Chinese guardian lion protecting supermarket aisle

Decoding China's Moral Market: Why Food Scandals Reveal More Than Just Bad Apples

Author's portrait.
Theo Raines in Business & Economy June 2025 • 4 min read.

"A deep dive into how Chinese citizens navigate food safety concerns, state responsibility, and the evolving concept of moral economy in a rapidly changing market."


Imagine dining with a 'fake-fighter' in China, someone who dedicates their life to exposing counterfeit goods. This was the reality in October 2009, as conversations unfolded about the politics of consumption and the state's role in safeguarding its citizens. The cynicism was palpable, a belief that genuine consumer welfare required fundamental shifts at the highest levels of government.

In contemporary China, the anxiety surrounding food quality and safety isn't just a matter of individual concern; it's a societal reflection of moral expectations placed on state institutions. When injustices are perceived, Chinese consumer-citizens often bypass legalistic interpretations of consumer rights, appealing instead to broader ideals of fairness and state accountability. This perspective echoes historical concepts of moral economy, where the state is seen as a paternalistic guardian, responsible for the well-being of its people.

This article explores how Chinese citizens' moral imaginings of the market implicate state actors and institutions. By examining these perceptions, we can redefine our understanding of the commodity relationship, moving beyond simplistic buyer-seller dynamics to include the crucial role of the state in mediating these interactions through law and regulation. The goal is to explore the political potential of consumer rights and the complex interplay between consumption and citizenship in modern China.

The Paternalistic State: Expectations vs. Reality

Chinese guardian lion protecting supermarket aisle

The concept of a moral economy has deep roots, echoing Aristotelian ideals of fairness and just pricing. In essence, it provides a platform for articulating shared grievances, rooted in a community consensus that traditional rights and customs should protect the welfare of all, especially the vulnerable. In China, this translates to an expectation that the state will act as a moral actor, ensuring the market operates fairly and safely.

However, the reality often falls short of these expectations. While the Chinese Consumer Protection Law offers a framework for citizens to seek redress, it's often perceived as inadequate in addressing the structural imbalances between buyers and sellers. Consumers frequently express concerns about weak enforcement, corruption, and the overwhelming power of large corporations, leading to a sense of vulnerability and injustice.

  • Weak Enforcement: Laws exist but are not consistently or effectively enforced.
  • Corruption: Government officials may be susceptible to bribery, undermining regulatory efforts.
  • Imbalance of Power: Individual consumers struggle against powerful manufacturers and retailers.
Adding to the complexity is the state's promotion of self-reliance and individual responsibility, a strategy that attempts to shift the burden of consumer safety onto the citizens themselves. This approach is at odds with the deep-seated expectation that the state should act as a paternalistic guardian, leading to a moral tension between the 'Maoist moral contract' and the postsocialist ethos of self-reliance. This tension underscores that moral claims produced in social and historical contexts are not easily dislodged under new economic regimes.

Reclaiming Moral Economies

The moral economy of food safety in China reveals a complex interplay of historical expectations, state actions, and individual perceptions. By demystifying the state's role in the food system and recognizing consumers' efforts to re-embed and re-politicize food production and regulation, we can move towards a more nuanced understanding of this critical issue. States influenced by neoliberal ideology will always attempt to absolve themselves of responsibility for the ills of the market, from child labor to fake pharmaceuticals, and they must be reminded that moral economies underlie relationships between states and citizens.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

What is the significance of the 'fake-fighter' experience in the context of Chinese food safety?

The experience of dining with a 'fake-fighter' in China highlights the palpable cynicism surrounding food safety. It underscores the belief that genuine consumer welfare necessitates fundamental shifts at the highest levels of government. This exemplifies the deep-seated distrust in the market and the state's ability to safeguard citizens, setting the stage for understanding the moral economy's role in shaping consumer perceptions and demands for accountability.

2

How does the concept of 'moral economy' influence Chinese consumers' expectations regarding food safety?

The moral economy, rooted in historical expectations, shapes Chinese consumers' perceptions by positioning the state as a paternalistic guardian. This perspective leads to the expectation that the state will ensure the market operates fairly and safely, protecting the vulnerable. This framework contrasts with the reality of food safety scandals and perceived injustices, where consumers often bypass legalistic interpretations, appealing instead to broader ideals of fairness and state accountability.

3

What are the primary reasons for consumer dissatisfaction with the Chinese Consumer Protection Law?

Consumers often express concerns about weak enforcement, corruption, and the overwhelming power of large corporations, leading to a sense of vulnerability and injustice. The existing framework of the Chinese Consumer Protection Law is perceived as inadequate in addressing the structural imbalances between buyers and sellers. Weak enforcement, corruption within government, and the power of large corporations undermine the law's effectiveness and fuel consumer dissatisfaction.

4

How does the state's promotion of self-reliance create tension in the context of food safety in China?

The state's promotion of self-reliance and individual responsibility attempts to shift the burden of consumer safety onto the citizens themselves. This approach clashes with the deep-seated expectation that the state should act as a paternalistic guardian. This creates a moral tension between the 'Maoist moral contract' and the postsocialist ethos of self-reliance, reflecting the challenges of balancing historical expectations with contemporary economic realities.

5

What are the implications of understanding the 'moral economy' in the context of Chinese food scandals?

Understanding the moral economy provides a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between the state, consumers, and the market. It reveals a complex interplay of historical expectations, state actions, and individual perceptions. By recognizing consumers' efforts to re-embed and re-politicize food production and regulation, we can identify the political potential of consumer rights and address the root causes of food safety issues in China. It challenges the neoliberal ideology that attempts to absolve the state of responsibility, reminding us that moral economies shape the relationships between states and citizens.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.