Animals equipped with tracking devices in various habitats.

Decoding Animal Behavior: How Biologging and Remote Sensing Are Changing Wildlife Studies

"Unlocking the secrets of the animal kingdom through advanced technology: a deep dive into biologging and remote sensing techniques."


For decades, understanding the intricate behaviors of animals in their natural habitats remained a formidable challenge. Traditional observation methods often proved inadequate due to the elusive nature of many species and the limitations of human presence. However, thanks to rapid advancements in technology, a new era of wildlife research has dawned.

Biologging and remote sensing technologies have emerged as powerful tools, enabling scientists to collect unprecedented amounts of high-quality data on animal movements, interactions, and physiology. These technologies, ranging from GPS trackers to accelerometers and camera traps, provide invaluable insights into the lives of creatures great and small.

This article delves into the fascinating world of biologging and remote sensing, exploring how these innovative techniques are revolutionizing the study of animal behavior. We will examine various types of loggers and sensors, discuss their applications in different research areas, and highlight best practices for data collection and analysis.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Methods and instrument impacts

Resource selection functions combined with biologging-derived data are described as the most widely used method for studying habitat use. Over the last six decades, researchers have reduced instrument effects through device miniaturization, sophisticated release mechanisms, and other technological advances. Yet devices can still affect animal physiology, behavior, and demography—the very measures they are used to study. A minimum reporting standard informed by research on instrument impacts is proposed to support animal welfare and data quality as biologging expands.

What are Biologging and Remote Sensing?

Animals equipped with tracking devices in various habitats.

At its core, biologging involves attaching miniaturized tags to animals to record and relay data about their movements, behavior, physiology, or environment. These tags can either directly acquire information (e.g., accelerometers measuring activity levels) or emit a signal that requires a remote sensor for interpretation (e.g., GPS trackers).

Remote sensing, on the other hand, refers to acquiring information about an object or phenomenon without direct contact. In wildlife research, remote sensors such as camera traps and acoustic recorders capture data on untagged animals or transform signals from animal-borne tags into usable information.

  • Biologging: Attaching tags to animals to record data about their movements and behavior.
  • Remote Sensing: Using sensors to gather information about animals from a distance.
  • Telemetry: A specific case of remote sensing that involves tracking signals emitted by animal-borne tags.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Recent work on animal behaviour

Nature’s animal behaviour research page describes a field spanning studies under experimental and natural conditions, as well as behaviourism and ethology. A Nature Communications listing dated April 1, 2026, highlights a systematic review and meta-analysis of unimodal and multimodal predation-risk assessment in birds. The listing says birds’ behavioural responses to predation risk could depend on the type and number of cues. Animal Biotelemetry describes its scope as research using telemetric techniques to understand physiological, behavioural, and ecological mechanisms.

Welfare and bias concerns

Biologging devices can affect tagged animals’ behaviour and thereby distort or bias study results, even as their widespread use has yielded insights into behaviour, movement, and physiology. A 2024 article on biologging and animal welfare argues that limitations must be overcome to realize the approach’s potential for assessing welfare in wild animals. A 2025 article proposes a registry, potentially managed by the International Biologging Society, the Animal Behavior Society, or the Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. The proposed registry could record the expertise of biologists, veterinarians, and animal caretakers involved in biologging research.

Animal-borne devices as research tools

A 2025 article describes biologging as the use of animal-borne devices to study animals’ behavioural ecology, physiology, and surrounding environment. This framing positions biologging as a tool for examining both animals and the environments around them. The source does not provide a comparison of biologging with other methods or report comparative results.

While satellite remote sensing provides valuable environmental data, this article primarily focuses on biologging techniques and remote sensing methods directly applied to animal monitoring.

Why Biologging and Remote Sensing Matter?

The data derived from biologging and remote sensing are instrumental in addressing diverse themes within behavioral ecology, offering quantitative assessments of animal behavior. These technologies are particularly valuable for monitoring species that are rare, cryptic, nocturnal, or inhabit inaccessible environments. By shifting the point of observation from the researcher to the animal, biologging minimizes disturbance and provides a more natural view of behavior.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

From individual records to ecological insight

A 2020 article reports that GPS and accelerometer data from animal tracking devices can provide high and relatively equal sampling intensities of behaviour across instrumented individuals in a population. It describes biologgers as enabling discoveries about patterns, causes, and consequences of animal behaviour. The authors present examples of how biologging can deepen fundamental understanding of ecosystems and applied understanding of global-change impacts by enabling tests of ecological theory. A 2024 publication is identified as addressing how biologgers can help solve fundamental questions from individuals to ecosystems.

