Cracking the Code: How Your Genes Influence Cleft Lip and Palate Risk
"Unlocking the genetic secrets behind non-syndromic orofacial clefts may lead to better understanding and preventative strategies."
Orofacial clefts, characterized by the incomplete fusion of facial structures during development, are among the most common congenital abnormalities. While various factors contribute to their occurrence, genetics play a significant role, particularly in non-syndromic orofacial clefts (NSOC), which occur without other major developmental abnormalities.
Among all the risk factors during NSOC progression, the genetic factor takes a critical role. There are three main types of orofacial clefts: cleft lip only (CLO), cleft lip with palate (CLP), and cleft palate only (CPO) (Lacheretz and Poupard, 1972).
MicroRNAs (miRNAs), small non-coding RNA molecules, regulate gene expression and play crucial roles in craniofacial development. Expression and synthesis of miRNAs are regulated by miRNA processing genes. Disruptions in these regulatory processes can significantly impact embryonic development and increase the risk of clefts. Understanding these genetic underpinnings is essential for identifying potential preventative measures and therapeutic targets.
miRNA Processing Genes: What Role Do They Play in Cleft Lip/Palate?

A recent study explored the relationship between genetic variations in microRNA (miRNA) processing genes and the risk of non-syndromic orofacial clefts (NSOC). Researchers focused on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within these genes to determine their potential impact on craniofacial development. The study looked at 12 potentially functional SNPs from seven miRNA processing genes (GEMIN3, DROSHA, DGCR8, GEMIN4, PIWIL1, XPO5, and DICER) in a case-control study of 602 NSOC cases and 605 controls.
- rs10719 in DROSHA: This SNP was found to increase the risk of CL/P. Specifically, individuals with the GA/AA genotype had a higher likelihood of developing cleft lip with or without palate (P=0.024, OR=1.33, 95% CI=[1.04, 1.70]). Similarly, those with the GG+GA/AA genotype also showed an increased risk (P=0.037, OR=1.29, 95% CI=[1.02, 1.63]).
- rs493760 in DROSHA: Conversely, this SNP appeared to reduce the risk of CL/P. Individuals with the CC/TT genotype had a lower risk compared to others (P=0.049, OR=0.58, 95% CI=[0.34, 0.99]).
- Haplotype Analysis: Researchers also examined how combinations of these SNPs (haplotypes) influenced risk. The rs10719 (A)-rs493760 (C) haplotype was associated with a decreased risk of CL/P (OR=0.77, 95% CI=[0.63, 0.94]). However, the rs10719 (G)-rs493760 (C) haplotype was linked to an increased risk of cleft palate only (CPO) (OR=2.70, 95% CI=[1.15, 6.35]).
Implications and Future Directions
This study provides preliminary evidence that variations in the DROSHA gene, specifically rs10719 and rs493760, may contribute to the risk of non-syndromic orofacial clefts. While further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms, this work highlights the importance of miRNA processing genes in craniofacial development. Future studies with larger sample sizes and functional experiments are essential to validate these associations and identify potential therapeutic targets for preventing or treating orofacial clefts.