Decoding the Data: How Functional Regression Can Help Us Understand Immigration's Impact
"New statistical methods offer a clearer picture of how immigration affects native wages, skill by skill."
In an era defined by unprecedented data availability, our capacity to analyze complex phenomena is ever-expanding. Functional data analysis (FDA) has emerged as a powerful statistical tool, allowing researchers to study intricate relationships between function-valued variables—curves, density functions, and images. One area ripe for this type of sophisticated exploration is the economic impact of immigration, where traditional models often fall short in capturing the nuances of skill-based wage effects.
Traditional linear regression, while useful, struggles when explanatory variables are endogenous—influenced by factors within the model itself. This is especially true when studying immigration, where factors like omitted variables or measurement errors can skew results, obscuring the true impact on native-born workers' earnings. Recently, statisticians have begun to tackle this issue within functional regression, but practical applications have been limited due to the complexities of estimator distributions and statistical inference.
A groundbreaking paper introduces new Functional Principal Component Analysis (FPCA)-based instrumental variable estimators. This technique not only addresses the endogeneity problem but also provides detailed asymptotic properties, allowing for more robust conclusions. Applying their methodology to the study of immigration, these researchers offer fresh insights into how immigration affects native wages across different skill levels.
What is Functional Instrumental Variable Regression (FIVR)?

Functional regression steps beyond standard regression by treating variables as functions. Imagine tracking a worker's wage not as a single number, but as a curve representing their earning potential across different skill levels. Functional regression allows us to model this type of data directly, uncovering relationships that traditional methods might miss.
- Omitted Variable Bias: Failing to account for relevant factors (e.g., local economic conditions, technological changes) that influence both immigration patterns and native wages.
- Measurement Error: Inaccuracies in measuring immigrants' skills or education levels.
- Reverse Causality: The possibility that wage levels attract immigration, rather than immigration driving wage changes.
Why This Matters: Implications and Future Directions
The development of consistent FPCA-based instrumental variable estimators represents a significant step forward in economic analysis. By addressing the challenges of endogeneity and providing detailed methods for statistical inference, these new tools allow for a more accurate and nuanced understanding of complex economic phenomena. These methods offer valuable insights for policymakers seeking to understand and manage the economic effects of immigration, potentially leading to more effective and equitable labor market policies.