A jigsaw puzzle of Europe with glowing pieces, symbolizing stateless nations within the EU.

Europe's Stateless Nations: Navigating Autonomy, Identity, and the Future of the EU

Nico Varela in Politics & Policy August 2025 • 5 min read.

"Can regional nationalism and European integration coexist? Examining the complex interplay of stateless nations, regional autonomy, and the drive for sovereignty within the European Union."

The European Union, often hailed as a beacon of integration and cooperation, presents a unique paradox: while striving for unity, it encompasses diverse regions with distinct national identities but without statehood. These "stateless nations," such as Catalonia, Scotland, and Flanders, seek varying degrees of autonomy and, in some cases, outright independence. This creates a complex dynamic that challenges the EU's core principles.

The treaties that underpin the EU aim to foster collaboration while respecting the national identities of member states. But how does this framework accommodate the aspirations of regions that consider themselves nations yet lack a sovereign state? Understanding this delicate balance is crucial for the future stability and cohesion of the European project.

This article delves into the legal and political dimensions of stateless nations within the EU, examining the opportunities and limitations they face, and the challenges the EU faces in balancing regional autonomy with the uniform application of its laws. It explores whether these regional movements represent a threat to European unity or a potential catalyst for a more inclusive and diverse future.

What are Stateless Nations and Plurinational States? Unpacking Paradoxical Terms

A jigsaw puzzle of Europe with glowing pieces, symbolizing stateless nations within the EU.

The concept of a "nation" is complex, especially within constitutional law. Many states, whether unitary or federal, equate a nation with a state, implying a relationship of congruence. This is the well-known theory articulated by Carré de Malberg, where a nation only becomes a person through state organization. The state, likewise, can only form a person through the nation. Ultimately, the terms nation and state are two sides of the same coin.

However, this congruence disappears when considering history, philosophy, or political science. Definitions of "nation" vary widely, but generally acknowledge the existence of "plurinational states," "mono-national states," and "stateless nations." Philosopher Will Kymlicka defines a nation as an intergenerational community, more or less institutionally complete, occupying a given territory or homeland, sharing a distinct language and history. A state is then "multinational" if its members belong to different nations so defined, and if this fact constitutes an important aspect of personal identity and political life.

Ethnolinguistic Distinctiveness: A shared language, culture, and historical narrative that sets the region apart.
Desire for Self-Governance: A collective will to maintain their unique identity and institutions, often expressed through calls for greater regional autonomy or even full independence.
Sub-State Identity: A sense of belonging and shared destiny that exists within the region, separate from the broader national identity of the state in which they reside.

A growing number of constitutional law theorists are attempting to bridge the gap between these legal and political approaches to create a theory of the plurinational state. They challenge the idea of national unity, arguing that a state can, in fact, be composed of multiple nations in law. Some go as far as to say that sub-state nations, freed from their assimilation with the state, should be recognized as distinct legal entities with rights that are not granted by the central state, most notably the right to self-determination. In this view, the founding norm of a plurinational state is only formally the constitution, a unilateral legal act of the sovereign nation. Its material reality is instead a revisable pact between sovereign nations.

Navigating the Complex Terrain: A Call for Moderation and Dialogue

The relationship between stateless nations and the EU is a delicate balancing act. While these regions have legitimate aspirations for autonomy and recognition, they must also operate within the framework of a united Europe. A path forward requires moderation, dialogue, and a commitment to finding solutions that respect both regional identities and the overall integrity of the European project. The future of Europe may well depend on how effectively it addresses the challenges and opportunities presented by its diverse array of stateless nations.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.3917/civit.038.0369, Alternate LINK

Title: Le Pacte Constitutionnel Européen Et Les Nations Sans État

Subject: General Medicine

Journal: Civitas Europa

Publisher: CAIRN

Authors: Hugues Dumont

Published: 2017-01-01

Everything You Need To Know

What are 'stateless nations' in the context of Europe, and what are some examples within the European Union?

Stateless nations are regions or communities within existing states that possess a distinct national identity based on shared ethnolinguistic distinctiveness, a desire for self-governance, and a strong sub-state identity, but lack independent statehood. Examples include Catalonia, Scotland, and Flanders within the European context. These entities often seek greater regional autonomy or full independence, creating a complex dynamic within the European Union.

What are 'plurinational states,' and how does the concept challenge the traditional notion of national unity?

Plurinational states are countries composed of multiple nations, where each nation maintains its distinct identity, culture, and sometimes its own institutions, even within the broader framework of the state. The recognition of these distinct national identities is an important aspect of personal identity and political life. Constitutional law theorists suggest plurinational states should acknowledge sub-state nations as distinct legal entities, with rights not granted by the central state, potentially including the right to self-determination.

How do the EU treaties address the aspirations of stateless nations for greater autonomy or independence?

The treaties underpinning the EU are designed to foster collaboration while respecting the national identities of member states. However, this framework doesn't explicitly address the aspirations of stateless nations within those member states. The EU faces the challenge of balancing regional autonomy with the uniform application of its laws and the overall integrity of the European project. The EU's ability to reconcile these competing forces is crucial for its future stability and cohesion.

What is 'ethnolinguistic distinctiveness,' and how does it play a role in the push for self-governance among stateless nations?

Ethnolinguistic distinctiveness refers to the shared language, culture, and historical narrative that sets a region apart, forming a key component of its unique national identity. This distinctiveness fuels the desire for self-governance, as the region seeks to maintain its identity and institutions, often leading to calls for greater regional autonomy or even full independence. Together these contribute to a sub-state identity that is seperate from the broader national identity of the state in which they reside. A region with strong ethnolinguistic distinctiveness, a clear desire for self-governance and a solid sub-state identity could challenge the existing state structure. Constitutional law theorists advocate for recognizing these nations as distinct legal entities with rights that are not granted by the central state.

How might the growing calls for self-determination from stateless nations impact the future of the European Union?

The growing calls for self-determination from stateless nations within Europe can be seen as both a potential threat and a catalyst for positive change. On one hand, if not managed carefully, these movements could destabilize existing member states and create tensions within the EU. On the other hand, they could also lead to a more inclusive and diverse European project that better respects regional identities and promotes greater democracy and subsidiarity. Dialogue, moderation, and a commitment to finding mutually acceptable solutions are essential to navigate this complex terrain successfully.