Career ladder formed by interconnected network nodes

Cracking the Code: How Connections Really Help You Climb the Ladder

"Is it who you know, or what you know? New research reveals the surprising truth about the role of connections in promotions and success."


We’ve all heard it: “It’s not what you know, it’s who you know.” But how much truth is there to this age-old saying, especially when it comes to career advancement and other forms of success? While talent and hard work are undoubtedly crucial, the role of connections—those networks of people you know and who know you—can be a significant, yet often misunderstood, factor. Are connections simply a vehicle for favoritism, or do they actually provide valuable information that helps decision-makers identify the best candidates?

New research is shedding light on this complex dynamic, moving beyond simplistic notions of “good” or “bad” connections to understand the nuanced ways in which these relationships influence outcomes. The traditional approach to studying connections has often relied on measuring quality long after someone has been promoted, received a grant, or published a paper. This method attempts to determine if those who benefited from connections were, in fact, more deserving based on later performance. However, this approach is limited. It’s difficult to accurately measure 'true quality,' and it's almost impossible to separate the impact of the connection from the individual’s inherent abilities and subsequent growth.

A groundbreaking study offers a fresh perspective, using data collected at the time of key decisions—like promotions—to analyze the impact of connections. This innovative method distinguishes between two primary benefits of connections: information and favors. By understanding how these mechanisms work, you can better leverage your own network and navigate the often-opaque pathways to success.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Why Connections Matter

Cisco describes computer networking as connecting devices such as PCs, smartphones, doorbells, and thermostats so they can communicate with one another. Its networking basics overview identifies switches, routers, and wireless access points as essential components that connect devices to each other and to networks such as the Internet. IBM reports that computer networks also support centralized data stores, helping teams share organizational data instead of maintaining separate repositories.

Building a Professional Network

Coursera reports that networking can connect people with like-minded individuals, job opportunities, and job referrals. Its suggested methods include attending industry-specific conferences, joining online communities, meeting an acquaintance for coffee, and staying in touch with a past coworker. These approaches expand opportunities through continued contact, although the source does not establish that any single method guarantees career advancement.

A Broad Foundation

The available material does not provide a documented history of professional networking or identify specific milestones in how it developed. In broad terms, networking can be understood as building and maintaining connections that support communication and opportunity. Any detailed historical account would require additional sources.

Decoding the Two Sides of Connection: Information vs. Favoritism

Career ladder formed by interconnected network nodes

Connections can be advantageous for two main reasons. The first is information. Your network can provide valuable insights about your skills, projects, or potential. This information can help recruiters, juries, or editors make better, more informed decisions. Your contacts can vouch for you and give you an edge if your quality is truly present. However, the opposite is also true. Your network can also influence decision-makers to unduly favor connected candidates, potentially leading to suboptimal choices. This is often referred to as nepotism.

Distinguishing between these two effects is crucial because they have opposite implications. When information drives the success of connected individuals, it suggests that networks are facilitating efficient talent allocation. On the other hand, if favoritism is the primary driver, it raises concerns about fairness and meritocracy. The new research offers a novel way to differentiate these forces, relying on the premise that information makes decisions less predictable, while favoritism introduces systematic biases.

  • Information Channel: When connections convey information, decision-makers gain additional insights about a candidate's abilities. To an outside observer (the econometrician), this makes the promotion decision appear more random. The jury has more information than the numbers or information presented.
  • Favoritism Channel: Favors, on the other hand, introduce systematic biases. Connected candidates may be evaluated more leniently, leading to a higher likelihood of promotion, even if their qualifications are not superior.
AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

What Current Evidence Shows

No source material was provided for a current research review of professional networking and career advancement. A careful discussion should therefore avoid claiming specific findings, effect sizes, or expert consensus. Additional studies would be needed to assess how networking affects promotion, mobility, and long-term career outcomes.

Where Networking May Fall Short

The available sources do not document specific failures, drawbacks, or counterarguments concerning professional networking. It would therefore be premature to claim that networking is either universally effective or ineffective. A fuller analysis would need evidence about barriers, unequal access, weak connections, and situations in which networking does not produce opportunities.

Comparing Networking Approaches

No source material compares different networking methods or measures their relative effectiveness. The supplied evidence does not support ranking conferences, online communities, informal meetings, or reconnecting with former coworkers. Comparative conclusions would require studies that evaluate these approaches using consistent outcomes.

Imagine a panel evaluating candidates. If a connection provides genuine insight into a candidate's potential (information), the panel's decision will be more informed. Conversely, if the connection simply sways the panel to view a candidate more favorably (favoritism), the decision becomes biased. Therefore, one can see, with appropriate adjustments, what affects people, and by how much.

Harnessing the Power of Connection: A Strategic Approach

Connections can significantly influence your career. The new research helps us understand how. It's not enough to simply build a large network; it's crucial to cultivate meaningful relationships that can provide valuable information and support. As this article showed, having an abundance of connections that aren't good, will not actually provide and positive reinforcement. By understanding the dynamics at play, you can become more aware of the power of connections. By learning that, you'll be able to navigate your company's, or industry's social environment to provide yourself a competitive advantage.

