Symbolic illustration of researchers and care home staff collaborating on data collection.

Cracking the Care Home Data Code: How to Improve Research Collection

Elliot Brynn in Health & Wellness August 2025 • 4 min read.

"Uncover strategies to tackle data collection challenges in care homes and ensure successful research outcomes."

Research in care homes is vital for enhancing the quality of life for residents, informing best practices, and shaping effective policies. However, conducting research in these settings presents unique challenges. From gaining staff buy-in to managing data collection logistics, researchers face a complex landscape that demands careful navigation.

A recent study, the Falls in Care Home (FinCH) study, involving 87 care homes and over 1600 residents across the UK, sheds light on these challenges and offers valuable insights. The FinCH study aimed to collect data on various measurements, including falls, medication usage, and access to primary care services. By examining the hurdles encountered during data collection, the study provides a roadmap for future research endeavors in care homes.

This article delves into the key challenges and facilitators identified by the FinCH study. It offers practical strategies and actionable recommendations for researchers, care home staff, and policymakers to improve data collection processes and foster a more collaborative research environment.

Common Roadblocks in Care Home Data Collection

Symbolic illustration of researchers and care home staff collaborating on data collection.

One of the primary obstacles identified in the FinCH study was a lack of engagement from working-level staff. Many staff members felt overburdened and viewed the research activities as an additional strain on their already demanding workloads. This sentiment was often compounded by conflicting priorities, such as the implementation of new care schemes.

Communication issues also played a significant role. Staff members sometimes harbored suspicions about the study's intentions, particularly if they felt inadequately informed about its purpose and non-judgmental nature. Furthermore, a lack of training in research methods left some staff feeling unprepared and uncertain about their role in the data collection process.

Limited Staff Buy-In: Address staff workload concerns and highlight the study's benefits.
Communication Gaps: Clearly communicate study goals and address staff concerns.
Insufficient Training: Provide research method training to care home staff.
Unrealistic Expectations: Ensure data collection timelines are feasible for care home staff.

Another critical issue was the misinterpretation of research protocols. Some staff members lacked a clear understanding of concepts such as randomization and blinding, leading to unintentional breaches of research protocols. This highlights the importance of providing comprehensive training and ongoing support to ensure the integrity of the data collection process.

Building Bridges: Fostering a Collaborative Research Environment

The FinCH study underscores the importance of building strong relationships between researchers and care home staff. By implementing a comprehensive communication plan, providing adequate research training, and addressing staff concerns, researchers can create a more collaborative and supportive environment. This, in turn, will lead to more accurate and reliable data, ultimately benefiting the residents and the broader care community.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

Why is the Falls in Care Home (FinCH) study considered important?

The Falls in Care Home (FinCH) study is significant because it sheds light on the challenges of conducting research in care homes. It highlights specific hurdles encountered during data collection, such as limited staff buy-in, communication gaps, and insufficient training. The FinCH study is important as it offers valuable insights and a roadmap for future research endeavors aimed at enhancing the quality of life for residents and informing best practices within care homes. The implications of such a study are far-reaching, potentially shaping policies and improving the overall care environment.

What does 'limited staff buy-in' mean, and why is it an obstacle in research?

Limited staff buy-in refers to the lack of engagement from care home staff in research activities. It is a significant obstacle because overburdened staff members may view research as an additional strain on their workload, leading to resistance or lack of participation. Addressing limited staff buy-in is crucial for ensuring successful data collection and fostering a collaborative research environment. Without it, research outcomes may be compromised, and the potential benefits for residents may not be realized. Overcoming this requires highlighting the study's benefits and addressing workload concerns.

What are 'communication gaps' in the context of care home research, and why is it important to address them?

Communication gaps in the context of research within care homes refer to misunderstandings or lack of information shared between researchers and care home staff. These gaps can lead to staff suspicions about the study's intentions or a lack of understanding about their role in the data collection process. Addressing communication gaps is essential because clear communication ensures that staff members are well-informed, reducing mistrust and increasing their willingness to participate. Implications of unresolved communication gaps include compromised data integrity and a less collaborative research environment.

What is 'insufficient training,' and why is it a problem for research in care homes?

Insufficient training means that care home staff lack adequate preparation in research methods. This is significant because without proper training, staff members may feel unprepared and uncertain about their role in the data collection process, leading to unintentional breaches of research protocols or inaccurate data. Providing research method training to care home staff is crucial for ensuring data integrity and promoting a more collaborative research environment. Overcoming this may also include training staff on concepts such as randomization and blinding.

What does it mean to foster a 'collaborative research environment', and why is it so vital?

Fostering a collaborative research environment refers to building strong relationships between researchers and care home staff through open communication, adequate training, and addressing staff concerns. It's vital because it creates a supportive atmosphere where staff members are more willing to participate in research activities, leading to more accurate and reliable data. The implications of a collaborative environment include improved research outcomes, enhanced care practices, and a greater positive impact on the lives of care home residents. The FinCH study underscores the importance of this concept.