"New insights suggest personalized approaches to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use in COPD could improve outcomes and minimize risks."


For over half a century, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have been a mainstay in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). With decades of research and numerous large-scale trials involving over 40,000 patients, the role of ICS in COPD treatment has been a subject of ongoing debate. While ICS can reduce the risk of exacerbations, their benefits are modest, and they carry potential risks, most notably an increased risk of pneumonia.

The combination of ICS with a long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) has shown promise in improving symptoms and reducing exacerbations compared to either drug alone. However, questions remain about whether this combination is superior to long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) alone or in combination with LABA (i.e., LABA/LAMA). Current Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines offer various options for symptomatic COPD patients with frequent exacerbations, leaving clinicians to navigate choices like LAMA, LABA/LAMA, ICS/LABA, or even ICS/LABA/LAMA combinations.

This ambiguity often leads to therapeutic decisions based on personal preference or habit rather than solid evidence. Experts have criticized this approach, calling for a shift towards "precision medicine" in COPD management. Now, emerging research is shedding light on how to target ICS therapy to the right patients at the right time, potentially optimizing benefits while minimizing harm.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

COPD and Airflow Limitation

COPD is a group of diseases that causes airflow blockage and breathing-related problems, with emphysema and chronic bronchitis identified as the most common types. The CDC reports that smoking is the main cause of COPD, while the Mayo Clinic describes lung damage, airway inflammation, and swelling that limit airflow into and out of the lungs. Cleveland Clinic characterizes the resulting lung and airway damage as irreversible, highlighting a fundamental limitation of treatment: management addresses obstruction and symptoms but cannot simply reverse the underlying damage.

The Origins of ICS in COPD

Inhaled corticosteroids, or ICS, were first discovered 50 years ago, according to the review “Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: the final verdict is…”. The same source reports that ICS are now the most widely used controller medication in the world for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This history helps explain why ICS became central to discussions about COPD treatment, even as their role continues to be evaluated.

Who Benefits Most from ICS in COPD? Asthma History and Eosinophil Counts

Personalized medicine approach for COPD treatment

Recent studies highlighted in the European Respiratory Journal (ERJ) suggest that ICS should primarily be prescribed to COPD patients with a history of asthma or features indicative of asthma-COPD overlap. As noted by Suissa and Ariel, the inclusion or exclusion of asthma-COPD overlap patients in clinical trials may explain inconsistencies in the outcomes of ICS-containing therapies. Trials like IMPACT and TRIBUTE, which included patients with a prior history of asthma, demonstrated reduced exacerbation rates with ICS-containing combinations.

Conversely, the FLAME trial, which excluded patients with asthmatic features, found that LABA/LAMA therapy was associated with lower exacerbation rates compared to ICS/LABA. Furthermore, an analysis by Suissa and Ariel revealed a transient surge in exacerbation rates in the ICS-free arms of these trials during the first month after ICS withdrawal. This observation suggests that abrupt ICS discontinuation without proper supplementation may lead to exacerbations.

  • Asthma-COPD Overlap: Patients with features of both asthma and COPD tend to respond well to ICS.
  • Eosinophil Count: Individuals with higher eosinophil counts (≥300 cells per μL) are more likely to benefit from ICS.
  • Withdrawal Considerations: Abruptly stopping ICS can lead to a temporary increase in exacerbations.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Asthma Characteristics and ICS Use

A study of patients in a Dutch well-established asthma/COPD service for primary care examines the prevalence of asthma characteristics in people with COPD. Its summary states that international guidelines recommend prescribing ICS to COPD patients who comply with one of three specified patient characteristics. The available source material does not identify those three characteristics, so the finding supports a criteria-based approach without establishing which individual features should guide treatment.

While ICS can increase the risk of pneumonia, Cazzola et al. addressed the balance between the benefits of ICS for exacerbation prevention and the potential harm of pneumonia. Using the SUCRA method, they found that LABA/LAMA combination was generally favored over ICS/LABA/LAMA and LABA or LAMA alone. However, the effects of ICS therapy are modified by peripheral blood eosinophil count. Patients with blood eosinophil counts of ≥300 cells per µL are much more likely to be responsive to ICS-based therapy than those with lower eosinophil counts.