AI Search Multiple angles on this topic

Connections as Opportunity Channels

The available material supports viewing networking as a way to create communication and opportunity channels, but it does not provide expert commentary on career advancement. Networking may involve deliberate participation in communities and ongoing contact with other people. Stronger conclusions about climbing the career ladder would require sources focused specifically on professional outcomes.

An Open Research Agenda

The supplied sources do not make forecasts about the future of professional networking or identify emerging frontiers. Future analysis could examine how online communities, workplace communication tools, and changing professional relationships affect career opportunities. Such possibilities should remain provisional without supporting research.

The Wider Context

No source in this subsection addresses systemic inequality, access to professional networks, or broader social and economic challenges. It is therefore not possible to draw a sourced conclusion about who benefits most from networking. Those issues would require dedicated evidence on inclusion, opportunity, and institutional practices.

People Behind the Connections

The available material does not provide evidence about the personal experiences or real-world career effects of professional networking. In general terms, networking depends on people communicating, participating in communities, and maintaining relationships. Claims about confidence, belonging, promotions, or individual outcomes would need sources that directly examine those experiences.

How the promotion evidence compares

In centralized academic selection exams, acquainted evaluators were linked to higher promotion chances; the source of that premium varied with the relationship.[1]

The study at a glance, in its own terms

PopulationCandidates for academic promotions in Spain and Italy and political promotions in China[2]
SettingAcademic promotions in Spain and Italy; political promotions in China[2]
Main outcomeFavoritism and information effects in promotions[2]
Times cited3[2]

Reading the connection mechanisms

The paper’s method treats unpredictability and threshold shifts as clues to different mechanisms: added candidate information raises variation in latent errors, whereas favors alter the promotion cutoff.[2]

Questions the connection findings leave open

  • Would the information and favor channels appear similarly in promotions outside the academic and political settings covered by the study?[2]

Short answers on the promotion study

Why can a connection help a candidate?

It may convey information about the candidate, or it may lead decision-makers to grant a favor.[2]

What kinds of outcomes have connections been associated with?

The paper notes connections in contexts including jobs, promotions, grants, loans, and publishing.[2]

About this Article -

Written with AI assistance from published research, and reviewed by the Mystum team. See our About page for more information.

This article is based on research published under:

DOI-LINK: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.07723,

Title: Promotion Through Connections: Favors Or Information?

Subject: q-fin.ec

Authors: Yann Bramoullé, Kenan Huremović

Published: 23-08-2017

Everything You Need To Know

1

How do connections impact career advancement, and is it all just about who you know?

Connections play a significant role in career advancement, but it's not solely about 'who you know'. Research indicates that connections can provide valuable information or lead to favoritism. Information gained through connections can offer insights into skills and potential, aiding decision-makers. On the other hand, favoritism can create biases, potentially leading to unfair advantages for connected individuals, regardless of their qualifications. Therefore, while connections matter, the *type* of influence they exert—information or favoritism—is crucial in determining their true impact.

2

What are the two primary ways connections can be advantageous in professional settings?

Connections can be advantageous in two main ways: through the information channel and the favoritism channel. The information channel involves connections providing valuable insights about a candidate's abilities, projects, or potential, enabling decision-makers to make more informed choices. The favoritism channel, however, involves connections influencing decision-makers to unduly favor connected candidates, potentially leading to biased decisions. Distinguishing between these two effects is critical for understanding the true impact of networks on career advancement and fairness.

3

How does the 'information channel' work, and how does it improve decision-making?

The 'information channel' operates by providing decision-makers with additional insights into a candidate's abilities and potential. When connections convey genuine information, it enriches the evaluation process, making decisions appear more random to an outside observer because they are based on a more comprehensive understanding. This improved information flow can lead to more informed choices, benefiting both the decision-maker and the candidate by ensuring that talent is recognized and rewarded based on merit. This helps to enhance the overall quality of talent allocation.

4

What is the 'favoritism channel,' and what are its potential negative implications for fairness and meritocracy?

The 'favoritism channel' introduces systematic biases by influencing decision-makers to view connected candidates more favorably, regardless of their qualifications. This can lead to a higher likelihood of promotion or selection, even if other candidates are more deserving. The negative implications for fairness and meritocracy are significant, as favoritism undermines the principles of equal opportunity and rewards based on talent and hard work. It raises concerns about equitable talent allocation and can create a perception of unfairness within organizations, leading to reduced morale and engagement.

5

How can individuals strategically harness the power of connections for career advancement, according to the research?

To strategically harness the power of connections, it's essential to cultivate meaningful relationships that provide valuable information and support rather than simply building a large network of superficial contacts. Understanding the dynamics of how connections influence decisions—whether through information or favoritism—is crucial. By focusing on building connections that can vouch for your abilities and provide genuine insights to decision-makers, you can leverage your network to your advantage and navigate the social environment of your industry effectively. The quality of connections matters more than the quantity.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.