Scales of justice upended by a corporate building, illustrating consumer protection challenges.

Consumer Protection Under Attack: How Supreme Court Rulings are Hijacking Your Rights

Author's portrait.
Beau Callahan in Law & Justice June 2025 • 4 min read.

"Uncover the Impact of the Concepcion Cases on Consumer Rights and Arbitration"


In the landmark 2011 case of AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a decision that continues to stir controversy. The court held that state-level unconscionability defenses against class-arbitration waivers in consumer adhesion contracts were preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). This ruling has significantly curtailed consumers' opportunities to have their legal complaints heard in a court of law, tilting the scales in favor of large corporations.

However, the story doesn't end there. In the wake of Concepcion, courts and agencies across the nation have sought innovative ways to challenge the legality of arbitration clauses. This article delves into these post-Concepcion legal battles, examining their viability in the face of a Supreme Court that seems determined to fortify the FAA, even when it means overriding other federal laws.

Join us as we dissect the key cases, explore the arguments for and against these rulings, and uncover what options remain for consumers seeking justice in an increasingly complex legal landscape. Understand how these shifts impact your rights and what strategies you can use to protect yourself.

The Concepcion Ruling: What Happened and Why It Matters?

Scales of justice upended by a corporate building, illustrating consumer protection challenges.

To truly understand the impact of the Concepcion ruling, we must first revisit Discover Bank v. Superior Court, a 2005 California Supreme Court case. In Discover Bank, Christopher Boehr, a credit card holder, challenged the legality of a clause in Discover's card application that forbade customers from engaging in any form of class-wide arbitration against the bank. The California Supreme Court sided with Boehr, establishing what became known as the "Discover Bank rule."

This rule invalidated class-action waivers on unconscionability grounds when: the waiver existed in a 'take it or leave it' consumer adhesion contract; the amount of money being disputed was inconsequential; and the party with superior bargaining power had carried out a scheme to deliberately cheat large numbers of consumers out of individually small sums of money.

  • The Takeaway: The “Discover Bank rule" was widely cited for five years, before being reversed in the case of AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
The Concepcion case presented similar circumstances: challenges to class-arbitration prohibitions in consumer adhesion contracts. Unfortunately for the Concepcions, they chose to adjudicate their case in federal court rather than state court, despite residing in California. A decision which proved to be fatal to their case, thanks in large part to hostility among the U.S. Supreme Court's conservative bloc to state-level FAA challenges. Justice Antonin Scalia, who authored the Concepcion opinion, used the opportunity to entirely abrogate the California Supreme Court's Discover Bank holding. He stated that absent any specific congressional mandate, general public policy reasons were insufficient grounds for superseding the FAA and its 90 years of historical precedent.

Empowering Consumers in a Post-Concepcion World

Concepcion and its progeny create a chilling effect on attorneys representing individuals injured from certain suspect business practices because adequate attention and relief through a class is nearly impossible. In many instances, the only way these practices are economically and efficiently redressed is through the class action route.

About this Article -

This article was crafted using a human-AI hybrid and collaborative approach. AI assisted our team with initial drafting, research insights, identifying key questions, and image generation. Our human editors guided topic selection, defined the angle, structured the content, ensured factual accuracy and relevance, refined the tone, and conducted thorough editing to deliver helpful, high-quality information.See our About page for more information.

Everything You Need To Know

1

What was the 'Discover Bank rule,' and what consumer protection did it offer?

The 'Discover Bank rule,' established in Discover Bank v. Superior Court, prevented companies from using class-action waivers in consumer contracts when the contract was a 'take it or leave it' adhesion contract, the disputed amount was small, and the company deliberately cheated many consumers out of small sums. The California Supreme Court sided with Christopher Boehr who challenged the legality of a clause in Discover's card application that forbade customers from engaging in any form of class-wide arbitration against the bank.

2

What was the significance of the Supreme Court case AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion regarding consumer rights?

The Supreme Court case AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion significantly impacted consumer rights by ruling that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempts state-level unconscionability defenses against class-arbitration waivers in consumer adhesion contracts. This curtailed consumers' ability to pursue legal complaints in court, favoring large corporations.

3

How did Justice Antonin Scalia's opinion in the Concepcion case affect the Discover Bank holding and state consumer protection laws?

Justice Antonin Scalia, in the Concepcion opinion, invalidated the California Supreme Court's Discover Bank holding by stating that without a specific congressional mandate, general public policy isn't sufficient to override the FAA's historical precedent. This decision limited the ability of states to protect consumers through their own laws regarding arbitration clauses.

4

How have courts and agencies responded to the Concepcion ruling, and what challenges do they face?

Following the Concepcion ruling, courts and agencies have explored ways to challenge the legality of arbitration clauses. However, the Supreme Court's stance favoring the FAA makes these challenges difficult. The post-Concepcion legal battles have been focused on finding innovative ways to challenge the legality of arbitration clauses.

5

What are the implications of the Concepcion ruling for attorneys representing consumers, and why are class actions important?

The Concepcion ruling makes it challenging for attorneys to represent individuals harmed by certain business practices because it hinders the use of class actions. Class actions are often the most economically efficient way to address these practices. Adequate attention and relief is nearly impossible without class action.

Newsletter Subscribe

Subscribe to get the latest articles and insights directly in your inbox.