Connecting tracking to conservation

A 2026 article says that using multiple sensors can help explore animal–environment interactions and inform conservation and management. It describes biologging and biotelemetry as tools for generating robust, ecologically relevant, and management-relevant data, from identifying problems to testing solutions. A 2025 article argues that the biodiversity crisis, urbanization, habitat fragmentation, and climate change call for new ways to assess conservation impact. It presents animal biologging as a cost-effective method for monitoring biodiversity at its source, including tracked animals.

Where wildlife measures agree and differ

Camera traps and GPS collars can capture broad population patterns, but their estimates of specific wildlife–habitat relationships may differ. The comparison points to differences in sampling power and spatial alignment as possible reasons.[1]

Camera traps offer a non-invasive way to observe animal behaviour, while accelerometers classify behaviours from data collected by animal-borne devices. The reports describe different tools and outcomes, not a direct comparison between them.[2] [3]

The figures behind wildlife tracking

  • 0.88 vs. >0.92 F-measureIn the accelerometer model, walk classification scored lower than the other reported behaviours: 0.88 compared with above 0.92 for trot, run, shake, rest, feed and groom.[4]
  • 98.76% overall accuracyThe scimitar-horned oryx behaviour classifier had 98.76% overall accuracy across feeding, headshaking, resting and locomotion.[3]
  • 63 daysGiant armadillo devices tracked for 63 days on average before falling off and being retrieved for data download.[5]
  • 100 estimates; 72 included; 24 excludedThe elephant analysis used 100 annual estimates from 72 individuals; 24 other elephants were excluded because they lacked a full calendar year of GPS fixes.[6]

What tracking can reveal, and what it cannot

Automated tracking can turn continuous individual records into measures of movement, habitat use, activity and more detailed behaviour. This makes differences between animals visible across meaningful time spans, rather than relying only on snapshots.[7]

Movement tracks can also be sorted into behavioural modes with time-series models that account for autocorrelation. The resulting categories are most dependable when observational error is low and consistent across individuals.[6]

Taken together, these reports show that richer tracking data can support behavioural classification and ecological comparisons, but the apparent precision of a result does not make every behaviour equally easy to identify or every comparison equivalent.[1] [4]

What wildlife tracking still needs to clarify

  • How much can short deployments confuse natural behaviour or physiology with effects associated with capture and tag placement?[8]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

What exactly are biologging and remote sensing, and how do they differ in studying animal behavior?

Biologging involves attaching small tags to animals to record and transmit data about their movements, behavior, physiology, or environment. These tags can gather information directly, like accelerometers measuring activity levels, or emit signals that require a remote sensor for interpretation, such as GPS trackers. Remote sensing, conversely, acquires information about an object or phenomenon without direct contact. In wildlife research, remote sensors like camera traps and acoustic recorders capture data on untagged animals or transform signals from animal-borne tags into usable information. Biologging focuses on the animal-attached technology, while remote sensing observes from a distance, often complementing the data collected via biologging.

2

Why is data derived from biologging and remote sensing so important in behavioral ecology?

Data from biologging and remote sensing is crucial because it offers quantitative assessments of animal behavior. These technologies are especially valuable for studying rare, cryptic, nocturnal, or inaccessible species. By shifting the observation point to the animal itself, biologging reduces disturbance and provides a more natural and detailed view of behavior that traditional methods might miss. It allows continuous, long-term monitoring which provides insights into behavioral patterns and ecological interactions that were previously impossible to obtain.

3

How does telemetry relate to remote sensing in the context of wildlife research?

Telemetry, a specific case of remote sensing, involves tracking signals emitted by animal-borne tags. While both are related to observing from a distance, remote sensing is broader, including methods like camera traps that don't necessarily rely on signals from tagged animals. Satellite remote sensing provides valuable environmental data which is related but is not the focus of this particular work, which zeroes in on biologging techniques and remote sensing methods applied directly to animal monitoring.

4

What are some specific examples of loggers and sensors used in biologging and remote sensing, and what kind of data do they provide?

Several types of loggers and sensors are used. GPS trackers help monitor movement patterns. Accelerometers measure activity levels and energy expenditure. Camera traps capture visual data of animal behavior and presence, and acoustic recorders capture audio data, useful for studying vocalizations and environmental sounds. These tools offer different data types that can be combined to provide a comprehensive understanding of animal behavior and ecology.

5

What are some of the limitations and challenges associated with using biologging and remote sensing technologies in wildlife studies?

While biologging and remote sensing offer unparalleled access to animal behavior, potential challenges include the ethical considerations of attaching devices to animals, ensuring the technology does not negatively impact their well-being or behavior. Data analysis can be complex and require interdisciplinary expertise to interpret the large datasets generated. Also, the cost of the equipment and deployment can be a limiting factor, especially for long-term studies or when working with multiple animals or species. Addressing these limitations is crucial for maximizing the benefits of these technologies while minimizing potential drawbacks.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.