Personalizing COPD Treatment: A Path Forward

While these findings offer valuable insights, many questions regarding the role of ICS in COPD management remain. Future studies should rigorously test whether newer-generation ICS-based therapies, delivered via ultrafine devices, may prolong survival, particularly in patients with comorbidities. Additionally, the effects of ICS-based therapy on hospitalizations, a major driver of direct costs for COPD care, warrant further investigation. As research progresses, a deeper understanding of COPD pathogenesis and the identification of novel therapeutic targets will pave the way for precision medicine approaches that improve outcomes and quality of life for millions affected by this chronic respiratory condition.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

A Broader View of COPD

The COPD Foundation describes COPD as including lung conditions such as emphysema and chronic bronchitis. It notes that COPD can cause shortness of breath, fatigue, and a persistent cough, and is often linked to lung irritants such as smoke and pollution. The foundation also reports that COPD is sometimes genetic, pointing toward a future outlook that must account for varied causes and patient experiences rather than treating the condition as uniform.

The source review at a glance

PopulationPatients with COPD[1]
Sample size>40 000[1]
Duration50 years[1]
Times cited21[1]

How later evidence qualifies the biomarker picture

A later meta-analysis found lower exacerbation risk with ICS-containing treatment than with non-ICS, withdrawal, or placebo treatments among patients with elevated eosinophils; this supports a response pattern, not a universal effect.[2]

In a withdrawal analysis, the excess exacerbation rate with ICS withdrawal was greater at successively higher eosinophil percentage thresholds, adding context to the role of counts when treatment is stopped.[3]

A modeled comparison in FLAME estimated higher annual pneumonia risk with LABA/ICS than LABA/LAMA for participants with an eosinophil count off ICS of 100 cells per μL, illustrating that exacerbation response is not the only outcome relevant to comparisons.[4]

What a follow-up would need to establish

  • How well do asthma characteristics identify patients likely to benefit when considered alongside eosinophil counts?[1] [5]
  • Would randomized treatment comparisons in real-world COPD populations clarify how exacerbation history and eosinophil levels relate to outcomes?[6]

Terms used in this evidence

Precision medicine
A personalized approach using individual clinical and biological information to identify patients more likely to benefit while minimizing harm.[7]
Intraclass correlation coefficient
A measure of how similar repeated individual measurements are to each other.[8]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1183/13993003.01940-2018, Alternate LINK

Title: Inhaled Corticosteroids In Copd: The Final Verdict Is…

Subject: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Journal: European Respiratory Journal

Publisher: European Respiratory Society (ERS)

Authors: Janice M. Leung, Don D. Sin

Published: 2018-12-01

Everything You Need To Know

1

What are inhaled corticosteroids and what role do they play in COPD treatment?

Inhaled corticosteroids, or ICS, are medications used in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or COPD, to reduce the risk of exacerbations. While they have been a mainstay treatment for over half a century, their benefits are modest, and they carry potential risks, most notably an increased risk of pneumonia. ICS are often combined with a long-acting β2-agonist, known as LABA, to improve symptoms and reduce exacerbations.

2

What is the significance of combining ICS with LABA in COPD management?

The combination of an inhaled corticosteroid, or ICS, with a long-acting β2-agonist, known as LABA, aims to improve symptoms and reduce exacerbations in COPD patients. This combination is significant because it addresses both bronchodilation (through LABA) and inflammation (through ICS). However, it's essential to consider whether this combination is superior to other treatments, such as long-acting muscarinic antagonists, or LAMA, alone or in combination with LABA, because of the side effects from the ICS.

3

Which COPD patients are most likely to benefit from ICS?

Patients who have both asthma and COPD, a condition known as asthma-COPD overlap, tend to respond well to inhaled corticosteroids, known as ICS. Also, individuals with higher eosinophil counts (≥300 cells per μL) are more likely to benefit from ICS. Identifying these patient subgroups is crucial for personalizing COPD treatment and maximizing the benefits of ICS therapy while minimizing potential harm.

4

What happens if a patient abruptly stops using ICS?

Abruptly stopping inhaled corticosteroids, or ICS, can lead to a temporary increase in exacerbations. This suggests that when discontinuing ICS, it should be done gradually and with proper supplementation. Monitoring patients closely during and after ICS withdrawal is important to manage any potential exacerbations and ensure a smooth transition to alternative therapies if needed.

5

How does eosinophil count affect ICS treatment?

Peripheral blood eosinophil count affects how effective inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) can be. People with more than or equal to 300 cells per µL of blood eosinophils respond more favorably to ICS-based treatment than those with lower eosinophil counts. The use of blood eosinophil counts helps to target ICS to those most likely to benefit while minimizing treatment for those who are not.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.