Underwater friction stir welding process with robotic arm.

Friction Stir Welding: Is Water the Key to Stronger, More Reliable Joints?

Lena Kashyap in Tech & Innovation July 2025 • 5 min read.

"A comparative study reveals how water-assisted friction stir welding can significantly improve the integrity of aluminum alloy joints, offering new possibilities for manufacturing and engineering."

Friction stir welding (FSW) has emerged as a game-changing technique in the world of materials joining. Unlike traditional welding methods that rely on melting materials together, FSW uses a solid-state process, which means the materials aren't melted. A rotating tool generates friction and heat, plasticizing the metal and creating a robust joint. This method is particularly effective for aluminum alloys, known for their widespread use in industries ranging from aerospace to automotive.

However, FSW isn't without its challenges. The high temperatures involved can lead to undesirable microstructural changes, weakening the joint. To combat this, researchers have explored various modifications to the FSW process, one of the most promising being underwater friction stir welding (UFSW). By submerging the welding area in water, engineers can better control the heat, leading to improved mechanical properties.

Recent research has focused on comparing FSW and UFSW techniques, specifically using AA-5754 aluminum alloy. This alloy is commonly used due to its excellent corrosion resistance and strength. The study, titled 'Friction stir welding of AA-5754 in water and air: a comparative study,' delves into how these two methods affect the microstructure and mechanical properties of the welded joints, providing valuable insights for optimizing welding processes.

FSW vs. UFSW: Understanding the Key Differences and Benefits

Underwater friction stir welding process with robotic arm.

The core of the study involves a detailed comparison between conventional FSW performed in air and UFSW, where the welding process occurs underwater. The researchers varied the rotational speeds of the welding tool to observe the effects on the resulting joints. One of the most significant findings was that UFSW produced defect-free joints across different rotational speeds, while FSW in air resulted in defects at higher speeds (specifically at 1120 rpm).

Why does this difference occur? It boils down to heat management. In FSW, the high temperatures can cause the material to soften excessively, leading to what's known as 'turbulent material flow,' which can create defects. UFSW, on the other hand, benefits from the water's cooling effect, which helps to maintain a more stable temperature and prevent these defects.

Enhanced Microstructure: UFSW results in finer and more uniform grains within the stir zone (SZ), the area most affected by the welding process. This fine-grained structure contributes to improved strength and durability.
Superior Mechanical Properties: Joints created with UFSW exhibit better tensile strength and microhardness compared to those made with FSW in air. This means the UFSW joints can withstand greater forces and are more resistant to wear and tear.
Reduced Thermal Impact: The water cooling in UFSW minimizes the heat-affected zone (HAZ), reducing undesirable changes in the material's properties adjacent to the weld.

Dynamic recrystallization, a process where new, strain-free grains form within the material, was observed in both FSW and UFSW samples. However, the UFSW samples showed a more refined grain structure due to the controlled cooling environment. This is crucial because finer grains typically translate to higher strength and better resistance to cracking. The study also noted that in UFSW, the additional refinement of grains was attributed to lower peak temperatures and shorter durations at high temperatures, thanks to the water's cooling effect.

The Future of Welding: Why UFSW Could Be the Next Big Thing

The research clearly indicates that underwater friction stir welding offers significant advantages over traditional FSW methods, especially for aluminum alloys like AA-5754. By providing better heat management, UFSW leads to stronger, more durable joints with fewer defects. As industries continue to seek more efficient and reliable welding techniques, UFSW stands out as a promising solution that could revolutionize manufacturing and engineering applications.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

What is the fundamental difference between Friction Stir Welding (FSW) and Underwater Friction Stir Welding (UFSW), and why does it matter?

The primary difference between FSW and UFSW lies in the welding environment. FSW is performed in air, while UFSW is conducted underwater. This seemingly small change has significant implications. The water in UFSW acts as a coolant, managing the heat generated during the welding process more effectively than FSW. This improved heat management leads to several advantages, including a more refined microstructure in the stir zone (SZ), superior mechanical properties (higher tensile strength and microhardness), and a reduced heat-affected zone (HAZ). These factors collectively result in stronger, more durable joints with fewer defects, making UFSW a superior method, especially for aluminum alloys like AA-5754.

How does the use of Underwater Friction Stir Welding (UFSW) improve the microstructure of the AA-5754 aluminum alloy compared to standard Friction Stir Welding (FSW)?

UFSW significantly enhances the microstructure of AA-5754 aluminum alloy welds compared to FSW. The key lies in the controlled cooling provided by the water. In UFSW, the cooling effect refines the grain structure within the stir zone (SZ), resulting in finer and more uniform grains. This refined grain structure is a direct result of lower peak temperatures and shorter exposure to high temperatures during the welding process. This is in contrast to FSW, where higher temperatures can lead to larger grains and potentially undesirable microstructural changes, which can weaken the joint. Finer grains, achieved through UFSW, contribute to increased strength and better resistance to cracking, making the welded joints more robust.

What specific mechanical properties are improved in AA-5754 joints when using Underwater Friction Stir Welding (UFSW) compared to Friction Stir Welding (FSW), and why is this important for industrial applications?

UFSW enhances the mechanical properties of AA-5754 joints primarily by increasing tensile strength and microhardness compared to FSW. The improved tensile strength means the UFSW joints can withstand greater forces before failure, while the increased microhardness indicates better resistance to wear and indentation. These improvements are critical for industrial applications because they directly translate to enhanced durability and reliability of the welded components. For example, in aerospace or automotive industries, where components are subjected to significant stresses and environmental factors, the superior performance of UFSW joints ensures longer lifespans and reduced maintenance needs, leading to safer and more cost-effective products.

What role does dynamic recrystallization play in both Friction Stir Welding (FSW) and Underwater Friction Stir Welding (UFSW), and how does the water cooling in UFSW influence this process?

Dynamic recrystallization, the process where new, strain-free grains form within the material during welding, occurs in both FSW and UFSW. However, UFSW's water cooling environment significantly influences this process, leading to improved results. In both methods, the friction and heat cause the existing grains to deform and eventually recrystallize. The key difference is the cooling rate. UFSW's water cooling promotes a more refined grain structure compared to FSW. This is because the rapid cooling in UFSW limits the time the material spends at high temperatures, preventing excessive grain growth. This results in finer grains, which, as previously mentioned, contribute to higher strength and better resistance to cracking. Thus, while dynamic recrystallization is fundamental to both processes, UFSW optimizes it for superior joint properties.

In the context of the study, what are the practical implications of UFSW producing defect-free joints across different rotational speeds compared to FSW, and how does it relate to the overall reliability of the welded structures?

The fact that UFSW produced defect-free joints across different rotational speeds, unlike FSW which showed defects at higher speeds (1120 rpm), has significant practical implications. It suggests that UFSW offers a more robust and forgiving welding process. Defect-free joints are crucial because they ensure the structural integrity of the welded components. The absence of defects in UFSW means that the joints are less likely to fail under stress or environmental conditions. This is particularly important in applications where reliability is paramount, such as in the aerospace or automotive industries. The ability of UFSW to consistently produce high-quality, defect-free joints, regardless of minor variations in the welding parameters, directly translates to increased confidence in the structural reliability and longevity of the welded structures. This is achieved by the efficient heat management and refined microstructure which are characteristic of UFSW.