Interconnected business network with a green leaf, symbolizing sustainable decarbonization.

Decarbonization Dilemma: Can Firm-Level Strategies Save Jobs and the Economy?

Avery Sinclair in Climate & Environment July 2025 • 4 min read.

"New research reveals how targeted approaches to reducing carbon emissions at the company level can minimize economic fallout."

The urgent need to decarbonize our economies presents a significant challenge: how to rapidly reduce carbon emissions without causing widespread economic disruption. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has emphasized the necessity of 'rapid and far-reaching transitions' across various sectors to prevent catastrophic climate change. However, the implementation of these changes could have unintended and negative economic consequences.

A new study analyzes the intricate relationships within firm-level production networks to explore strategies that minimize unemployment and economic losses during rapid decarbonization. By understanding how businesses are interconnected, researchers are uncovering ways to mitigate the adverse effects of traditional 'command-and-control' decarbonization approaches.

This research demonstrates that incorporating firm-level production network data into decarbonization planning can significantly reduce adverse economic outcomes. It contrasts naive strategies that target the largest emitters with more sophisticated approaches that consider the systemic importance of individual firms, revealing pathways to preserve both employment and economic output while achieving substantial emissions reductions.

The Hidden Costs of Blanket Decarbonization

Interconnected business network with a green leaf, symbolizing sustainable decarbonization.

Traditional Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) often lack the granular detail needed to understand the real-world economic consequences of decarbonization policies. These models frequently operate at a sector-level, overlooking the crucial firm-level dynamics that drive economic activity. While useful for high-level planning, they can fail to capture the cascading effects of disruptions within supply chains.

The LAGOM model family represents a notable exception, simulating the economy as a firm-level production network. However, even these models often rely on sector-level data for initialization due to data limitations. This highlights a critical gap: the need for detailed, firm-level data to accurately model the impact of decarbonization strategies.

Cost-Benefit Models: Such as DICE, FUND, and PAGE, estimate the ‘social cost of carbon’ (SCC) to determine optimal levels of global warming.
Process-Based Models: Used by the IPCC (IMAGE, MESSAGEix, AIM/GCE, GCAM, REMIND-MAgPIE, and WITCH), analyze mitigation options and future development pathways.
Newer Models: Like E3ME and the agent-based DSK model, consider economic disequilibrium and heterogeneous economic agents.

The study uses the 'economic systemic risk index' (ESRI) to assess the systemic relevance of individual firms. This index estimates the total economic output loss resulting from the disruption of a firm's operations. By modifying the output-weighted ESRI (OW-ESRI) to estimate job losses, the researchers created an 'employment-weighted' ESRI (EW-ESRI), providing a crucial metric for understanding the employment impact of decarbonization.

A Path Forward: Smart Decarbonization Strategies

This research underscores the importance of incorporating firm-level production networks into decarbonization planning. By identifying and targeting 'decarbonization leverage points' – firms with high emissions and low systemic risk – policymakers can minimize the economic fallout of the green transition. This approach offers a promising path towards achieving climate neutrality while safeguarding employment and economic stability. Future research should explore supply-chain sensitive CO2 taxes to accelerate the transition.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: 10.1038/s41893-024-01321-x,

Title: Firm-Level Supply Chains To Minimize Unemployment And Economic Losses In Rapid Decarbonization Scenarios

Subject: econ.gn physics.soc-ph q-fin.ec

Authors: Johannes Stangl, András Borsos, Christian Diem, Tobias Reisch, Stefan Thurner

Published: 17-02-2023

Everything You Need To Know

What is the main challenge of decarbonization efforts?

The main challenge of decarbonization efforts is to rapidly reduce carbon emissions without causing widespread economic disruption. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emphasizes the need for 'rapid and far-reaching transitions' but these changes could have unintended negative economic consequences, such as unemployment and economic losses. The research aims to find strategies to minimize these negative impacts.

How do firm-level production networks play a role in decarbonization strategies?

Firm-level production networks are crucial because they reveal the interconnections between businesses. Analyzing these networks helps in designing effective decarbonization strategies that protect jobs and economic stability. By understanding how businesses are interconnected, researchers can identify 'decarbonization leverage points' and mitigate the adverse effects of traditional approaches. This allows policymakers to target interventions more effectively, minimizing economic fallout during the green transition.

What is the significance of the 'economic systemic risk index' (ESRI) in this context?

The 'economic systemic risk index' (ESRI) is used to assess the systemic relevance of individual firms. It estimates the total economic output loss resulting from the disruption of a firm's operations. By modifying the output-weighted ESRI (OW-ESRI) to estimate job losses, the researchers created an 'employment-weighted' ESRI (EW-ESRI). This helps in understanding the potential employment impact of different decarbonization strategies, allowing for more targeted and effective policies.

What are the limitations of traditional Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) and how does the research overcome them?

Traditional Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) often lack the granular detail needed to understand the real-world economic consequences of decarbonization policies because they operate at a sector-level. They can fail to capture the cascading effects of disruptions within supply chains. The research overcomes these limitations by incorporating firm-level production network data into decarbonization planning. By focusing on the systemic importance of individual firms and using metrics like the ESRI, the research offers a more detailed and accurate understanding of the potential economic impacts.

How can policymakers implement 'smart decarbonization strategies' and what are the benefits?

Policymakers can implement 'smart decarbonization strategies' by incorporating firm-level production networks into their planning. This involves identifying and targeting 'decarbonization leverage points' – firms with high emissions and low systemic risk. The benefits of this approach include minimizing the economic fallout of the green transition, protecting employment, and safeguarding economic stability. It offers a promising path towards achieving climate neutrality while avoiding widespread economic disruption, and future research could explore supply-chain sensitive CO2 taxes to accelerate this transition.